Wednesday, January 29, 2025

I Hope They’re Going To Use This Argument In Court

"Your Honor, the government submits OMB Memorandum M-25-14, which rescinds OMB Memorandum M-25-13. That memorandum is no longer in effect, but the Presidebtial EO’s freezing federal funding are because King ‘X’ and droit de seigneur, and Presidential immunity and you only enjoined the OMB memo Hah! Fooled ya! And besides your injunction is invalid because you didn’t say “Mother, may I?”

The government respectfully submits that we have run rings ‘round logically, and we win because we’re too clever for you, and besides the Court is infected with Marxist equity and probably cooties.”

1. The executive orders did *not* freeze federal funding. 
2. The Monday OMB memo *did* freeze federal funding. 
3. OMB rescinded Monday’s memo, thereby rescinding the funding freeze. 
4. The EOs (which did not freeze federal funding) are still in effect—and, for these purposes, irrelevant. 
Sigh.
Meanwhile, the monkey is still chasing the weasel around the mulberry bush: I’m not saying the Professor is wrong,”; but neither is AG James: A) CALLED IT! (🤦‍♂️)

B) Well, until February 3, anyway;

C) (The issue remains: who gets to decide how the money is spent?)

D) Am I right that Alina Habba is White House Counsel?  ‘Cause that would explain a lot.

These clowns make sacks of hammers look smart.

No comments:

Post a Comment