AUSTIN BOMBING SUSPECT IS DEAD. Great job by law enforcement and all concerned!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 21, 2018
VERY Presidential.
Ordinary people call this "dancing on the grave." Is it good the suspect is dead? Only in the sense that, if this was the bomber, the wave of terrorism in Austin is over. Otherwise, cheering the death of a human being is the act of....well, not an admirable person, to say the least. Besides, why do I think he heard about this on cable news?
Department of Justice should have urged the Supreme Court to at least hear the Drivers License case on illegal immigrants in Arizona. I agree with @LouDobbs. Should have sought review.— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 21, 2018
“Special Council is told to find crimes, whether a crime exists or not. I was opposed to the selection of Mueller to be Special Council. I am still opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because.....— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 21, 2018
...there was no probable cause for believing that there was any crime, collusion or otherwise, or obstruction of justice!” So stated by Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 21, 2018
I really can't imagine....
if I can make it thru the next year without punching someone..it will be a miracle.
ReplyDeleteSaid by the man who congratulated the man who has ordered up the murders of scores of people on winning a rigged election. And that's not counting the people murdered as part of his foreign and military policies.
ReplyDeleteThis is the most decadent point in American history.
Alan Dershowitz is a disgrace, I'm beginning to think that the people who speculate this has something to do with the accusations made against him might be on to something, because there's no rational or moral reason for him to be doing what he's doing. Unless it's over Israel in some insane way.
I love the way Dershowitz knows the facts of the case because he's on FauxNews. His screed might work as a defense motion to get more information from the prosecution if he had a defendant to represent, but as a statement about the facts of the investigation, his conclusion is completely groundless.
ReplyDeleteBut he's on the TeeVee! He must know what he's talking about!
He is on Fox News, thus anything he says dispositive. At least enough for the Preznit. QED
ReplyDelete