Sunday, July 26, 2026

What Are Political Parties For?

So, the DNC is a mess. (The voters decide who makes the gains, not the DNC.) How bad is it?, you ask.

No; worse than that: NYT. NOTUS. The Bulwark. Sounds like a three alarm fire. And yes, the GOP has a huge money advantage. Except donors in Texas don’t want to back Paxton. And so far all he’s come up with is “Talafreako” (which Talarico turned into a t-shirt); “Low-T Talarico” (Talarico said that’s something old guys worry about); and running away from reporters. While Talarico’s so far ahead of Paxton in fundraising the distance can be measured in terms of the moon’s distance from the earth.

Had I not read these tweets, I wouldn’t know the DNC was in trouble. Then again, the RNC cash isn’t buying the GOP a shot at holding Congress. The DNC may be in serious financial trouble by November. But the GOP is done for after 2028, and everybody knows it. No Trump, no MAGA. Period. And the GOP is all MAGA, all the time.

So, the question is: what are political parties for?

Aside from political reporters, does anyone care that the DNC is broke? Does anyone think it fundamentally shifts the predictions for November? Seems unlikely, as the disaster outlined in the articles has been going on for awhile, but nobody seems to have noticed until now. Apparently Ken Martin is bad at his job. But you know what? So is Donald Trump. Which failure do I think is more consequential?

I mean, the DNC has been low on funds long enough to mortgage its building for a line of credit, and yet no one reading the polls thinks Democrats are going to lose because of it. 

Or maybe they will after this story percolates. But, you know, narratives are fickle that way. Especially the ones that disappear on Election Night, never to be heard from again. Really, the very worst part about election year politics is the stupidity narratives that won’t die; until election night, and then it’s like they never were. Political parties persist; but more and more, nobody can explain why.

🧟‍♂️

2 comments:

  1. According to wikipedia the DNC is most active during a Presidential election year. They put on the national convention and serve as a co-ordinator between the Presidential campaign and the state campaigns. It is supposed to be involved with party branding but has no direct power over elected officials. So it seems just as well to me the DNC *isn't* swimming in money.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sort of puts to rest the idea that the likes of George Soros is bankrolling the Democrats, though truth was never a part of that claim. I can't recall which Repubican-fascist hack it was I found out was one of his protogees last week, it wasn't one of the ones I've already listed, it's a new one. Ol' George sure can pick 'em.
    Speaking of Georges, why isn't Clooney doing a fundraiser among his Hollywood "liberal" buddies who certainly have that kind of money to throw around. Maybe he's fire fighting in his bug-out country.

    ReplyDelete