“No corroborating evidence to back reports.” Department of Defense. Do people still not understand that this is all a made up Fake News Media Hoax started to slander me & the Republican Party. I was never briefed because any info that they may have had did not rise to that level— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 1, 2020
Maybe try "No Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt!" Besides, which is it? The intelligence was not supported? Or the whole story is a fabrication? If it is a lie, why did the CIA refer it to DOJ for criminal investigation of the leak? Why were you briefed on it?
And the Congressional Republicans? And the Gang of Eight (who are finally getting a briefing, someday). Which is it? Is it a lie? Is it invalid? Is it a breach of national security?Intelligence on the Russian bounty plot was included in the President’s Daily Brief earlier this year, a source says.— New Day (@NewDay) July 1, 2020
But he did nothing, @JohnAvlon says. In today’s #RealityCheck, he explains how this fits in the larger pattern of Trump’s posture towards Russia’s Putin. pic.twitter.com/BlrAV02hLQ
his career, a career senior servant, a CIA officer + she made that decision because she didn’t have the confidence in the intelligence that came up...She made that call + you know what she made the right call. And knowing the facts I know now, I stand behind that call.” @CBSNews— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) July 1, 2020
How does this fit Donald's narrative?
Trump is now calling the confirmed reporting about Russian bounties a hoax, siding with the Kremlin over our own intelligence and that of our allies. Trump is a threat to national security. #BountyGate pic.twitter.com/v8i8bwhEW8— MeidasTouch.com (@MeidasTouch) July 1, 2020
It can't be all three are true.
No comments:
Post a Comment