Monday, May 26, 2025

Memorial Day 2025


Memorial Day didn't start as a day to honor veterans who "died for our freedom." Ironic, because the last war fought "for our freedom" before WWII, was the Civil War. We had a lot of wars in the 19th century, most of which we ignore: the Spanish American War, the Mexican War, the war in the Philippines, the war in Panama, all the imperialist efforts Mark Twain decried and Henry David Thoreau protested. Memorial Day was not a day to remember we'd won our freedom at the expense of others; it was a day simply to remember dead family members, those who had died in the Civil War. It started with ladies in the South, after the Civil War.  They had done it before the war ended, and after the war they honored the Union dead as well as the Confederate dead.  They honored the living by honoring the dead. It was "Decoration Day." They went to the graveyards and decorated the graves (my wife still does, for her family members; but year round, not one day a year).  They weren't as afraid of death as we are now.

Now we set aside the dead, except as abstractions who "won" our "freedom."  They "died for our freedom."  Is that what the crosses mean?

Bollocks. Our freedom wasn't threatened in Vietnam, or Korea, in the Persian Gulf, either time we fought there in the last 40 years. It wasn't threatened by the sinking of the Maine or in the Philippines, either. It was threatened in the Civil War, and Memorial Day came from that conflict. Memorial Day is simply a day to honor the dead. Perhaps we would better to limit it to the dead we know, and if we don't know any war dead, to be respectful of those who do. Perhaps we would do better to remember the uncut hair of graves, and to visit a graveyard and remember these dead were once as young and fair as you, or me.   I am old and cranky now, but I am sure we used to be more mature about these things.

A child said, What is the grass? fetching it to me with full hands;
How could I answer the child?. . . .I do not know what it is any more than he.

I guess it must be the flag of my disposition, out of hopeful green stuff woven.

Or I guess it is the handkerchief of the Lord,
A scented gift and remembrancer designedly dropped,
Bearing the owner's name someway in the corners, that we
may see and remark, and say Whose?

Or I guess the grass is itself a child. . . .the produced babe of the vegetation.

Or I guess it is a uniform hieroglyphic,
And it means, Sprouting alike in broad zones and narrow zones,
row zones,
Growing among black folks as among white,
Kanuck, Tuckahoe, Congressman, Cuff, I give them the same, I receive them the same.

And now it seems to me the beautiful uncut hair of graves.

Tenderly will I use you curling grass,
It may be you transpire from the breasts of young men,
It may be if I had known them I would have loved them;
It may be you are from old people and from women, and
from offspring taken soon out of their mother's laps,
And here you are the mother's laps.

This grass is very dark to be from the white heads of old mothers,
And I perceive they do not come from the roofs of mouths for nothing.

I wish I could translate the hints about the dead young men and women,
And the hints about old men and mothers, and the offspring taken soon out of their laps.

What do you think has become of the young and old men?
What do you think has become of the women and children?

They are alive and well somewhere;
The smallest sprouts show there is really no death,
And if ever there was it led forward life, and does not wait at the end to arrest it,
And ceased the moment life appeared.

All goes onward and outward. . . .and nothing collapses,
And to die is different from what any one supposed, and luckier.--Walt Whitman

"The beautiful uncut hair of graves." We used to put our graves beside our churches, so we knew where our dead were. Now in our sanitary ways, and our sanity, we keep them as far from the beaten path as possible; along with our hospitals, our nursing homes, our "funeral homes." We don't want to be reminded of death, unless it is on TV, and involves the death of "bad people." Or just the unknown faceless ones; not our friends; not our neighbors; not, ironically, our families.

The Gettysburg Address should be linked to Memorial Day, too. It was written, after all, to commemorate a graveyard, and the dead who died in battle and lay there now.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that "all men are created equal"

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it, as a final resting place for those who died here, that the nation might live. This we may, in all propriety do. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow, this ground -- The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have hallowed it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here; while it can never forget what they did here.

It is rather for us, the living, we here be dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that, from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here, gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve these dead shall not have died in vain; that the nation, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people by the people for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Lincoln praised those who died in a valiant struggle to preserve the union, to keep the nation from ending.

 "I wish I could translate the hints about the dead young men and women,/And the hints about old men and mothers, and the offspring taken soon out of their laps./ What do you think has become of the young and old men?/What do you think has become of the women and children?" I think: "A wise man who speaks his mind calmly is more to be heeded than a commander shouting orders among fools." I think: "Wisdom is better than weapons of war, and one mistake can undo many things done well." (Ecclesiastes 9:17-18, NEB)

I think this is a day to praise famous women and men, and for believers to remember their Creator, and to honor the dead not for what they fought for, but because they, too, were God's children.

Let us now sing the praises of famous men,
all the heroes of our nation's history,
through whom the Lord established his renown,
and revealed his majesty in each succeeding age. Some held sway over kingdoms
and made themselves a name by their exploits.
Others were sage counsellors,
who spoke out with prophetic power.
Some led the people by their counsels
and by their knowledge of the nation's law;
out of their fund of wisdom they gave instruction.
Some were composers of music or writers of poetry.
Others were endowed with wealth and strength,
living peacefully in their homes.
All these won fame in their own generation
and were the pride of their times.
Some there are who have left a name behind them
to be commemorated in story.
There are others who are unremembered;
they are dead, and it is as though they had never existed,
as though they had never been born
or left children to succeed them.
Not so our forefathers; they were men of loyalty,
whose good deeds have never been forgotten.
Their prosperity is handed on to their descendants,
and their inheritance to future generations.
Thanks to them their children are within the covenants-
the whole race of their descendants.
Their line will endure for all time,
and their fame will never be blotted out.
Their bodies are buried in peace,
but their name lives for ever.
Nations will recount their wisdom,
and God's people will sing their praises.

--Ecclesiasticus 44:1-15, NEB


My uncle fought in World War II; with the French Resistance, if memory serves.  Or maybe not. Maybe that was a grand embellishment by the family, or my own early imagination.  He never said anything about the war, or about war, to me; except once.

I went to visit him after I'd married and his kids, my age, my cousins I all but grew up with, had all married, too.  So it was just my wife and I and my aunt and uncle; the first time I'd experienced such an arrangement.  Odd are the passages from childhood to adulthoos.  He picked us up at the airport.  I was reading Studs Terkel's then new oral history The 'Good' War. The quotes around "good" weren't too apparent in the cover design, and he asked me what I was reading this time (in those days I was always reading).  When I showed it to him, and told him it was about World War II, he said, "I didn't think there was such a thing as a 'good' war."  And he smiled; the kind of smile that always made me think he knew much more about much more than I did, or ever would.  A smile of experience, but of deep, painful knowledge he would never unlock and share again.

My brother-in-law fought in Vietnam.  When everybody else was going to college so as not to get drafted, he volunteered.  He was Green Beret, and a Captain.  He's never told me anything about Vietnam, either, except that when he first arrived there it was the most beautiful country he'd ever seen.  And within 10 minutes, he knew the U.S. had no business being there.  But he did his job; he followed orders.  He was a good soldier, and he's one of the finest men I know.  He's as kind, generous, and open-minded as anyone can be.  He's realized belatedly he suffers from PTSD.  Too many stresses in life since the war bring back the buried guilt of coming home when good friends he knew, didn't.

I have a recording of the "Airborne Symphony," by Marc Blitzstein.  Maybe it's the first performance, because the narrator is Orson Welles.  I always think of it this time of year, because the most poignant part of the libretto is the section about bombs, and the cities destroyed by planes.  It's "The Ballad of the Cities."  The narrator reads a partial list of cities destroyed by bombs, but the music moves into the "Morning Poem" with the chorus singing plaintively and repeatedly:  "Call the names.  Call the names.  Call the names."

It always seems to me the only appropriate observance of Memorial Day.  Call the names.

On this day when the Orange Ass is braying about his accomplishments while standing among the hallowed dead in Arlington Cemetery, it is best we turn away from him, and seek peace.


PEACE

O Christ, Son of the living God, have mercy upon us.
Thou that sittest at the right hand of the Father, have mercy upon us.
Arise, O Christ, and help us,
And deliver us for thy Name's sake.

AMEN.

O Christ, when thou didst open thine eyes on this fair earth, the angels greeted thee as the Prince of Peace and besought us to be of good will one toward another; but thy triumph is delayed and we are weary of war.

SAVE US AND HELP US, O LORD AND MASTER.

O Christ, the very earth groans with pain as the feet of armed men march across her mangled form.

SAVE US AND HELP US, O LORD AND MASTER.

O Christ, may the Church, whom thou didst love into life, not fail thee in her witness for the things for which thou didst live and die.

TEACH US TO DO THY HOLY WILL, O LORD AND MASTER.

O Christ, come to us in our sore need and save us; 0 God, plead thine own cause and give us help, for vain is the help of man.

SAVE US AND HELP US, O LORD AND MASTER.

O Christ of God, by thy birth in the stable, save us and help us;
By thy toil at the carpenter's bench, save us and help us;
By thy sinless life, save us and help us;
By thy cross and passion, save us and help us.

SAVE US AND HELP US, O LORD AND MASTER.

Then all shall join in the Lord's Prayer.

Our Father, who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.. For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

--The E&R Hymnal

Arlington Cemetery, Memorial Day, 2025

Donald Trump, Memorial Day, 2025:

During a Monday speech at Arlington National Cemetery, Trump spoke about the "American heroes and their immense and ultimate sacrifices" before bragging about his own good fortune.

"250 years, we're going to have a big, big celebration, as you know, 250 years," the president said of a military parade on his birthday. "In some ways, I'm glad I missed that second term where it was, because I wouldn't be your president for that, most important of all."

"In addition, we have the World Cup and we have the Olympics," he continued. "Can you imagine? I missed that four years, and now look what I have. I have everything. Amazing the way things work out. God did that."

Trump said he wanted to take "credit" for the 250th anniversary of the Army, but crowed about two other events instead.

"You know, I got the World Cup and I got the Olympics," he remarked. "And I said, boy, it's too bad. I won't be president then. And look what happened. I turned out, and we're going to have a great time."

"But most important of all is the 250th anniversary," the commander-in-chief added. "That blows everything away, including the World Cup and including the Olympics, as far as I'm concerned."

Jeremiah, 7th century B.C.E.

 Woe to him who says,

"I shall build myself a spacious palace

with airy roof chambers and

windows set in it.

It will be paneled with cedar

and painted with vermilion."

Though your cedar is so splendid,

does that prove you a king?

Think of your father: he ate and drank,

dealt justly and fairly; all went well with him.

He upheld the cause of the lowly and poor;

then all was well.

Did not this show he knew me? says the Lord.

But your eyes and your heart are set on naught but gain, set only on the innocent blood you can shed,

on the cruel acts of tyranny you perpetrate.


Jeremiah 22: 14-17 (REB)


Micah, 7th century B.C.E.

With what shall I come before the Lord

    and bow down before the exalted God?

Shall I come before him with burnt offerings,

    with calves a year old?

7 Will the Lord be pleased with thousands of rams,

    with ten thousand rivers of olive oil?

Shall I offer my firstborn for my transgression,

    the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?

8 He has shown you, O mortal, what is good.

    And what does the Lord require of you?

To act justly and to love mercy

    and to walk humbly with your God.

Micah 6:6-8

The word of the Lord.

We've been down this road once or twice before.

A Good Day To Stay Away From The News

Sunday, May 25, 2025

“Donald Is Unhappy!”

He's also firm about his tariffs: Or, you know, just promise to “talk.” Cheaper, too.

I Know It’s A Shock After “All The President’s Men”..

 


When Robert Redford made heroes of Woodward and Bernstein, but the press is not here to save us. Never has been; never will.

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up

I was wondering if Jake brought his book up. I was not disappointed. And then Johnson admitted he wasn’t worried about Trump because if you’re corrupt in public, it means it’s not criminal.
MIKE JOHNSON: Important distinction -- the Biden crime family earned that title ... President Trump does everything out in the open.
You can’t make this stuff up. Unless you’re a politician.

Saturday, May 24, 2025

Cognitive Dissonance Is A Cruel Mistress

MAGA responses (all two them) insist on the FBI part, but either drop, or don’t notice, the connection to Patel and Bongino. I think it’s how they separate Trump from his stupidity. Like this: The sad part is believing those “gold cards” exist because Trump said so. To whom, for example, is the $5 million paid? Trump?  People already paid him millions in fees for worthless crypto to “have dinner with Trump.” Which ended up being bad food and Trump giving a rambling 25 minute speech before he left the building.  Leaving a roomful of suckers. 

Like MAGA.

I’m Sure This Post Is Antisemitic

An Israeli airstrike hit the home of a doctor in Gaza on Friday and killed nine of her ten children.

Dr Alaa al-Najjar, a paediatrician in the Nasser Medical Complex, was at work when the strike hit her home in the Qizan Al-Najjar area, south of Khan Younis.

One child and her husband survived, but were severely injured and in intensive care. The youngest child killed in the attack, Sidar, was less than 12 months old.

The mother of ten, had left home early that morning to work with her husband, who is also a doctor at the Nasser, driving her to work.

Just minutes after he returned home, a missile struck their house. The eldest of the nine children who died, Yahya, was 12 years old. Their bodies brought into the morgue of the hospital where Al-Najjar works.
But it’s okay, because:
An Israeli military spokesman said on Saturday that an aircraft struck “a number of suspects who were identified operating from a structure adjacent to IDF troops” in Khan Younis.

“The area is a dangerous war zone. Before beginning operations there, the IDF evacuated civilians from this area for their own safety. The claim regarding harm to uninvolved civilians is under review,” he added.
It’s not like somebody was shot on the streets of D.C.  Somebody with hopes and dreams and family and stuff. Somebody with ties to Israel…instead of Gaza.

The Newspaper Of Record

 

 
Yes, the NYT. But it’s okay; the statement was well sourced:
See? A guy who wrote a book and was on a podcast says Apple engineers talk about it! Why, that’s verification the New Yorker would kill for!
NYT Tomorrow: The assertion in our recent article that black people are more prone to violence was not a racial or genetic stereotype, but based on the reported experiences of six LAPD officers we surveyed at their retirement homes in Idaho
Not (surprisingly) the Pitchbot.

As I Was Saying…

 


I don’t really think Trump has this authority (then again, he’s not trying to fire the Fed Chair, so maybe he does). But the inequities of this one just scream for a suit by Apple challenging it.

Eh. We’ll see how interested Apple is in eating the tariffs.

But Biden Didn’t Recognize George Clooney

I know, I know, the dead horse is dead.

But Jake Tapper is still shilling his shit book, so I’m gonna ride George Clooney into the ground and maybe dig a trench, too. Because Trump is just phenomenally stupid, but nobody except cranks on the intertoobs (👋) can point it out.

(Trump thinks jets move the way old WWII planes fly in the movies. During the Covid shutdown the Blue Angels (?) flew over several Houston hospitals in tribute to the workers there. By chance their flight path crossed near enough to the house that the Lovely Wife and I caught a glimpse of them going by from the backyard. Their speed was incredible, and truly by the time we saw them (we happened to be looking in the right place), they were gone. You don’t track such planes by sight (aside from the fact they never fly that low in combat); you have to do it by radar (obvious, I know; but when you see them like that, unexpectedly, and gone almost before you recognize they were there, the obvious becomes grounded in experience). What can barely be seen by the eye can long appear on radar. Which, of course, is what “stealth” design is all about.

Now think about how you have to go through that much reflection yourself to properly understand just how stupid the POTUS is right now. And we only have one at a time. God help us.)

Now What?

 Good point:

Stunning. May was brutal for Trump in federal court: 96% loss rate ⚖️. Even GOP-appointed judges have ruled against the admin 72% of the time. District courts are doing their job defending the Constitution. Soon the Supreme Court may be the only court unwilling to defend the rule of law.
And if won’t be the first time in American history the Supreme Court is athwart the law. Dobbs is Dred Scott redux, IMHLO. But that one already seems to be so far in the rear view mirror it might as well have been an age ago. I was just reading a handful of analyses trying to fix blame for our situation without actually fixing blame, and it all came down to “narratives” and FoxNews and “right wing media spheres” and other such boogeymen. Ignore the people at town halls, ignore the millions in the streets over and over and over again, ignore the polls, and in true internet fashion navel gaze at what’s on Twitter and what the usual suspects (Fox News, courtesy of ubiquitous video clips on Twitter) said.

I sometimes think FoxNews has a bigger audience on social media than it does on cable. And I’m quite sure the people who gave Trump the majority vote in 2024 (and wouldn’t now) are not endlessly discussing the matter on Twitter or BlueSky.

But the interesting question is: what are the Supremes gonna do? There are indications they realize they’ve created a Frankenstein monster. They want to overrule Humphrey’s Executor, but they don’t want Trump meddling with the primal forces of the Federal Reserve. I guess even the majority on the Roberts Court have stock portfolios. They want to protect the “unitary executive,” but that executive is a toddler with a shotgun, not the genial but Alzheimer’s addled Ronnie Reagan. They want to stick to their ideology, but it’s increasingly out of step with reality and the rest of the courts in the country. How far do they go in utterly ignoring the rule of law the lower courts are working hard to enforce?

At what point, asks the “existential” question, do they toss their legitimacy to the winds?

Dred Scott and Plessy v Ferguson at least had solid support among the slave states in pre-13th and 14th Amendment America. (And I still think we need an amendment overturning Trump v U.S. That’s the whole reason Trump thinks he’s invisible and bulletproof and running the world.) The Court has handed down even more damaging opinions which were likewise later reversed, but which were never as notorious as those two. The Court has, in other words, repeatedly threatened its own legitimacy. It is doing so again. 

The 14th and 15th amendments were written to overturn Supreme Court opinions. Unfortunately the 15th depends too much on enabling legislation, which the Roberts Court has disallowed. Perhaps we need an amendment to fix that, too. (We had to repeal Prohibition, we can certainly strengthen the 15th.) But it may be time to rein in the Roberts Court, to reject their rule the way we finally rejected the rule of the Tawney Court. The Supreme Court is supreme in title only. It is not supreme over we, the people. And it is not entitled to impose its version of the Presidency upon us without our consent. We can alter that by altering the Court under the next Democratic president.  More justices, staggered terms, forced withdrawal from the bench after a certain age (as we do fur trial judges), even an Amendment to alter the language of Article III, if necessary. We can rein in the Court and remind them who actually holds the whip hand. 

You will say thus could threaten a “good court” like the Warren Court, but that Court was the exception that proved the rule.  Besides, Brown v Board is more honored in breach than in the keeping, and about all that remains of their criminal rights rulings is the familiar Miranda warning we all know from TeeVee. Most of the rest has been whittled away without anyone even noticing. As a society we constantly revert to the mean, to status quo ante. The Court can’t ever save us from ourselves. But it can do us a great deal of harm. 

And we can save ourselves from that.

Friday, May 23, 2025

Leopards Eating Cellphones Party

"The leopards weren’t supposed to eat my face!,” cries the faceless guy who voted for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party candidate.
“All the dairy farmers who voted for Trump were under the impression they weren’t going to come on farms and take our guys,” one farmer said. “It’s happening more than we’d like. It’s scaring the farming community and we’re like, ‘This wasn’t supposed to happen.’”
And nobody could have foreseen:
Federal immigration authorities say they are not targeting Vermont’s $3.6 billion dairy industry, which is responsible for 63 percent of the milk produced in New England," the report said. "But the recent arrests are prompting some in the sector to wonder how it would survive without its undocumented labor force."

The report quoted Vermont's Secretary of Agriculture as saying, "I think our farmers are concerned about the well-being of their workers. That’s foremost. They’re also concerned if (the workforce) was to go away, who’s going to do the work? Who’s going to milk the cows?”
Besides, the price of “groceries” is going down, isn’t it? Well, until it goes up again.

And since I can’t let it go:
And no market for those cellphones, because the price will be so high no one will buy them.

I really expect Apple will sue over this “tariff.” Even at 25%, it’s cheaper than setting up a plant in America (years; damned things aren’t built by “automation”). By that time, Trump is gone (if Congress doesn’t rain on his tariff parade starting in ‘27). Apple can easily outlast him.  And eat some of the 25%, if they have to.

But there’s a very real question whether Trump has this authority; and whether Congress can even give it to him. It that theory cracks the door open (at least 3 lawsuits are trying to), expect Apple, and many others, to consider putting their shoulders to it.
Grok: "It is not feasible for U.S. Steel to add 70,000 jobs in 2025. A more realistic scenario, if the Nippon deal proceeds or tariffs boost demand, might see a few thousand direct jobs created over several years, supplemented by indirect jobs in related sectors. The steel industry’s structural shift toward automation, combined with labor shortages and modest demand growth, makes a workforce expansion of this magnitude implausible in the near term."
It’s not that AI is per se right, but that Trump is just such a fucking idiot. And so fucking delusional. Two conditions that often appear alike.

Send Her To China

"…then they came for the white people…”
Belgium’s Royal Palace said Friday that Princess Elisabeth, who is first in line to the throne, is waiting to find out whether she can return to Harvard for her second year after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a ban on foreign students at the university.

The Trump administration on Thursday revoked Harvard University’s ability to enroll international students in its escalating battle with the Ivy League school, saying thousands of students must transfer to other schools or leave the country.

“We are looking into the situation, to see what kind of impact this decision might have on the princess, or not. It’s too early to say right now,” said the palace’s communications head, Xavier Baert.

Baert said that Princess Elisabeth, aged 23, has completed her first year of a graduate school program at Harvard and would spend the summer back in Belgium. “And we’ll have to see what happens next year,” he said.

The princess is the first of four children born to King Philippe and Queen Mathilde, and has been studying for a Master in Public Policy. Last year, she obtained a degree in history and politics at Lincoln College at Oxford in the U.K.
It’s not like we need good relations with the future queen of Belgium, after all. Even if she is white. She ain’t American.

Who Will Rid Us Of This Meddlesome Toddler?*

*In accordance with the law and Constitution, of course. It all depends on how Trump feels that day. Moment. (And there’s nothing he can do to make “the country “ eat it. But that’s not dementia or sheer idiocy because…Joe Biden didn’t tell us he had cancer. Until he did. Oh, and a bad debate performance. It only takes one. Although Trump has had several…)

But Biden used an autopen. At some point in 4 years. Jake Tapper will not consider that dementia until at least 2029. It’s important we time these things carefully.

In the meantime, let us ask where the fuck Congress is.
Or that. It’s a string of sentences; but taken together, or each separately, it’s complete gibberish. If my father had ever talked this way, I’d have sought (and gotten) a conservatorship in a very short order.

Where the fuck is Congress?
Except there is no spoon deal. And now my head hurts. Knows not, and knows not that he knows not. In perpetuity. Congress knows better than this. Or they have staff who can explain it to them. Committees which can hold hearings and get information about this. As paranoid as Pete Hegseth, and just as dumb.

Where the fuck is Congress?

I’ma Take These Three Comments…

...from here:
The irony is rich that part of DHS' demands includes ensuring "viewpoint diversity"...
--NTodd
The xenophobia of this administration is already starting to harm colleges. Yesterday I saw an article how Union College, a small liberal arts college in upstate NY failed to meet its goal for students attending next autumn. The shortfall was mostly foreign students scared off by Trump. The college is going to have to dip into its endowment to cover the costs that previously would have been bourn by foreign students paying full tuition. Next year for most colleges will be worse, the number of graduating seniors will be substantially less than this year, it will be 18 years from the 2008 recession, a consequence of the downturn being a drop in the birthrate. Unlike previous recessions, the birthrate never recovered when the economy improved. The drop is students is particularly difficult, because the families that stopped having children where most often those in the middle class that send their kids to school. The double whammy of less foreign and less US students will likely drive a number of smaller, regional, liberal arts colleges under. Harvard and Yale have massive endowments and sufficient prestige that they won't lack for students and money, but outside of that thin layer of wealthy and competitive schools, the loss of students is going to very difficult in the long term (and surprisingly short term too.)
--rustypickup 
It is no end of wild to realize these people, offered the choice of sharing a comfortable couch, would take the dunghill so long as they had it to themselves. Human nature can be a really twisted thing.
--jim, some guy in Iowa 

And let this be the extended context:
Somebody’s feeling their oats, who really shouldn’t be. I won’t say it’s a price we pay. The same idiots and sentiments were loudly expressed during the Vietnam War. They had to be reminded what a touchstone the 1st Amendment is for this country. It was not a fun time.

I really thought we’d left “America, Love It Or Leave It,” in the’70’s.

I should have known better.

Non-Americans Go Home!

American education for Americans, taught the American Way!
Noem is the numbskull who thinks habeas corpus is a legal principle that permits Trump to deport foreigners. The order was predicated on the pre-textual claim that Harvard is fostering antisemitism, when in fact the antisemite in chief, Donald Trump, invited the two leading antisemites in the U.S., Nick Fuentes and Kayne West, to have dinner with him last year at Mar-a-Lago.

As evidenced by all the surrounding circumstances, including most notably the Trump administration’s letter to Harvard on April 11, 2025, Noem’s order is a blatant authoritarian effort to take control of Harvard. The April 11th letter demonstrates the Trump administration’s goal to dictate who can be admitted, what courses can be taught, what professors they can hire and who should be disciplined for exercising their First Amendment right to free speech under the Constitution.

Today, Harvard sued Trump to nullify Noem’s order. The lawsuit correctly alleges that Noem’s order is “clear retaliation for Harvard exercising its First Amendment rights to control Harvard’s governance, curriculum and the ‘ideology’ of its faculty and students.” Harvard will likely move for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to stop the enforcement of Noem’s illegal order. 

This motion will start the process to remove Noem’s order permanently. After the TRO, Harvard will ultimately move for a permanent injunction. The process will be similar to the one the law firm Perkins Coie pursued in permanently reversing Trump’s unconstitutional executive order against the law firm.

But for the Supreme Court’s opinion last year granting Trump presidential immunity for “official acts,” Trump’s and Noem’s actions would violate federal criminal law for defrauding the government. By basing their order on an official order from Homeland Security, their actions constitute immunized “official acts.” Since the Supreme Court ruled that a prosector cannot get behind the true motive and intent of the “official act,” even if it evinces a criminal purpose, there is no way the criminal law can hold accountable Trump and Noem.

Regardless of court intervention, the damage created by Trump’s actions will have a negative impact on the ability of Harvard and other American universities to attract the best and brightest. This move, along with the Trump administration’s massive cuts on research, will create a significant brain drain that will only benefit our foreign adversaries. Already, a major Chinese University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, is offering to enroll the international students who cannot stay at Harvard. Bottom line, this will only serve to make China great again. MCGA.

Educating international students is critical for developing U.S. soft power that educates the best and the brightest from overseas, many of whom return to their counties and assume leadership positions. Rather than being exposed to American democracy, they will instead be indoctrinated with Chinese authoritarianism.
American authoritarianism for American students!

"Revoking Harvard’s certification is unlawful many times over," the judge wrote in her order. "It is a pillar of our constitutional system that the government cannot 'invok[e] legal sanctions and other means of coercion' to police private speech, especially when the government’s treatment is animated by viewpoint discrimination. The government’s effort to punish the University for its refusal to surrender its academic independence and for its perceived viewpoint is a patent violation of the First Amendment."
The Administration still thinks this is their winning propaganda point:
"If only Harvard cared this much about ending the scourge of anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators on their campus they wouldn't be in this situation to begin with," Jackson said. "Harvard should spend their time and resources on creating a safe campus environment instead of filing frivolous lawsuits."
I suspect most Americans are still worried about the price of eggs; and gas; and rising costs at Walmart.

First World Problems

 The New Yorker has just published a long article on the Israeli embassy staff members senselessly murdered on the streets of D.C. The subheading to the article is:

Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky were killed without regard for who they were, or what they believed.


The same can be said of the anonymous 10 year old boy who went out to get bread for his family in Gaza, and died because of an Israeli bomb. Except we don’t know his name, or what he believed. And we probably never will.

War is hell. Collateral damage. So many died. Murder is different.

Round up the usual excuses.

“Who Is My Neighbor?”

 


Luke tells us the man who asked that question was “seeking to justify himself.”

Thursday, May 22, 2025

“Don’t Trust Anyone Over 30!”

 MAGA logic:

Young House Democrats demanded what Axios called an "age reckoning" on Thursday after a third Democrat died while in office, with some remarking that President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" passed through the chamber this week, and the "difference is the number of members who passed away."

Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-TX), 70, Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), 77, and Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), 75, all died since March, the latest being Connolly, who died Wednesday and was the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee. Eight Democrats have died since November 2022, according to Axios.
Grijalva and Connolly both died of cancer within a year after starting treatment. Turner was treated for cancer in 2022, but was working until the day before he died.

So, by the logic of the “young House Democrats,” we should bar all former cancer patients from running for Congress. We can’t do that by law, so let’s do it by party pressure! State by state, district by district! It’s genius! What could go wrong? Candidates have to submit an extensive medical history before they can be placed on the primary ballot. Win-win!

We can’t do it by age because old people die anyway! We have to be reasonable, and do it by medical history! And then by age! People with “bad” medical histories can be allowed to be on the Democratic ballot until they are 70, and then they are banned because they’ve already lived too long! We could move on to ban people on prescription drugs for chronic conditions (they might die!) and people who wear glasses (weakness!). We can’t just project strength, we have to prove strength! It’s the only way to avoid electoral inconvenience and the anxiety of losing a close vote!

We gotta make democracy safe for the world and more comfortable for young people! Never trust anyone over 30!