... I believe Pam Bondi on this. But I also believe this is accurate:Dear @RepRaskin
— MM (@adgirlMM) February 11, 2026
Please note that Pam Bondi just said she didn't know anything about the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security prison. On camera.
Save that for evidence when we restore justice in America.
So is this:“Gentlemen, this is what we trained for. I know a Mexican cartel attack when I see one.” — Pete Kegsbreath pic.twitter.com/TN4EcL11cj
— Hoodlum πΊπΈ (@NotHoodlum) February 11, 2026
Unless you get re-elected and that lets you duck the criminal charges, so you can pardon everyone who did what you wanted them to do that day.Jim Jordan: "You have a right to protest in the street, but that doesn't give you a right to go into the Capitol and disrupt Congress" pic.twitter.com/OHGZvraxYj
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 11, 2026
They really are determined to gut the DOJ, aren’t they? (POTUS appoints with advice and consent of the Senate. Statutes provide for interim appointments by federal judges when the prior interim (also allowed by statute)* expires without a Senate approved replacement. But the DOJ is asking the Supremes to gut the statute and the appointments clause on unitary (read “imperial”) presidency grounds. The Constitution neither provides for forbids presidential immunity, so Roberts didn’t strictly ignore the Constitution. The DOJ’s position would require the Court to (effectively) declare the “advice and consent” portion of the appointments clause unconstitutional, while also declaring the statute unconstitutional. That’s what DOJ is playing for here. And it’s the country and justice that suffers.)Judges don’t pick U.S. Attorneys, @POTUS does. See Article II of our Constitution. You are fired, Donald Kinsella. https://t.co/XUYRgaqG2T
— Todd Blanche (@DAGToddBlanche) February 12, 2026
No comments:
Post a Comment