Wednesday, November 06, 2019

It's a Defense AND an Excuse!


Is it just me, or does this not make any sense at all?

“We have the fact that they didn’t know the aid was held up at the time of the call and Ukrainians took no action to get the aid released,” he said. “None of that has happened. It’s all based on what someone told someone.”

Just before Jim Jordan said that, he said this:

“If one witnesses says there’s no quid pro quo but multiple others say there is, what do you do with that?” the reporter wondered.

“We’ve got the transcript where there’s no quid pro quo,” Jordan replied, referring to a White House memo that Democrat believe shows a clear quid pro quo.

Jordan added: “We’ve got the two people on the call, President [Volodymyr] Zelensky and President Trump saying no quid pro quo.”

What someone told someone is that Trump wanted a favor from Zelezny; that's in the "transcript" Jordan is talking about.  And Trump says there was no quid pro quo, which is precisely "what someone told someone."

This postmodernism as a political argument is making my head spin, and I used to do that stuff for a living.  At least it's better than Lindsay's "Trump is too stupid to be crooked" defense.  Or this one:


Let me keep it as simple as Sen. Kennedy wants it to be:  legal means it's in the national interest, and is done in a manner that it could be placed on a billboard, if necessary.  Illegal is when it is done in the political interests of the President (why else does he care about what Joe Biden got up to years ago in Ukraine?) and is so improper it inflames almost everyone who heard the call, or heard about it, and caused the counsel for the NSA to put it on a secure server so nothing about it could leak.  (And if would have worked, too, if not for that meddling whistleblower!).

Simple enough for you, Senator?

Looking Backward

Put these two tweets together and "2016 on steroids" is not shaping up to be 2016 in 2020.

Postmodernism Rules

It is well known that facts are stupid things. And besides, in a postmodern world there are no facts, only opinions.

And opinions are like that thing that everybody has; so how much do they really matter, either?

QED, right? Trump defender logic.

It's Really Not The Results That Matter

Mr. Blue

The Republican candidate for governor was DOWN by double digits in Mississippi?

You don't really need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.

Tuesday, November 05, 2019

Night of the Long Knives


If Trump is wounded by Kentucky, blood will be in the water, and the "invincible" leader whose tweets make women faint and strong men quiver with fear, may quickly turn into a mouse who should be driven from the party's house.

If Trump can't turn out his base to win in Kentucky, if Trump is in fact the motivating factor that turns out Democratic voters in the states he touches with his magic winkie, this could be trouble for Trump in the Senate:

If Trump is driving the wrong voters to the polls, of what use is he?  What terror does he hold, what power does he sway?
Republican Senators can read these tea leaves, too.
No shit, Sherlock.  The only question now is:  do they calculate it's worth going to the bitter end?  Or do they cut their losses and staunch the bleeding?  There isn't another election between now and November 2020.  Time to decide.

Still Having Too Much Fun


That's the super-genius who is going to put Trump nav in the White House. And just to repeat myself:
And one to go out on:
Say goodnight, Gracie!

Trump Has A Clear Pathway To Victory In 2020




And The People Say: "Amen!"

Rand Paul Doesn't Want the Constitution Getting in the Way


Lindsay Graham doesn't want the facts disturbing his beautiful mind.

Nice government ya got here.  Be a shame if yahoos and thugs were in charge of it.

The Senator Who Doesn't Understand The 6th Amendment

Doesn't understand how a criminal investigation is conducted.
Or the very Constitutional concept of "reasonable suspicion." Which actually bars a criminal investigation, or any public investigation, based on nothing more than "We don't know unless we ask."

That is the very un-Constitutional concept of "guilty until proven innocent."

Do Tweets Trump Sworn Testimony?

I think we're gonna need a court ruling on this.

OTOH

Will this be the same caliber of lawyers as the one consistently getting their asses handed to them in court?

Cuz that'd be cool.

Because really, what else is left?

Next: is Santa Claus real?

That was then; it exists now.
Mark Meadows soldiers bravely on:
I'm guessing he hadn't read the part Sondland added later today.

