honestly I thought they’d manage a lot better. Given how many idiots there are in any organization I figured they could at least cherry pick some decent stuff. But it’s yoel roth saying remember what happened in 2016, we need to be cautious. Wow. He must feel pretty ashamed!
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) December 3, 2022
basically from start to finish the only person coming through any of this looking even half way decent in yoel roth
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) December 3, 2022
$44 billion to spend makes you a konstitooshinal skollar!Hilarious seeing even a lot of wingnut saying,
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) December 3, 2022
The press was asked not to show FDR’s wheelchair, and to look away from JFK’s philandering. Those weren’t violations of the First Amendment, either.you comical freak, Biden wasn’t the government. This happened under Trump!
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) December 3, 2022
It isn’t, and you clearly don’t know what is.If this isn’t a violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment, what is?
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 3, 2022
This is why we leave these matters to judges, and not the owners of social media platforms.Lots of things.
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) December 3, 2022
Presidential campaigns aren’t the government — and thus, just like Twitter, aren’t bound by the First Amendment. https://t.co/M0Ia36y42O
congress will investigate a private company’s editorial decisions to make sure that private companies’ editorial decisions aren’t being influenced by politics https://t.co/d1hb2oPmj8
— farhad manjoo (@fmanjoo) December 3, 2022
They’re upset that government didn’t intervene to tell Twitter what to do about the Hunter story. This is six lines of cocaine stupid. https://t.co/XMKU9iPHqd
— Bradley P. Moss (@BradMossEsq) December 3, 2022
And of course, what was deleted?Tucker Carlson guest admits the Twitter documents released by Elon Musk are “not really the smoking gun we'd hoped for”https://t.co/xrgmqlGV1O
— Media Matters (@mmfa) December 3, 2022
I just deleted the first tweet in this thread because it accidentally contained revenge porn. It said:
— Micah Lee (@micahflee) December 3, 2022
That first tweet contained nude images of Hunter Biden and a woman without their consent... that should have stayed up? https://t.co/Id8c88F1gl pic.twitter.com/N6QsVmfmkU
I think we’re done here.Wow did not previously recognize what an essential role Hunter Biden’s peen plays in the operation of the marketplace of ideas
— Popehat (@Popehat) December 3, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment