Pretty sure that’s all underway.“A prolonged campaign against Iran could also produce a failed state with enriched uranium, destabilize crucial oil routes, threaten Gulf allies, trigger a refugee crisis, and disrupt the global economy.” https://t.co/HbQQosOgF9
— Jonathan Lemire (@JonLemire) March 2, 2026
🚨🚨Trump's lethal, interventionalist presidency -> No president in the modern era has ordered more military strikes against as many different countries as Trump.
— Jim VandeHei (@JimVandeHei) March 2, 2026
He's attacked seven nations, three of which — Iran, Nigeria and Venezuela — had never been targeted by U.S.…
Trump's lethal, interventionalist presidency -> No president in the modern era has ordered more military strikes against as many different countries as Trump. He's attacked seven nations, three of which — Iran, Nigeria and Venezuela — had never been targeted by U.S. military.
Turner says Rubio said the administration wasn’t targeting Khamenei and it was Israel that killed him.
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) March 2, 2026
Trump, meanwhile, says “I got him.” pic.twitter.com/p8DEcF1Aer
WaPo: the mood inside the Pentagon is "intense and paranoid"
— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) March 2, 2026
Pentagon leaders worry the US will expend its air defense stockpiles, and the conflict will "spiral out of control"
This is precisely what Pentagon Joint Chiefs Chair Dan Caine warned of last week pic.twitter.com/bxWuW3RVCv
Not according to our Resolute Leader:CNN: We're told that Pentagon briefers did make a stark acknowledgment, and that was that there was no indication that Iran was preparing to preemptively strike U.S. Bases pic.twitter.com/mBrjsPh14h
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 2, 2026
"We had very serious negotiations, and they were there, and then they pulled back,” he said. “They wanted to make a nuclear weapon, so we destroyed them completely, but we found they were in a totally different site — totally different — because the sites that we took out were permanent. They tried to use them, but they were totally, as I said correctly before, obliterated, right? So then we found them working on a totally different area, a totally different site, in order to make a nuclear weapon through enrichment — so it was just time.”The build up was masdive, and took werks. You don't assemble that kind of firepower and then say "Never mind."
“I said, ‘Let’s go,'" he added.
Polling conducted by Reuters/Ipsos Saturday and Sunday found just 27 percent of Americans approved of the strikes, but Trump said he believes the public broadly supports his decision.Because, of course he does.
“I think that the polling is very good, but I don’t care about polling," Trump said. "I have to do the right thing. I have to do the right thing. This should have been done a long time ago."Once again, he’s Nixon in the late ‘60’s. Nixon was referring to a war, too. Except that war, in the’70’s, had more support than this one does, now. Especially considering McGovern ran in ‘72 on the premise of getting America out if foreign wars, and got shellacked. And Trump promised to not start any wars, but he’s started several, including a war on American citizens.
“I don’t think the polling is low,” he added. “Look, whether polling is low or not, I think the polling is probably fine. But it’s not a question of polling. You cannot let Iran, who’s a nation that has been run by crazy people, have a nuclear weapon. I think people are very impressed with what is happening, actually. I think it’s a silent — if you did a real poll, the silent poll — and it’s like a silent majority.”
No comments:
Post a Comment