WHERE ARE THE TRUE FACTS?



WHERE IS THE WHISTLEBLOWER?!



Dear Sen. Dr. Paul


“That is the clear definition of bribery,” [Leon Panetta] said. “And it’s a clear definition of what constitutes a violation of the president’s oath. So this is just additional evidence that when you look at the testimony, when you look at the facts here, it basically supports a charge against the president that he was deliberately misusing his office of the presidency.”

And Bribery is in the Constitution:

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.  (Art. II, sec. 4)
You've heard of the Constitution, right?

Who's starting the crowd-fund?


...to pay for this library's NYT digital subscription?

Totally lit!


But nobody saw this coming:

QPQ's are good!  QPQ's are not the same as bribery (they so are!).  QPQ's don't matter if they're inchoate!  Besides, the "transcript" was "perfect"!   Ohhhhh, fuckit!

(and here it is:


Really is a helluva thing to forget.)

Sen. Dumbass is a Dumbass


Let's go to the text!

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
According to the Office of Legal Counsel, the POTUS cannot be subjected to a "criminal prosecution."  Impeachment is not a "criminal prosecution."  This is clear from the plain text of the Constitution, and from case law.

And in a case involving a whistleblower, the "witnesses" are the documents revealed to the public.  Trump is not in trouble because of what the whistleblower said.  He's in trouble because the documents that were referenced have been released (by Trump) and the allegations of improper conduct/abuse of power have been substantiated by witnesses who are not anonymous nor protected from disclosure by federal law.

And impeachment of a President is set out in Art. I, sec. 2 and 3, and Art II, sec. 4.  You've heard of the Constitution, right?

The Secret of Our Success

What do you do with information like this?

For one thing, get back to me after Super Tuesday. It still two months to Iowa, ya know.  Things change.  It's why we have primaries, instead of the last poll standing.

For another, what are the alternatives?  Biden is Hillary as a national candidate.  She had her baggage, he has his.  Joe may be a real avuncular guy and have name recognition out the wazoo.  People may still be trying to figure out how to pronounce Buttigieg's name (much less spell it), and still confuse Elizabeth Warren with Kate McKinnon, but when Joe's campaign leaves the pre-primary debate stage and enters the voting booth, he'll crash and burn.  You know he will.  He's Joe Biden.  He no more deserves the nomination because Obama than Hillary did because Bill.  Joe has crashed and burned at this before; why is now his "time"?

Besides, is Florida gonna be more comfortable electing a gay man to the Oval Office?  Or a woman not Elizabeth Warren?  Or an Asian guy who keeps buying his way onto the debate stage as surely as Tom Streyer does?  I mean, the whole premise here is Florida, man.  Right?

I agree the Dems can't lose California, but do they have to bend the rules of space-time to get a candidate who will win in Florida?  If that's the calculus, we're already calculating another Hillary-bot candidate.

Every four years the candidate field either looks bleak and apocalyptic, or the candidate is a lock and might as well start picking colors for the Oval.  Trump won four years ago because of low turnout.  The key to Democratic victory is to not let that happen again.

There is no other key than that.

A Thanksgiving Horror Story

So say we all!

I wasn't going to do this, but....



I'm supposed to be nice about televangelists and hucksters for Jesus.  Sometimes I just can't.  And I suppose the evangelical vote is literally lost to Trump:


I'm just not sure how important that vote is.  Besides:
It's incentive for the rest of us to vote.

The Morning in Polls




Monday, November 04, 2019

It's All About The Narrative


Except when it isn't.

Old Man Shouts At Clouds


Listening to The 1A today, the topic was democracy and voting and the troubled state of American politics.  One of the panel members was a student at Yale, speaking eloquently about the "disconnect" between voters and politicians:  a majority of voters support gun control in some form or fashion, but politicians won't even bring a bill to the floor of Congress for debate.  (This evening on All Things Considered they ran a report on the gender gap between men who tend to favor "2nd Amendment remedies" and "prying mah gun (I typed "fun" and had to correct it; I'm not quite sure I was wrong) from mah cold, dead fingers") and women, who favor reducing gun violence over protecting gun owners (men are, in general, on the other side of that question, too).  Funny, but he never made the connection between that generalization and all the callers who left messages for the panel to ruminate over.

Almost every caller averred that they weren't going to vote in 2020 because they purity of their sacred franchise would be sullied by contact with reality, and no candidate met their exacting standards for electability (basically they want to elect a Platonic ideal, and were forced to chase shadows.  O, the humanities!), and besides, why bother, nobody listened to them.  Which, of course, is precisely why.

This system has a very basic buy-in:  you don't vote, you don't play.  You want politicians to listen to you?  Vote.  Is the majority of the country in favor of gun control?  Vote.  The gun nuts (sorry, but it's descriptive, not pejorative) vote.  They make sure to give money to the NRA and vote every time the ballots are open.  It's the "silent majority" that doesn't care that much, to vote down the NRA nut-candidate, or vote for a Beto who says he'll do something drastic to reduce gun violence (which "won't work" because no one will vote for it because why bother, politicians don't listen anyway, and besides my vote is holy and pure and can't be preferred to mere mortals who might not do ALL that I want done, even if I don't know what I want done.).  The majority in this country has the power to take guns away from people, if they so choose (I still don't understand why somebody doesn't campaign on taxing ammunition; I really, really don't.).  They just have to vote.

And yet, all we can do is complain about the electoral college (which wasn't so much a problem until Trump won, and he won because people in certain states didn't....what?  What did they not do?  All together now:  VOTE!  Damned right!) or gerrymandering (another favorite reason not to bother with voting) or just because.

I also heard the story, earlier in the day, of a felon in Florida who, at the age of 64, got to vote for the first time in his life (he was incarcerated before he was 18, IIRC, and as a felon was banned from voting for life, because heaven forbid poor people and black people, and most especially poor, black people, get the chance to vote!).  He got to vote once before Florida decided all felons must first pay all fees and fines due for their crimes (reimbursements, fines, etc.), or be guilty afresh of a felony for attempting to vote.  To make it worse, Florida has no central registry recording the charge of such fees and fines, or payment thereof.  So how does a voting official know if you've paid, or not paid?  How do you know what you owe, or don't owe?  It couldn't be more clearly a poll tax if it tried, but it's Florida, man.  And how did that law get passed?  Because people of good will didn't bother to vote because, you know, why bother, they don't listen anyway, and gerrymandering, and so on and so forth.

Tell that to the man who voted for the first time (and last?) in his life, at the age of 64.  His vote was so holy and precious to him (he is a pastor), he took his grandson to watch him vote, and he broke down crying when they showed him to a voting booth.  But he voted.

How the hell can you tell me you can only do less than that?  What excuse do you offer?  That unlike cable TV and streaming services, the ballot doesn't offer you enough selections?  Can we shame such people?  Can we treat them like something we'd scrape off our shoes?  No; it wouldn't help.  But excuses to not vote are worth about as much as "the dog ate my homework" or "my grandmother died (for the fourth time)".  It's time we at least treated it that way, anyway.

If Wishes Were Horses


1) Political campaigns influence voters, else we would have abandoned the nonsense long ago.

2) Indeed, they are so influential the next Presidential campaign starts the day after the election for the last Presidential campaign.

3) And yet the fiction remains that they matter not a bean, only polls matter.

4) No one has a crystal ball that predicts the future. Who had Trump even on their Victory Bingo card at this point in 2015?  Who really expected him to win in November, 2016?  Even Trump didn't.

5) None of the above is proof of anything except that predicting the future one year from now (almost exactly!) is a mug's game.

6)  CAMPAIGNS MATTER!

7) "Should," "could," and "might" (synonym for "maybe," not for Trump's "sword") have no real power or authority, and merely underline the uncertainty of the future.  Again, who knew Trump would win 4 years ago?  And despite the noise on political Twitter, large swathes of the country aren't paying attention to Trump or impeachment or election campaigns which haven't begun yet.

"Keep the government outta mah Medicare!"


Meanwhile, the rest of the country can't wait until their 65th birthdays.

You explain it; I can't.

"Why Doth the Heathen Rage?"


He really doesn't understand that he doesn't speak for himself, but for the nation.

I'm reminded of a scene from "Elizabeth" where she takes the throne upon the death of Henry VIII and then her sister (am I remembering history correctly?  Anyway, she's surprised to be crowned Queen) and the first morning after her coronation the Lord Chamberlain (? Richard Attenborough, anyway!) comes to her chambers and demands to see the royal bedsheets.  He's looking for signs of fluids, blood, etc., because the royal personage now belongs to the state, because Elizabeth now embodies the state.

Trump's position is not much different from that.  In 3 years, he hasn't come close to understanding that.
And confirmed everything the whistleblower reported with that "transcript" (actually a memorandum of record).  As the Psalmist asked:  Why doth the heathen rage?
Except the memorandum you released says it did happen.  So have your public statements, your lawyers public statements, your Chief of Staff's public statements; just to name three.  Then there are all the witnesses; but you don't need them, do you?
If you would release it, we'd be happy to.  I understand it's on a classified server, though.

And if the rest of you think we're going in circles, it's because we are:
 


Message Sent


The appeal went up on October 7, 2019.

Less than a month later.....

But wait, it's the internet:  of course there's more!

The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in Nixon, the Mazars subpoena must be enjoined despite seeking no privileged information and bearing no relation to the President’s performance of his official functions.
Oops.  And the rest of that paragraph pretty much shreds the new claim of "absolute immunity" that Trump is bruiting about:

The Nixon Court explained that even the President’s weighty interest in candid and confidential conversations with his advisers could not justify a blanket privilege that would “cut deeply into the guarantee of due process of law and gravely impair the basic function of the courts.” Id. at 712. 
And for good measure:

Tellingly, although Nixon asserted both a claim of executive privilege and of presidential immunity from judicial process, the Court’s analysis focused almost entirely on privilege. That the Court felt it unnecessary to devote extended discussion to the latter argument strongly suggests that the President may not resist compliance with an otherwise valid subpoena for private and non‐privileged materials simply because he is the President.  

And oh by the way, in a footnote:

12 We note that the past six presidents, dating back to President Carter, all voluntarily released their tax returns to the public. While we do not place dispositive weight on this fact, it reinforces our conclusion that the disclosure of personal financial information, standing alone, is unlikely to impair the President in performing the duties of his office.
And to make sure everyone gets the point:

It is true that the President “occupies a unique position in the constitutional scheme,” Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 749, and we are mindful of the Supreme Court’s admonition that a court should not “proceed against the president as against an ordinary individual,” Nixon, 418 U.S. at 708 (quoting Burr, 25 F. Cas. at 192). For example, historical practice suggests that a court may not compel the President to personally attend trial or give live testimony in open court. See Clinton, 520 U.S. at 692 n.14. In the context of a subpoena, the “timing and scope” of any production from the President must be informed by “[t]he high respect that is owed to the office of the Chief Executive.” Id. at 707. And in holding that a former president was entitled to “absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts,” the Supreme Court quoted with approval Justice Story’s conclusion that the President is not “liable to arrest, imprisonment, or detention, while he is in the discharge of the duties of his office.” Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 749 (quoting 3 J. Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States § 1563, pp. 418–19 (1st ed. 1833)).

But we are not faced, in this case, with the President’s arrest or imprisonment, or with an order compelling him to attend court at a particular time or place, or, indeed, with an order that compels the President himself to do anything. The subpoena at issue is directed not to the President, but to his accountants; compliance does not require the President to do anything at all. 

And by the way:  don't emulate your client and tell lies in public:

14 At oral argument, the President suggested that Nixon either did not think to, or deliberately chose not to, raise an argument of presidential privilege. That is not accurate. See Nixon, 418 U.S. at 706 (noting that “[t]he second ground asserted by the President’s counsel in support of the claim of absolute privilege” is “that the independence of the Executive Branch . . . insulates a President from a judicial subpoena in an ongoing criminal prosecution”); see also Sirica, 487 F.2d at 708 (“Counsel argue, first, that, so long as he remains in office, the President is absolutely immune from the compulsory process of a court . . . .”).
Yeah, that's called "getting poured out," as in "poured out like water."  Nothing Trump's lawyers said had any sway with the Court (well, the Younger abstention issue went against the trial court's opinion, but was not dispositive of issues in the case, so....)
 

Ummm...

Quick question: how many votes does "Wall Street" have? And aren't they all in New York anyway? Besides:
So, again, how many votes does Wall Street have? And "leave the country"? Who are they kidding?

Sunday, November 03, 2019

Everyone Who Didn't

see this coming, please show yourselves out.

Magic Talisman



What's the old schoolyard chant: "Takes one to know one"?
Read the transcript!!!!

Skewed Polls!

Screwed politicians.

Oh, and: of course

I'm more surprised

...this wasn't in the NYT.

Because, unlike the phone call

...nobody else was in on the depositions.

Saturday, November 02, 2019

All of the "Adult" Pundits

...are gonna be SO disappointed on Monday.

At least we have an extra hour tomorrow to feel ashamed of ourselves. Or to enjoy it; whichever.

Stumbling Into Other People's Conversations

True, attempted murder doesn't carry the death penalty that capital murder does. And true, this is a dumb answer; that is, Hume's answer is dumb.

Failed crimes do cost holders of positions of trust and authority their positions. Impeachment, after all, is not a criminal matter, nor is it civil.  It exists in a realm of its own, apart from any judicial system. And its basis us thayvthe office holder has abused the power of the office, through bribery, treason, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Conspiracy to commit a crime is a felony at criminal law, and felony by definition is a "high crime."

Rather like a mandated punishment for any crime, the only punishment possible for an impeachable offense is removal from office.  Because the finding of the offense means removal from office is mandated.

QED.

From the Absurd to the Predictable





Ain't it the truth?

Because Every New Statement

...must be reported as if it completely changes the entire story?#objectivejournalism

About that new GOP "defense"

Maybe not such a good idea....

Not Ukraine!?

Send Rudy back to Kiev, STAT!

Three years later...

The New York Times discovers the Pope is Catholic.

Meditation for All Soul's Day

Morning in America

I guess smugglers aren't"illegal immigrants," right?

Broken Record





Friday, November 01, 2019

One For All The Saints

To quote George Conway: "Nope, Donald Trump isn't a delusional narcissistic sociopath. If course not." A term that applies to people in the public eye other than Trump:
JMM is right.  I still think Trump's insult is slightly worse, even though this one underscores my point that Beto and Trump don't belong in any comparison about the dangers of cults of personality. This is clearly a class its own.

So I Shouldn't Vote For Who I Want To Have A Beer a with?

Something about these two in the same sentence tells me this implied and false equivalency is not the best point to offer this discussion.

Math Is Hard

Peter Baker (NYT) on "Washington Week"  just said a poll showing 49% favor impeachment and 47% oppose us "just like" the vote split in 2016. Ergo: "the country has not moved."

The rest of the panel was too polite to tell him he was being stupid. (The issue of impeachment is not the same issue as who to vote for. That, and "same numbers" don't mean you are measuring the same thing.)

But it does fit into the narrative that every new report changes the story. Even though the story on Ukraine hasn't changed, but the story on what Trump us still doing continues to be revealed (and ignored be because the press is the one who can't walk and chew gum.

Just The First Day In November, or: Scaling Mt. Everest






All Saint's Day 2019


Do I repeat myself/  Very well, then, I repeat myself.  I am old, I lack the energy.

Revelation 7:9-17
7:9 After this I looked, and there was a great multitude that no
one could count, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, robed in white, with palm branches in their hands.

7:10 They cried out in a loud voice, saying, "Salvation belongs to our God who is seated on the throne, and to the Lamb!"

7:11 And all the angels stood around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures, and they fell on their faces before the throne and worshiped God,

7:12 singing, "Amen! Blessing and glory and wisdom and thanksgiving and honor and power and might be to our God forever and ever! Amen."

7:13 Then one of the elders addressed me, saying, "Who are these, robed in white, and where have they come from?"

7:14 I said to him, "Sir, you are the one that knows." Then he said to me, "These are they who have come out of the great ordeal; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

7:15 For this reason they are before the throne of God, and worship him day and night within his temple, and the one who is seated on the throne will shelter them.

7:16 They will hunger no more, and thirst no more; the sun will not strike them, nor any scorching heat;

7:17 for the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd, and he will guide them to springs of the water of life, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."

Psalm 34:1-10, 22
34:1 I will bless the LORD at all times; his praise shall continually be in my mouth.

34:2 My soul makes its boast in the LORD; let the humble hear and be glad.

34:3 O magnify the LORD with me, and let us exalt his name together.

34:4 I sought the LORD, and he answered me, and delivered me from all my fears.

34:5 Look to him, and be radiant; so your faces shall never be ashamed.

34:6 This poor soul cried, and was heard by the LORD, and was saved from every trouble.

34:7 The angel of the LORD encamps around those who fear him, and delivers them.

34:8 O taste and see that the LORD is good; happy are those who take refuge in him.

34:9 O fear the LORD, you his holy ones, for those who fear him have no want.

34:10 The young lions suffer want and hunger, but those who seek the LORD lack no good thing.

34:22 The LORD redeems the life of his servants; none of those who take refuge in him will be condemned.

1 John 3:1-3
3:1 See what love the Father has given us, that we should be called children of God; and that is what we are. The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him.

3:2 Beloved, we are God's children now; what we will be has not yet been revealed. What we do know is this: when he is revealed, we will be like him, for we will see him as he is.

3:3 And all who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Matthew 5:1-12
5:1 When Jesus saw the crowds, he went up the mountain; and after he sat down, his disciples came to him.

5:2 Then he began to speak, and taught them, saying:

5:3 "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

5:4 "Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.

5:5 "Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.

5:6 "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled.

5:7 "Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.

5:8 "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

5:9 "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.

5:10 "Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

5:11 "Blessed are you when people revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.

5:12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

God, he told me, is spiritual, not material; not bread and wine, not flesh and blood. And when I mentioned that was largely the picture of Jesus we got from the gospel of John, he mentioned the letters of John, too, to support his point.

The gospel of John doesn't include what we call the Beatitudes. In John's gospel, for John's community, those blessings have no place. They are too open-handed, too generous, too inclusive. Which is not to say John is not inclusive, that John doesn't know the other gospels. He clearly knew the gospel of Luke. John, like all four gospels, includes the anointing of Jesus before his death; unlike the other three gospels, in John's version the woman who anoints Jesus has a name. She is Mary, and she anoints Jesus in gratitude for raising her brother Lazarus from the dead. Perhaps there is a joke there, for John, because Lazarus is the poor beggar in Jesus' parable in Luke, of the poor man who goes to Abraham, and the rich man who dies and goes to Gehenna. But John had read Luke, because Luke moves the anointing of Jesus from his head to his feet; and Mary, in John's version, bathes Jesus feet with the perfume, the scent of which fills the house. John knew enough about Luke's gospel to know the anointing recorded in Mark and Matthew, had changed in the transmission to Luke.

But John's is not an inclusive gospel; it is almost a gnostic gospel. Those who know, know; those who do not, are Nicodemus; imagining that they know, but understanding nothing. Never mind; they are saved in the end. In the end, Nicodemus is one of those who recovers the body after the crucifixion. Or maybe that is John's joke again, since the body was never Jesus in the first place; since it only appeared to be Jesus.

But in Matthew's gospel, the body is clearly Jesus, and the blessings are clearly concrete; meant to be real, not just platitudes. They are meant to comfort people who mourn now; people who are merciful now; people whose spirit is poor now, and needs encouraging; people who are pure in heart now, merciful now, trying to make peace now. For they will be called "saints." And saints are always people; never ideals; and never plaster. Ideals are not real; and plaster is not human. Saints are human. Saints are real.

The blessings are announced for now; not for some time in the sweet bye and bye. We miss that, too often, because the merciful hardly seem blessed, and the peacemakers hardly seem successful, and the merciful receive no mercy, the pure in heart seem to see nothing except what can't possibly be; and the only promise given is that our reward will be great in heaven; and heaven, despite the peacemakers and the merciful and those who are hungry right now for justice and righteousness, heaven is certainly not here, not now. So the blessings seem to be set aside, promises of a time to come.

No, say the saints. No. No. The blessings are here. The blessings are real. The blessings are pronounced, right now. They take affect here; for you. Now.

The language of this day all sounds like language of what will come, will happen, will be seen one day; but not now:

Then one of the elders addressed me, saying, "Who are these, robed in white, and where have they come from?"

I said to him, "Sir, you are the one that knows." Then he said to me, "These are they who have come out of the great ordeal; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

For this reason they are before the throne of God, and worship him day and night within his temple, and the one who is seated on the throne will shelter them.

They will hunger no more, and thirst no more; the sun will not strike them, nor any scorching heat;

for the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd, and he will guide them to springs of the water of life, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."
We hear those words and we think: "Yes. Yes!" And we want them to be true now; but we know they are not true. We know they cannot yet be true. But the saints admonish us. The saints tell us, remind us, wave their hands before our blind eyes, shout into our deaf ears: "The time is now! The blessing is now! The great ordeal is over and the throne of the Lamb is in front of you right now! The shepherd guides you now! The springs of water wash your feet right now! God is wiping your tears away now, now, even now! Oh, won't you open your eyes and see?! Won't you open your ears and listen?!" And then they weep for us, the saints; the clouds of witness who surround us and know what we know and know what we refuse to know. They surround us and weep and try once again to get our attention, to make us listen, to make us see, to get us just to notice.

O taste and see that the LORD is good; happy are those who take refuge in him.

O fear the LORD, you his holy ones, for those who fear him have no want.

The young lions suffer want and hunger, but those who seek the LORD lack no good thing.

The LORD redeems the life of his servants; none of those who take refuge in him will be condemned.
If you could but taste, then you would see! If you would but taste, then you would hear! Those who seek the Lord lack no good thing. The lives of the servants of the Lord are redeemed! And they are redeemed right now! That is what the saints tell us, and they know! They know, because they are human. They know because they are just like us. They know, because they are saints. And they surround us; and they are here, now.

Samhain is what the Irish once called this time. It was their new year, and the ancestors came back to see them for a celebration. It was when time itself was a "thin place," and the spirits could communicate with the living, and the veil between the two worlds was thin enough to allow communication. For them, the spirits were as real as flesh and blood family members. For us, perhaps even the saints don't seem quite real. The saints seem like the blessed ones, and their blessings seem to have come long after they could enjoy them in this life. But they know what we forget: that the blessings are for life, not for death. Blessings that only come as rewards in the end, are no blessings at all. Blessings that are not for this life, are only cruel promises. The saints know that God is the God of the living, not the dead; and that in God’s sight, all are alive. Which is why this time of year is still a time of celebration, not of mourning. Which is why the great ordeal has passed, and the lamb is with us now. And why the ones who seem so little, and have so little, and struggle to be merciful and make peace and keep pure hearts, are blessed right now, and not later, not as a reward for being stubborn or persistent or for simply hanging on. The struggle has passed. Blessed are we; right now. That is what the saints know.

The saints are flesh and blood and bone, as Jesus was; and they know what our struggles are, as Jesus did, and they know what our hope is; and that is what sets them apart from us. But not for long; never for long; and they don’t want to be set apart, they want to be with us, they want us to be with them. They are here, now, in this “thin time” they are as near as our next breath, and they know: the blessings on the merciful, and the mourning, and the pure in heart; on the peacemakers and the meek and the ones who are so hungry and thirsty for righteousness they are sure they can just taste, and if only they could be satisfied! They know, the saints, the wise and humble and loving saints, that we are with them, right now; and that we are blessed. Right now. And they want us to know it, too. For all the saints. God willing, we’ll see that we’re ones, too.

Because that’s what it means, to be children of God. The saints, look just like you. Have hands, and hearts, and eyes, and ears, and mouths, shaped just like yours. And that is your blessing, now, and evermore. Because you are merciful. Because you are meek. Because, whether you know it or not, your heart is pure. Because you will never stop being hungry and thirsty for righteousness. Because you know it is there, that it will come, that it will be done. Because you know, the great ordeal is no ordeal at all. Because you know, that you want everyone else to know this; and to know they are blessed.

For all the saints. And you are one, too.

Amen.

The Anti-Kaiser Soze

Yeah, and how's that working out for him?


All Saint's Day 2019


For all the saints, who from their labors rest

For Catholics All Saint's Day is a day to honor the saints; All Soul's Day remembers all who have died in Christ who are not considered saints.  For Protestants, the "saints" mean the clouds of witness who we believe surrounds in time and across time, as well as space.  According to most reports Samhain was one of the "thin places" in the calendar, when the dearly departed were yet close at hand, not as ghouls and ghost and goblins, but as family.

Later in the year the German church observed, at least the German immigrants in this country, the Totenfest, the remembrance of the dead, the faithful who had died in Christ in the past year.  We will mark it again, on the last Sunday of Pentecost (if, to be honest, I don't forget to remember), which this year will be on November 24th.

It's all about death and resurrection.  Although those terms might not mean what you think they mean.

Almighty and everlasting God, before whom stand the spirits of the living and the dead; Light of lights, Fountain of wisdom and goodness, who livest in all pure and humble and gracious souls.

For all who witnessed a good confession for thy glory and the welfare of the world; for patriarchs, prophets, and apostles; for the wise of every land and nation, and all teachers of mankind,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

For the martyrs of our holy faith, the faithful witnesses of Christ of whome the world was not worthy, and for all who have resisted falsehood and wrong unto suffering or death,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

For all who have labored and suffered for freedom, good government, just laws, and they sanctity of the home; and for all who have given their lives for their country,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

For all who have sought to bless men by their service and life, and to lighten the dark places of the earth,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

For those who have been tender and true and brave in all times and places, and for all who have been one with thee in the communion of Christ's spirit and in the strength of his love,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

For the dear friends and kindred, ministering in the spiritual world, whose faces we see no more, but whose love is with us for ever,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

For the teachers and companions of our childhood and yough, and for the members of our household of faith who worship thee in heaven,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

For the grace which was given to all these, and for the trust and hope in which they lived and died,

WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD, AND BLESS THY NAME.

And that we may hold them in continual remembrance, that the sanctity of their wisdom and goodness may rest upon our earthly days, and that we may prepare ourselves to follow them in their upward way,

WE BESEECH THEE TO HEAR US, O GOD.

That we may ever think of them as with thee, and be sure that where they are, there we may be also,

WE BESEECH THEE TO HEAR US, O GOD.

That we mave haev a hope beyond this world for all they children, even for wanderers who must be sought and brought home; that we may be comforted and sustained by the promise of a time when none shall be a stranger and an exile from thy kingdom and household;

WE BESEECH THEE TO HEAR US, O GOD.

In the communion of the Holy Spirit, with the faithful and the saints in heaven, with the redeemed in all ages, with our beloved who dwell in thy presence and peace, we, who still serve and suffer on earth, unite in ascribing:

THANKSGIVING, GLORY, HONOR, AND POWER UNTO THEE, O LORD OUR GOD.

Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit,

AS IT WAS IN THE BEGINNING, IS NOW, AND EVER SHALL BE, WORLD WITHOUT END. AMEN.

Foolish Hopes

I'm beginning to hope I'll live long enough to catch up with the majority if the electorate, an electorate that will be much younger than me.

I'm at the younger edge of those who know from living history what "Soviet-style" means, and I've never been in political step with that crowd. It may be the younger generation and I will make common cause.
That would be a fine irony.