The ECA says "objections," which, yes, is terribly non-specific. But "objections" have to have some basis in law, otherwise Congress' actions are a nullity. Congress is not going to pass a resolution saying the elections was fraudulent, or even suspect. So there is, I think, a basis for objecting to any vote at all, up or down, on "objections" that are not going to provide a different outcome than the one before the Congress, and one allowed by law.NEW: 10 senators (including Cassidy, Romney, Murkowski and Collins) urge Congress to "fulfill its responsibility to certify the election results."
— Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) January 3, 2021
"Further attempts to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election are contrary to the clearly expressed will of the American people" pic.twitter.com/aLklAHK1Be
I mean, Trump has just lost his fucking mind:statement from @repKenBuck, @RepArmstrongND, @RepGallagher, @NancyMace, @RepThomasMassie, @RepMcClintock, @chiproytx on election certification in the House pic.twitter.com/vrya8QNZ36
— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) January 3, 2021
That, by the way, was yesterday.Wow. https://t.co/b271qiszyE pic.twitter.com/uzjEbErAIV
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) January 3, 2021
Respectfully, President Trump: What you're saying is not true. The truth will come out https://t.co/ViYjTSeRcC
— GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (@GaSecofState) January 3, 2021
And really, the representatives in the House don't have any support even from the extreme right wing:“It’s gonna be costly to you.” I’ve charged extortion in mob cases with similar language. https://t.co/wB0jV9Mkhl
— Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) January 3, 2021
Gotta go get more popcorn. Epiphany (Jan. 6) is gonna be lit!The memo doesn't mince words. https://t.co/FMq0bHAd0E
— Derek T. Muller (@derektmuller) January 3, 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment