Friday, October 31, 2025

And The Other Four?

He thinks about bathrooms and the Kennedy Center and playing golf?

🎃 Once A Year Is Biblical 🎄

 My brother-in-law was over last night. We’re both in our 70’s, so we fell to talking about “the way things were,” as old people are wont to do. He argued that there were once rules, and being ex-Green Beret, he used the military as his example. In the military, he said, the same rules apply to everyone. I didn’t point out that, under the UCMJ, the general gets much more deference than the private; and today, especially, the SOD (which the military is properly under, the SOD being a civilian) , the rules have been tossed in a shredder as Hegseth fires general officers right and left. It’s a hegemonic move not unlike the white, male privilege he and I grew up under. Although we learned that hegemony as harmony, and Hegseth wields it to hide how weakness; much like the man who appointed him. My brother-in-law is an interesting (and not unusual) mix of conservative political values, and yet fully aware of the injustices done by white hegemony and economic power. Aware of it, and concerned by it. So this wasn’t an argument with a drunk uncle at Thanksgiving. It wasn’t an argument at all. He acknowledged his contradictions, even as he didn’t see any way to resolve them. I sympathize. It took seminary and years of work to change myself enough to eliminate some of the contra. Even then, it was my adult daughter who pointed out she walked through a world of dangers (from sexual harassment to threats of assault) that I simply didn’t live in. There is always another perspective than that of the straight, white, middle class m heterosexual male. And it’s hard to realize that perspective shouldn’t be normative.

We even talked about Hallowe’en in our youth. But we didn’t think about this:

Maybe it’s the corn syrup talking, but to me, Halloween will always be the quintessential American holiday. The Fourth of July and Thanksgiving don’t come close. Plenty of countries, dictatorships included, commemorate their nation’s founding and designate evenings to spend with relatives. Halloween is a night when kids visit strangers, people with no blood ties and no debt to their family, and receive gifts with no obligation in return. It is an exercise in civic trust, a belief in one’s neighbors regardless of religion, creed or political party. It’s a cheesy, cheery, schmaltzy, “Brady Bunch” optimism. My family and countless others have crossed oceans for it.
That’s the perspective of a young boy, a Russian immigrant, on his first Hallowe’en. So, add to my categories above, “American.” It never occurred to me that Hallowe’en was an act of civic trust. I know there’s “trunk or treat” parties, now, and the distinctly suburban neighborhoods of my childhood are not common even here in Houston. My street is a passageway. The street I grew up on was traveled only by neighbors. For three years after we moved here, we lived in a parsonage next to the church, on a busy four lane road. The nearest neighborhoods were miles down the road. We drove my daughter to friends’ neighborhoods. We certainly couldn’t let her walk out the front door, as I did when I was her age. Today there are barely any children in the neighborhood. We don’t buy candy, because no one comes to take it. But if they started up again, if children moved to the neighborhood, we’d open the door to them, without hesitation.  “Trick or treat!”

It occurs to me that the two great civic occasions in America are founded on Xian holidays (holy days), but they are both exercises in civic trust. Xmas may be uncomfortable, even oppressive, to non-Xians, but the secular observance has nothing to do with Xianity. Maybe the Xmas tree is the ancestor of the Paradeisbaum from German passion plays, but who is really aware of that? Is Santa Claus really St. Nicholas, or just a jolly old elf in a red coat? Separated entirely from Epiphany, gifts on Xmas morning are practically a private, civic duty. The culture tells us to never disabuse children of the “truth” about Santa, and even if we never fully live up to it, once a year it’s another civic creed that it is better to give than to receive. If any of this is oppressive to non-Xians, it isn’t meant to be. The season is so secular everyone is invited to join, and almost nobody wants to go to church when Xmas is on a Sunday (except the Catholics, who started it. The religious descendants of the Puritans who banned Christmas now, more often than not, close church that one Sunday every seven years or so.) Thanksgiving is purely secular, but private (Christmas morning is, too). July 4th, especially in these times, could easily be jingoistic and mean, when “patriotism” is confined to “true patriots,” which may not include you. But Xmas? That’s the season (a whole month!) when we’re supposed to open our hearts and welcome the stranger and feed the hungry and clothe the naked. And all because we are supposed to be generous and caring, if not 12 months a year, then at least for part of one.

Hallowe’en is not as big as that;  but maybe that makes it the gateway to Xmas; a smaller civic celebration that really is an act of civic trust, to get us ready to open our doors to friends (for parties), and, at least a little bit, to strangers, to whom we offer a bit more than candy. Every year I get appeals, starting in October, from charities pointing out that Xmas is coming. It’s the time of year we are expected, and expect, to give.

As the Russian immigrant said, reflecting on his childhood and his then confused grasp of English:
Triko-reet once a lifetime was very good. Triko-reet once a year was biblical.
Maybe Hallowe’en is a gateway to Xmas, a secular one. As Xmas is a secular gateway to New Year’s, in which we hope (but always fail) to carry that “Xmas spirit” into a brand new year.

There are worse ways to think about civic duty and civic trust, and civic holidays.

When Will The Democrats Let Speaker Johnson Reconvene The House?

“The Whole Superstructure Of Constitutional Government”

Precisely NOT how pronouns work. So, this issue IS non-negotiable. 🤔 And law. Which seems to be another pesky thing we don’t need to worry about, maybe because it all goes to the Democrats and the whole superstructure of constitutional government. The rule of law includes Emily Post? I must have missed that in law school. That’s some catch, that Catch-22.

Hallowe’en

Yes, those are my jack o' lanterns, from 20 years ago.  I've seldom been so ambitious since.

Upon that night, when fairies light
On Cassilis Downans dance,
Or owre the lays, in splendid blaze,
On sprightly coursers prance;
Or for Colean the route is ta'en,
Beneath the moon's pale beams;
There, up the cove, to stray and rove,
Among the rocks and streams
To sport that night.

Among the bonny winding banks,
Where Doon rins, wimplin' clear,
Where Bruce ance ruled the martial ranks,
And shook his Carrick spear,
Some merry, friendly, country-folks,
Together did convene,
To burn their nits, and pou their stocks,
And haud their Halloween
Fu' blithe that night.

The lasses feat, and cleanly neat,
Mair braw than when they're fine;
Their faces blithe, fu' sweetly kythe,
Hearts leal, and warm, and kin';
The lads sae trig, wi' wooer-babs,
Weel knotted on their garten,
Some unco blate, and some wi' gabs,
Gar lasses' hearts gang startin'
Whiles fast at night.

Then, first and foremost, through the kail,
Their stocks maun a' be sought ance;
They steek their een, and graip and wale,
For muckle anes and straught anes.
Poor hav'rel Will fell aff the drift,
And wander'd through the bow-kail,
And pou't, for want o' better shift,
A runt was like a sow-tail,
Sae bow't that night.

Then, staught or crooked, yird or nane,
They roar and cry a' throu'ther;
The very wee things, todlin', rin,
Wi' stocks out owre their shouther;
And gif the custoc's sweet or sour.
Wi' joctelegs they taste them;
Syne cozily, aboon the door,
Wi cannie care, they've placed them
To lie that night.

The lasses staw frae 'mang them a'
To pou their stalks of corn:
But Rab slips out, and jinks about,
Behint the muckle thorn:
He grippet Nelly hard and fast;
Loud skirl'd a' the lasses;
But her tap-pickle maist was lost,
When kitlin' in the fause-house
Wi' him that night.

The auld guidwife's well-hoordit nits,
Are round and round divided,
And monie lads' and lasses' fates
Are there that night decided:
Some kindle coothie, side by side,
And burn thegither trimly;
Some start awa, wi' saucy pride,
And jump out-owre the chimlie
Fu' high that night.

Jean slips in twa wi' tentie ee;
Wha 'twas she wadna tell;
But this is Jock, and this is me,
She says in to hersel:
He bleezed owre her, and she owre him,
As they wad never mair part;
Till, fuff! he started up the lum,
And Jean had e'en a sair heart
To see't that night.

Poor Willie, wi' his bow-kail runt,
Was brunt wi' primsie Mallie;
And Mallie, nae doubt, took the drunt,
To be compared to Willie;
Mall's nit lap out wi' pridefu' fling,
And her ain fit it brunt it;
While Willie lap, and swore by jing,
'Twas just the way he wanted
To be that night.

Nell had the fause-house in her min',
She pits hersel and Rob in;
In loving bleeze they sweetly join,
Till white in ase they're sobbin';
Nell's heart was dancin' at the view,
She whisper'd Rob to leuk for't:
Rob, stowlins, prie'd her bonny mou',
Fu' cozie in the neuk for't,
Unseen that night.

But Merran sat behint their backs,
Her thoughts on Andrew Bell;
She lea'es them gashin' at their cracks,
And slips out by hersel:
She through the yard the nearest taks,
And to the kiln goes then,
And darklins graipit for the bauks,
And in the blue-clue throws then,
Right fear't that night.

And aye she win't, and aye she swat,
I wat she made nae jaukin',
Till something held within the pat,
Guid Lord! but she was quakin'!
But whether 'was the deil himsel,
Or whether 'twas a bauk-en',
Or whether it was Andrew Bell,
She didna wait on talkin'
To spier that night.

Wee Jennie to her grannie says,
"Will ye go wi' me, grannie?
I'll eat the apple at the glass
I gat frae Uncle Johnnie:"
She fuff't her pipe wi' sic a lunt,
In wrath she was sae vap'rin',
She notice't na, an aizle brunt
Her braw new worset apron
Out through that night.

"Ye little skelpie-limmer's face!
I daur you try sic sportin',
As seek the foul thief ony place,
For him to spae your fortune.
Nae doubt but ye may get a sight!
Great cause ye hae to fear it;
For mony a ane has gotten a fright,
And lived and died deleeret
On sic a night.

"Ae hairst afore the Sherramoor, --
I mind't as weel's yestreen,
I was a gilpey then, I'm sure
I wasna past fifteen;
The simmer had been cauld and wat,
And stuff was unco green;
And aye a rantin' kirn we gat,
And just on Halloween
It fell that night.

"Our stibble-rig was Rab M'Graen,
A clever sturdy fallow:
His son gat Eppie Sim wi' wean,
That lived in Achmacalla:
He gat hemp-seed, I mind it weel,
And he made unco light o't;
But mony a day was by himsel,
He was sae sairly frighted
That very night."

Then up gat fechtin' Jamie Fleck,
And he swore by his conscience,
That he could saw hemp-seed a peck;
For it was a' but nonsense.
The auld guidman raught down the pock,
And out a hanfu' gied him;
Syne bade him slip frae 'mang the folk,
Some time when nae ane see'd him,
And try't that night.

He marches through amang the stacks,
Though he was something sturtin;
The graip he for a harrow taks.
And haurls it at his curpin;
And every now and then he says,
"Hemp-seed, I saw thee,
And her that is to be my lass,
Come after me, and draw thee
As fast this night."

He whistled up Lord Lennox' march
To keep his courage cheery;
Although his hair began to arch,
He was say fley'd and eerie:
Till presently he hears a squeak,
And then a grane and gruntle;
He by his shouther gae a keek,
And tumbled wi' a wintle
Out-owre that night.

He roar'd a horrid murder-shout,
In dreadfu' desperation!
And young and auld came runnin' out
To hear the sad narration;
He swore 'twas hilchin Jean M'Craw,
Or crouchie Merran Humphie,
Till, stop! she trotted through them
And wha was it but grumphie
Asteer that night!

Meg fain wad to the barn hae gaen,
To win three wechts o' naething;
But for to meet the deil her lane,
She pat but little faith in:
She gies the herd a pickle nits,
And two red-cheekit apples,
To watch, while for the barn she sets,
In hopes to see Tam Kipples
That very nicht.

She turns the key wi cannie thraw,
And owre the threshold ventures;
But first on Sawnie gies a ca'
Syne bauldly in she enters:
A ratton rattled up the wa',
And she cried, Lord, preserve her!
And ran through midden-hole and a',
And pray'd wi' zeal and fervour,
Fu' fast that night;

They hoy't out Will wi' sair advice;
They hecht him some fine braw ane;
It chanced the stack he faddom'd thrice
Was timmer-propt for thrawin';
He taks a swirlie, auld moss-oak,
For some black grousome carlin;
And loot a winze, and drew a stroke,
Till skin in blypes cam haurlin'
Aff's nieves that night.

A wanton widow Leezie was,
As canty as a kittlin;
But, och! that night amang the shaws,
She got a fearfu' settlin'!
She through the whins, and by the cairn,
And owre the hill gaed scrievin,
Whare three lairds' lands met at a burn
To dip her left sark-sleeve in,
Was bent that night.

Whyles owre a linn the burnie plays,
As through the glen it wimpl't;
Whyles round a rocky scaur it strays;
Whyles in a wiel it dimpl't;
Whyles glitter'd to the nightly rays,
Wi' bickering, dancing dazzle;
Whyles cookit underneath the braes,
Below the spreading hazel,
Unseen that night.

Among the brackens, on the brae,
Between her and the moon,
The deil, or else an outler quey,
Gat up and gae a croon:
Poor Leezie's heart maist lap the hool!
Near lav'rock-height she jumpit;
but mist a fit, and in the pool
Out-owre the lugs she plumpit,
Wi' a plunge that night.

In order, on the clean hearth-stane,
The luggies three are ranged,
And every time great care is ta'en',
To see them duly changed:
Auld Uncle John, wha wedlock joys
Sin' Mar's year did desire,
Because he gat the toom dish thrice,
He heaved them on the fire
In wrath that night.

Wi' merry sangs, and friendly cracks,
I wat they didna weary;
And unco tales, and funny jokes,
Their sports were cheap and cheery;
Till butter'd so'ns, wi' fragrant lunt,
Set a' their gabs a-steerin';
Syne, wi' a social glass o' strunt,
They parted aff careerin'
Fu' blythe that night.


--Robert Burns

You cannot make heads or tails of this without Burns' annotations, which you can find here (and you thought Eliot invented the self-annotated poem), complete with an Eliotesque headnote (he expected you to read Greek and Latin; Burns expects you to read Scots dialect and know that Cassilis Downans is not just a place, but a fairy haunt.  What did people do before Google?).

Yes, I’ve done this once or twice before. But the point of the poem is that it describes the Hallowe’en parties of yore, recounting all the practices usual for the celebration. Most of them were aimed at prognostication, usually around who one would marry. It’s really fun to read, and following Burns’ notes will repay the effort. What it doesn’t have to do with is ghoulies and ghosties and things that go bump in the night. Which tells you our modern Hallowe’en is a very modern invention, and probably says more about us than about our ancestors.

Who seem to have had a much better time of it.

Walpurgisnacht 🎃

 I know absolutely nothing about Walpurgisnacht  except what Deems Taylor says about it on “Fantasia.” He connects it to Mussorgsky’s “A Night on Bald Mountain,” which he says was written about the night and what happens there. I’m not worried about the anthropological soundness of the story, or the accuracy of the music history. For our purposes, we can take them both as read. 

I’m fairly certain the Irish took Samhain (which is not synonymous with All Hallow’s Eve) as a “thin time” when the veil between living and dead allowed them to feel more connected to the dear departed. The older I get and the more family and friends I outlive, the more I find that idea comforting rather than frightening. Walpurgisnacht on Bald Mountain is supposed to be the frightening version of that, with Satan freed to celebrate with his minions this one night of the year. That idea bleeds over into Hallowe’en in some circles, especially among fundie Xians who think people in costumes and jack o’ lanterns are invitations to the demonic. As if people weren’t evil enough without pumpkins and yard decorations.

Which brings me around to my point, actually. The Ancient Greek idea of reality was that chaos underlay all, and as much as reason worked to suppress it, that was all reason could do: suppress chaos. Temporarily. Chaos would eventually overwhelm reason, and once again prevail.

Which is not what we get on Bald Mountain. Satan, demons, witches, and ghosts disport madly, gaily, freely: until sunrise. At which point they retreat, as All Saints Day reasserts authority. Chaos has one night; order has the rest of the year.

It seems a fair trade off.



(Another fun fact about “Fantasia” I’ll drop here because it’ll be seasonally appropriate in another month. The film includes “The Nutcracker Suite.” Mr. Taylor concludes his remarks on that segment by noting the Tchaikovsky piece “isn’t heard much these days.” What a difference a few decades make, huh?)

As I Said….

Trump can barely think 5 minutes into the future. Come 2027, he’d be screaming that the Senate must reinstate the filibuster because “THE CHOICE IS CLEAR! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! AGAIN!”

The man is no more capable of long term strategy than an infant. In fact, the infant is probably more capable.


Thursday, October 30, 2025

🦆

Trump is a lame duck trying desperately to not look like a lame duck.  He’s not planning for tomorrow; he’s thinking about the next ten minutes.

It’s really as simple as that.
It’s a very easy case to make, and a very hard one to pass into law. But America is fucked up that way.
I was part of the internal Trump administration team trying to convince the president to end the shutdown in 2018 - 2019 — for 35 days — before people went hungry, workers lost pay, and government services collapsed.

Here’s what I learned: he doesn’t give a shit.
No shit, Sherlock.

Jessica Tarlov:
It continues to be the height of embarrassment that our allies know that Trump is made happy if you treat him like a toddler playing dress-up and give him the crown that he covets or have a merch stand with his branding.
Or just whisper sweet nothings in his ear:
"I was struck when the president said that he gave this a 12 on a scale of 10 for being a great meeting, and that they made a lot of progress and 'We're very close on some important things,'" Baker quoted. "That's almost word-for-word the things he said when he met in Alaska with Vladimir Putin. I was there in the room for that, he said. It was a 10 out of 10, not 12, but it was a 10 out of 10. 'And they made a lot of progress. And we're very close on some really important things.'"

Trump visited Alaska to meet with Putin and lobby for an end to the war in Ukraine.

"And of course, we all know what happened after Alaska, which is nothing," said Baker. "So, you know, you've got to be careful about overevaluating how much this will be worth. If it means, though, that there is sort of a, kind of a truce in a way, that there is a less hostile relationship for them now."

The exchanges, he said, are less hostile and less volatile, and that's the only real progress.
Xi said:
Xi, speaking through an interpreter, carefully acknowledged Trump's presence at the peace signing while subtly undermining his narrative. "During your visit to Malaysia, you witnessed the signing of the Joint Declaration on Peace along the Cambodia-Thailand border, and you provided your support," Xi stated, before asserting China's central role.

" China has assisted Cambodia and Thailand in our own way to resolve the border dispute, and we continue to promote peace talks to address other pressing issues in the region."
What Trump heard:
“The sun shines out of your ass and the tides go in and out at your command. You are the reason the world turns and the seasons change. Surely no one has ever achieved the magnificence of you”
And just when you think Trump is the only one dangerously divorced from reality: Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder would reject “Springtime for Hitler” in favor of that as the worst piece of fiction possible. That also makes Trump look like a serious thinker. 
Just an odd side note: this brainless twit is running for the GOP nomination for Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Basically the state bookkeeper. A position that has nothing whatsoever to do with tax policy (that’s the Lege). What he’s advocating here is to completely defund Texas public schools, an idea so incandescently stupid even the Lege would never consider it. (The current officeholder tried to get the Lege to use the surplus funds, garnered from school district property taxes, to return that money to the schools 3 years ago. The Lege declined, and used the money claim its wise policies had produced it. I think most voters bought it.) But Huffines is trying to win in the GOP primary. “Low information voters” would credit them with too much knowledge. Pretty sure this is because of the OBBB you said would be the last bill Congress would need to pass in his term. And I’m also pretty sure the Speaker of the House is a Republican, and isn’t letting Republicans negotiate with Democratic House members.

Let me wedge this in before we get to the last one:
Thanks. I needed that. All right, last one:
Sure, sure:
Joanna Coles, The Daily Beast's chief creative and content officer, described how Trump appears to be struggling on his own to climb up and down stairs while "officials waiting below held their collective breath not out of awe, but out of risk assessment."

It became clearer as he descended the steps from Air Force One that he "might suddenly fall away" as he made several stops along a tour through Asia.

And after 60, she explains, "a fall is the express lane to decline."

But the biggest difference between Trump and the other aging presidents before him is that he seems to lack a partner to help him.

"President Donald Trump, 79, doesn’t stride off planes anymore. He negotiates with them," Coles writes. "And on this latest Asian tour, the person whom we assumed would be at his side, Melania, the world’s most famously disengaged First Lady, was once again conspicuously absent. One begins to wonder if she’s in hiding, or holed up writing a sequel to her memoir. Either way, the man is alone."

It's clear he needs some extra help, she adds.

"Let’s drop the pretense: Trump needs a companion. Not a Secret Service agent, not an aide with a golf bag or a nuclear football, a proper, old-fashioned companion. The kind elderly countesses once employed to push them around the Promenade des Anglais in Nice, fetch their shawl and gently spoon them bouillabaisse," Coles writes.

"He doesn’t need another campaign manager. He needs an aide to keep him upright and make sure he leaves the stage via the correct exit."
Preferably as soon as humanly possible.

Guilty Dog Barks Loudest

The reason so many in Republican Party are freaking out about their phone records before and during Jan 6th is that they know the insurrection was a coordinated attack involving all levels of the Republican Party.

-The White House
-Senators and staff
-Attorney Generals Association
-Major donors

I’m not worried about anyone seeing my phone records around Jan 6th. Are you?
Dear Sen. Scott: tell it to the judge! Who approved the search warrant used to get those records. A standard practice in any criminal investigation. I’m sure you’re fine with it being done in criminal cases where you want someone prosecuted.

(And Rick Scott? Seriously? The man investigated for some of the most serious Medicare fraud in the history of the program? Cry me a river of crocodile tears.)

Or, You Know, Not

we're now a hair away from it being "treason" to utter a single critical syllable about Dear Leader on any topic whatsoever
If it weren’t for that pesky Constitution:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Art. III, cl. 1.

Explain this to me. Everyone knows Trump is full of shit when he warns pregnant women not to take Tylenol, and he is freely mocked for his ignorance. But when Trump propounds new laws as if he were a medieval monarch (even the sovereigns of England haven’t had that power for centuries), without any statutory basis at all, the punditry and the readers of chicken entrails tell us that the heavens quake and the ground upon which we stand is roiled as the end times for the Republic grow nearer.

Why? Trump is no more knowledgeable on law than he is on medicine. And while the language of the Constitution is perfectly plain (as is the law on sedition, which is more generally applicable; but even then, every report on the sedition charges brought after J6 pointed out how rare, to the point of unprecedented, it was to bring such charges, and how difficult they were to prove), the only allowed response to Trump’s idiocy is that all is lost and any condemned (by him) opinion means immediate punishment. The worst case of that I’ve seen so far is Larry Bushart’s incarceration for a month on charges he threatened a school shooting, when he did no such thing. The sheriff first said there was a threat; then he said they knew there was no threat, but the community was concerned. Finally, after the nolle prosequi, the sheriff said he was just relying on the investigators’s report. Which seems to be unsupported by any evidence in the records.

Bushart lost his job because he was in jail for a month. He’s a prime candidate for a civil suit for damages against the sheriff.

That’s a bad situation, but stupidity is not an unknown quantity in law enforcement. I understand even Bondi and Blanche didn’t want to pursue charges against Letitia James (or was that against Comey? Either way…).  His appointed hatchet persons aren’t exactly doing his bidding either, mostly because Trump can’t appoint prosecutors à la Nixon on that fateful Saturday night. Trump may find his Borks, but he can’t give them the authority they need. There is a system, and much as Trump is trying to thwart it, he can’t. Unless and until the Supremes weigh in (if they do), that’s the law of the land. And will the Sinister Six say otherwise? The appointment power is in the constitution (presidential immunity, by contrast, is not). It’s one thing to read power (like immunity) into the Constitution. It’s another thing to read it out. Giving Trump authority to fire government employees and cancel government funding is, in the minds of the Six, actuating the unspoken, unwritten, “original intent” of the Founders (that’s all bollocks, btw). But erasing the appointments clause, which lies behind the statute Trump keeps abusing? I think even some of the Six would draw the line there. 

Until they do, or don’t, that’s the law; and Trump is still constrained by it. He may insist his prosecutors prosecute; but the courts have no obligation to oblige him. Nor to ignore portions of Art. III Trump may find inconvenient.

Be Sure Brain Is Engaged Before Putting Mouth Into Gear

Doesn’t Sean Duffy have some air traffic to worry about? Believe it! So members of Congress are terrorists now? Give who exactly what who wants? How did this guy graduate from Yale? And is he even vaguely aware how much his description sounds like the GOP, which has shut down the House and is refusing to negotiate?
Toyota already builds cars here. They’ve made trucks in Texas since late in the last century. New factories won’t involve converting yen into dollars. That money is already here.

I expect this from Trump, but it’s the entire Administration now. Brain dead zombies would be more effective.

The “Good News”

"Evangel” is the English rendering of a koine Greek word “euangelion” (I’ll be honest, I’m not sure my transliteration is correct, but I’m not where I can check it at the moment).  It means “messenger of good news” and I suspect (I don’t have my OED with me, either), it’s also the source of our English word “angel.” We’ve turn that into a winged person with various powers and responsibilities, but the correct rendering is “messenger.”

Anyway…

Over the centuries, the emphasis on “good news” has waxed and waned, and the gospel has been used more like a club than as an offering. So VP Vance is not as far out of line as one might wish; or as I might think he is. Because “good news” is not at all what he’s promoting.

But he’s certainly offensive. I can’t tell if he’s pandering to right wing MAGA Xians, or just distancing himself from his wife for political purposes. Either way, the idea this clown is going to run for POTUS in 2028 in order to put Trump in the ticket, is laughable. Almost as silly as imagining anyone would win the White House and then step down immediately after being sworn in. The people claiming to be in charge really aren’t very bright.

🐈‍⬛ 🎃




Some of my best childhood memories revolve around Hallowe'en.  My mother's youngest sister, the "crazy" aunt who came to our church Halloween party (this was when I was just barely too old to wander the streets at night with the "children"), put on makeup to look like a corpse in a coffin, and then joined us to bob for apples (probably the first time I'd done that, and I found out what hard, wet work it is.  And what absolutely foolish fun.).  Or just the freedom of wandering the streets at night without my parents in tow, joining all the neighborhood kids of the Baby Boom as we walked from house to house in clumps that gathered and broke again, passing stories of where to get the best candy, or the homemade stuff like popcorn balls and caramel apples, stuff always gone by the time you got there, or always from a house several streets over of undetermined location or ill-defined description.  And the story always included that house being "out" by the time you heard of it.  It prepared us for Christmases when we'd have to find the "IT" toy for our kids in an unforeseeable future.  A future that included my wife dressing up in black tights and leotard she wore in high school, to costume herself as a "cat" for our daughter's first Hallowe'en....oh, wait.  You don't need to hear about that one.

Oddly, this year, I remember that Hallowe’en falls exactly three weeks after my brother’s birthday: October 10.  He’s been gone…3 years now? I should remember, you’d think…and for the over 6 decades I knew him, I never seem to have made that connection. I remember childhood Hallowe’ens with him, now more than ever. But I never made that 3-week connection before.

All the internet bluster about Hallowe'en and Samhain seems to have faded now, as well as the business of Hallowe'en being "stolen" from "ancient practices."  Most of that is echoing remnants of the early 19th century, Romanticism turning into Victorianism.  It was the Romantic movement that began to preserve "folklore," as it came to be called.  "Came to be" not because it was illegitimate, but because it was ignored and despised before the Romantics, who saved it but didn't revive it.  The Victorians then supercharged it, along with fuzzy memories of medieval Europe.  Most of the ghost stories and "monsters" we know now (vampires, werewolves, ghosts, goblins, even witches) are products of the Victorian imagination, not remnants of stories told around campfires 3 millenia ago.  The Victorians tried to link them to an imagined past in order to make them "authentic" in a risingly scientific age, but the connections are horseshit.  Most of those stories are distinctly "modern." Frankenstein was a product of the Romantic beginning of the 19th century; Dracula came out of the late Victorian era, and is a novel at great pains to place itself in its contemporary setting by including what was then cutting edge technology to tell the story. The 19th and early 20th centuries are the great era of our most prized ghost stories including, of course, the stories by Edgar Allan Poe (a man under-appreciated for his narrative gifts, and over-appreciated for his few poetic ones).

Poe's stories were “modern,” most of them conveniently set in a Europe of an indeterminate age when people dressed in what is now costume and ran around in castles and buildings that look more like something from a Disney theme park than reality.  And Poe was writing those in the mid-19th century, in America. Again, the connection to an imagined past gave the stories the verisimilitude they required.

So most of our Hallowe'en is a matter of memory and conjecture, and the stories we tell ourselves.  But it isn't rooted in some "truth" we destroyed with our "enlightenment" or our "progress."  That Romantic nostalgia prompted by the Industrial Revolution which drove us to protect “folklore” became the “truth” we imbued those stories with, the “wisdom” our “modern” era lost. As with most things, our "truth" about these matters is what we say it is.

Hallowe’en began as the vigil for All Saints Day, making it the most well-known vigil for a feast day outside of Christmas Eve. Holy Saturday is the vigil for Easter, still the proper day of the Great Vigil, which can be the most powerful liturgy in Christianity. But popularly, we know only two vigils, and the only service widely known now is the Candlelight Christmas Eve Service, itself moved back from midnight to evening, the better to get us home early and away from church on Christmas Day, even on Sunday. 

Don’t get me started.

So Hallowe’en is actually the vigil for All Saint’s. But we’ve forgotten that.

All Saint's Day, per New Advent, started in...well, here, let me just give you the whole magilla:

In the early days the Christians were accustomed to solemnize the anniversary of a martyr's death for Christ at the place of martyrdom. In the fourth century, neighbouring dioceses began to interchange feasts, to transfer relics, to divide them, and to join in a common feast; as is shown by the invitation of St. Basil of Caesarea (379) to the bishops of the province of Pontus. Frequently groups of martyrs suffered on the same day, which naturally led to a joint commemoration. In the persecution of Diocletian the number of martyrs became so great that a separate day could not be assigned to each. But the Church, feeling that every martyr should be venerated, appointed a common day for all. The first trace of this we find in Antioch on the Sunday after Pentecost. We also find mention of a common day in a sermon of St. Ephrem the Syrian (373), and in the 74th homily of St. John Chrysostom (407). At first only martyrs and St. John the Baptist were honoured by a special day. Other saints were added gradually, and increased in number when a regular process of canonization was established; still, as early as 411 there is in the Chaldean Calendar a "Commemoratio Confessorum" for the Friday after Easter. In the West Boniface IV, 13 May, 609, or 610, consecrated the Pantheon in Rome to the Blessed Virgin and all the martyrs, ordering an anniversary. Gregory III (731-741) consecrated a chapel in the Basilica of St. Peter to all the saints and fixed the anniversary for 1 November. A basilica of the Apostles already existed in Rome, and its dedication was annually remembered on 1 May. Gregory IV (827-844) extended the celebration on 1 November to the entire Church. The vigil seems to have been held as early as the feast itself. The octave was added by Sixtus IV (1471-84).

So, mid-9th century, it got set as a date on the Church's calendar.  That led, later, to All Soul's on November 2.  The connections to Ireland, especially jack o' lanterns (turnips in Ireland, only after a long period exclusively pumpkins, which are as American as corn and tobacco) didn't really come until the 19th century.  Attempted connections between the Irish Samhain and All Saint's are all pretty much retrojection, especially as an attempt to connect Hallowe'en to Irish practices it supposedly overtook. Gregory was a long way from Ireland in the 9th century and Christianity only reached the island in that century.  It's a pretty small tail wagging a pretty large dog to imagine Gregory picked the date for the entire church just to appeal to an Irish pagan festival. I think Patrick was the better evangelist to the island.

The vigil that became Hallowe’en appears in the literature as early as Shakespeare, where the practices of the Roman church were slowly being turned Anglican; but that's another story.  Curiously, most of the literature on Hallowe'en begins in the late 18th century with Robert Burns in Scotland.  It continues in the early 19th century with Walter Scott.  It jumps the pond to Washington Irving's story of Ichabod Crane, where Disney (?; or someone before them) transforms the pumpkin into a jack o' lantern, which made the tale into a Hallowe'en story.  It’s a grand irony that the persecution of single women and elderly widows in 16th century Puritan Salem became inextricably connected to Hallowe’en by Disney, too (“Hocus Pocus”). Thus do we domesticate our worst history and invent our monsters. 👹 

And then we get Poe.  The iconic black cat 🐈‍⬛ of Hallowe'en decorations arguably stems from Poe's story of the same name.  By Poe's time, of course, especially in Puritan tinctured America, the holiday has nothing to do with the Roman Catholic vigil. Poe never set any story at Hallowe’en, and as late as 1937 Edith Wharton sets her last ghost story (she wrote several) on the eve of All Saint’s without ever mentioning the word “Hallowe’en.” But we’ve found great value ($) in doing it in the past half-century, so that now it rivals Xmas Eve and whets our consumer appetite for the year’s end.

Interestingly, the Aztecs and Mayans (and even less remembered groups in Mexico) had festivals honoring the return of the dead.  I can't say for sure the dates of the observances didn't shift after Christians changed the culture, but George Frazer found the Irish expecting the return of the dead around the end of October, which makes sense as people left the fields (farmers first, herdsman as it got too cold finally for the herds) and went indoors to survive the winter.  Thinking of those lost is a likelier custom as winter sets in, especially in Europe.  It seems to be have been as true in tropical Mexico, where the current Dias de los Muertos has very distinct roots in the culture of Mexico.  Many of the practices of the days extend into pre-colombian times, including the idea that the children who have departed return on November 1, the adults on November 2.  Did they adopt the Catholic dates?  Maybe.  It is certainly a festival that is far more "pagan" than it is "Christian."  Not that there's anything wrong with that!

I noted one year there's still no concerted "War on Hallowe'en," even as Hallowe’en has become more and more an adult celebration. (I’ve also had reason to notice that Hobby Lobby starts selling Xmas and (less so) Thxgiving merchandise in September; but ignores Hallowe’en altogether. It’s an interesting lacunae for a store that sells Marvel superhero merchandise, and jigsaw puzzles with scenes from “National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation.” Their tolerance for Xmas merchandise makes up for the dearth of Hallowe’en merchandise.) The idea that the vigil marks the “thin place” where the dead and the living can meet and walk together is, in this post-Victorian world, sadly turned into a time of terror, not comfort. Dias de Los Muertos is a time of celebration because the dead, the loved ones we have lost, are again close to us. Hallowe’en is a time of terror, because the dead are again close to us. We used to visit graveyards and put them near the churches we’d visit at least once a week. Now we avoid cemeteries because they remind us our death is inevitable. 

I doubt the vigil of All Saint’s started as a night of deepest darkness to be dispelled by the light of day, as in Fantasia’s “Night on Bald Mountain.” I’m sure like Christmas Eve, the vigil was looking forward to the feast day, anticipating one of the joyous feast days of the year. There’s a reason it’s one of two popular vigils, even as both are almost wholly divorced from their religious roots. The popular explanation today is that we like to be scared at least once a year. But scared of what? The dead? The reminder of our mortality? Of the evil people (and only people) do?  Of the memories of our loved ones? Or the example of the saints?

I have lamented the changing face of Hallowe'en. (Pro tip:  when you can link to posts that are over 15 years old, you've been at this too long.)  I have layered Hallowe'en into the more important rituals/holy days of our modern American calendar.   I still think some reasonable connections can be made there.  I'm going to try (again!) to keep that in mind as we move toward Advent.  (Is Hallowe'en the gateway to Advent?  Or just to All Saint's, which prepares us for the liturgical year's end?)  I've commented on the "razor blades in apples" stories, though I think the reference there (to a Salon article, of all things) is less reliable than other information I have which provides a more specific date to the origin of all those stories.

As I said, one of the earliest full mentions of Hallowe'en and its attendant celebrations is the poem by Robert Burns that I've posted before on October 31.  I'll continue that tradition this year.  Consider this just prelude, as Hallowe'en itself is prelude to All Saint's which, I would argue, is prelude to the end of Pentecost (the season of, I mean), and in that way preparation, itself, for Advent.  Which is preparation, too.  But there I go, getting ahead of myself again.

Mostly, Hallowe'en is for fun.




So Is This The 9th…

... or the 10th war Trump has ended?

I need a scorecard….

They Really Can’t Hear Themselves: A Continuing Series

Which American citizens is this “federal power “ not supposed to be used against? Rich, white,
male ones?

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

J.D. Vance Tells A Student:

 “Blow you, Jack! I got mine!”

Vance spoke at a Turning Point USA rally on Ole Miss' campus. During a question-and-answer segment, one student asked about Vance's views on legal immigration and a merit-based immigration system. The student also mentioned that his girlfriend is a legal immigrant studying at the school who wants a green card.

"My honest view is that right now America, thanks in part to the Biden border invasion and in part to bad immigration policies, but right now we have let in too many immigrants to the United States," Vance said. "That is just a fundamental reality."

"You asked about your girlfriend, and I don't know the full details of your situation, but my view is that there are people who want to come to the United States and enrich America, but we have got to get our overall numbers way down," Vance said. "I am married to the daughter of immigrants...I do believe that some immigrants can come here and enrich America."

"But, here's the problem. We don't even know how many illegal aliens we have," Vance said. "I've heard estimates as high as 50 million. When something like that happens, you have to let your society cohere a little bit and find a sense of identity, for all the newcomers to assimilate into American culture. Until you do that, you have to be careful about any additional immigration."
Country’s closed! No more furriners! Especially brown people. We have enough, now.

Vance can certainly replace Kirk for blind offensiveness. But I think he’s offending the wrong people. “Pull up the ladder” is a helluva public policy.

Can’t sleep on the fact he and Trump both have non-native wives.

Clearly that ladder has been down too long.

As We Say In Texas:

 “Thank God for HEB.”

In response to the growing concerns about food insecurity, H-E-B announced a $6 million donation to help feed Texans. The company is giving $5 million to food banks across the state and another $1 million to Meals on Wheels programs that serve homebound seniors.

“H-E-B is proud to stand by our food banks and community partners to ensure no Texan goes hungry,” the company said in a statement. “As the cost of living continues to rise, we remain committed to supporting families in need.”

The grocery chain’s donation comes through its “Food Bank Assistance Program,” which has provided more than 1.5 billion pounds of food since 1982. The money will help organizations like the Houston Food Bank, Central Texas Food Bank, and San Antonio Food Bank restock pantries and deliver meals to seniors.

The Houston Food Bank says it’s already seeing more people turn to its distribution centers amid high grocery costs and lingering inflation. With the threat of SNAP benefits halting, the organization is ramping up outreach efforts.
It’s not a $130 million contribution (which is technically void anyway) that would give military personnel $100 each; but then HEB doesn’t have Mellon family money.

And $6 million is to help a lot of Texans. Something our Senators and GOP representatives don’t seem to give a shit about.

And Yet…

Reporter: A news service has tracked multiple instances of DHS/ICE agents shooting clergy with pepper/rubber rounds.

Johnson: I can't comment on any of those instances. I haven't seen or heard any of those videos. Religious freedom does not extend and give you the right to get in the face of an I.C.E. Officer and assault them
... you haven’t seen any videos? How, then, do you know anything? What, are you too busy doing nothing in D.C.? Trump will take it with him in 2029. Of course they didn’t. A Yale law school graduate, married to (IIRC) an Asian Indian woman. So is it cool if I don’t want his family living next to me? (I can’t even pretend I’d be that ignorant and racist. My niece speaks Spanish. She studied it in college. Is that a mark against her? This man is a blot on the country that gave him so many opportunities.)

Photo Gallery


 “People”? The magazine?

Believe it!
But... Chicago is a war zone! The President said so! (Or was that Portland?)”
I’m retired, and I work harder than that!

😵‍💫

Trump: In the old days, I call it the old days… when you announced good news, the stock market went up. You announced good news, the stock market would go up. Now when you announced good news the stock market goes down.

So they think because of that the interest rates will go up. It is inverse of what it should be. We are going to go back to the way it used to be. When we announce good news, the stock markets are going to go up. That is the way it should be, and we are going to really ride that very hard. When we announce good news, we are not going to have a fed that's going to raise interest rates because they are worried about inflation in three years or something
Trump: It's easy to create government jobs. I can fake the numbers if I want but that's not the way you build a great country. That's what they used to do under the Biden administration, under Barack Hussein Obama. They would say, hire a lot of people so we can make our numbers look good. I do the opposite. These are real numbers

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Leegill Eegil Tommy Tuberville Has Thoughts

Also Sen. Tuberville: Pardon me if I don’t get too upset.

Apparently A World Series Game Ran Long Last Night?

And it caused...
All those kids watching from Florida and Alabama and Mississippi and Texas are going to sleep through their lessons on how Jesus loves chattel slavery tomorrow morning
...a return to status quo ante circa 1970?

Or maybe that’s just correlation. All I know is, everything old is new again, and time doesn’t move forward. It just goes in circles like one shoe is nailed to the floor.

Trump’s Rant To The Troops Wasn’t The Worst Part Of His Trip To Japan

They don’t listen to themselves, do they? That, or they think the baloney really has only one side.

And now, two women I would never talk smack about (ask yer grandpa!):
  And now, the President of the United States, in Japan: Oh, it always gets worse.

Trump Unlocks His Word Hoard

And spews rhetorical vomit all over the troops in Japan.
Trump: "Nobody makes equipment like we do. Nobody makes the ammunition, the weapons, the missiles, the planes, none of it. And if they do, the American sailor stands ready to crush them and sink them and wreck them and blast them into oblivion, right? ... everybody said that I should immediately get the Nobel Peace Award. That statement takes me out of the running."
No clue what he’s talking about. Just the kind of message to take to the troops overseas. A stopped clock is right more often than this guy. What a small, small man. Something about Toyota making cars in America (which they have since the last century) and it has to do with AI. 🤷🏻‍♂️  As soon as the courts let you. Scream loudly and carry no stick at all. He doesn’t care who the audience is, or where. He just needs his narcissistic feed, and his word vomit.

Monday, October 27, 2025

The Cognitive Test Is Very Hard?

Trump: AOC is low IQ. If you give her an IQ test, have her pass like the exams that I decided to take when I was at Walter Reed. Those are very hard… They're really aptitude tests, in a certain way, but they're cognitive tests. Let AOC go against Trump.

The first couple of questions are easy. A tiger, an elephant, a giraffe..
Walk into a bar? This test is hard? For whom? Trump?

Stanford Medicine:
Cognitive and neuropsychological tests measure memory, language skills, math skills, visual and spatial skills, and other abilities related to mental functioning to help them diagnose a patient's condition accurately. For example, people with Alzheimer's disease often show changes in so-called executive functions (such as problem-solving), memory, and the ability to perform once-automatic tasks.

Detailed neuropsychological testing is time-consuming and requires special training, and it usually occurs during a separate appointment with a neuropsychologist. However, during a regular neurology doctor visit, tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) provide a quick way to assess cognitive skills in people with suspected deficits.

These tests examine orientation, memory, and attention, as well as the ability to name objects, follow verbal and written commands, and copy a complex shape. Doctors also use a variety of other tests and rating scales to identify specific types of cognitive problems and abilities.
So, not an IQ test.

If AOC ever did call Trump’s bluff, he would just grumble that the test was “rigged”.
What are they not telling us? Why the POTUS got an MRI, for one. Those are not used for screening, but for diagnosis. I’ve had one done, when surgery to repair a broken bone had to be redone. The surgeon wanted to see what was going on before he opened my foot again. I’ve never had one done as part of a routine physical or other screening procedure. In fact, that’s the only one I’ve ever had.

And it’s reasonable to ask if the scan was for possible cognitive disability. When my father went into cognitive decline, I think it was a CT scan that diagnosed the brain tumor that was the cause. Or maybe an MRI; it’s been awhile, and I was paying attention to other things. Still, we, the people, deserve to know Trump’s true condition (although, traditionally, that information has been withheld).
Or he’d just ignore her.

Yeah, no problems here:
Trump: I won't tell you. But this is a person that called me that said, "Sir, I'd like to make a contribution of any difference needed for the United States military." I said, "I don't know. That could be a big number." and we worked it out. It was about $130 million and he wrote a check for $130 million because he's an unbelievable patriot and that's what it's all about.
Which works out to about $100 per service member. Who did you consult to come up with that number? American GDP is $30 trillion. Where did your number come from? You have to seriously wonder if he knows what he’s saying, or understands who he’s talking to.