Mulvaney lawyer statement > pic.twitter.com/pWHAVkIVxy— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 27, 2020
You know, there's a way to settle that argument.Pam Bondi on Bidens/Burisma: "We would prefer not to be discussing this. But the House managers have placed this squarely at issue, so we must address it."— Zeke Miller (@ZekeJMiller) January 27, 2020
Does he know we can hear him?CUOMO: So you did ask Ukraine to look into Joe Biden?— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) January 27, 2020
GIULIANI: Of course I did. https://t.co/qyvwDA5VUg https://t.co/ultUqQIlYh
Which, again, is a statement we could test by putting him under oath and cross-examining a witness. Oh, of only we had a way to weigh and assess and determine the truth of contradictory statements and witnesses who change their stories! Woe is us, that we lack such fora*!VP Chief of Staff @marcshort45 issues statement that "at no time did he hear Pres Trump tie aid to Ukraine to investigations into the Biden Family or Burisma," Short says @POTUS was frustrated about US aid to Ukraine and corruption there & those were the only issues @VP raised.— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) January 27, 2020
Yes! Precisely so!so if i am understanding correctly, a fair process should happen neither in public nor behind closed doors, not with witnesses nor without witnesses, quickly but in due time, neither by day nor by night— Alexandra Petri (@petridishes) January 27, 2020
*It's the right plural! Get over it!
No comments:
Post a Comment