Monday, May 15, 2023

“McCavity’s Not There!”

Man with hammer sees imaginary nails.
For example, Durham rehashes his allegations against Michael Sussmann, the then-Perkins Coie attorney who was accused of lying to an FBI official to get the bureau to open an investigation. Sussmann was acquitted and doubt was cast at trial what role his meeting played in sparking the FBI probe, but Durham claims undeterred that Sussmann prompted the case’s opening.
Ignoring a trial verdict for your own preferred narrative is a very Trumpian move. One must ask: is Trumpism contagious.?

Pounding sand for the benefit of the future:
This report does not recommend any wholesale changes in the guidelines and policies that the Department and the FBI now have in place to ensure proper conduct and accountability in how counterintelligence activities are carried out,” the report reads. 
He instead says that it’s all about “integrity,” and that he simply did his work to help the attorney general decide “how the Department and the FBI can do a better, more credible job in fulfilling its responsibilities, and in analyzing and responding to politically charged allegations in the future.”
Lock 'em up!
It echoes in concept if not in tone one of Trump’s favorite complaints about the Trump-Russia investigation, or really any attempt to examine or hold him accountable in any way: that it’s unfair. 
In this context, Durham raises the issue of which campaign received a defensive briefing from the FBI in 2016 and which did not, and also publicizes potential 2016 investigations into the Clinton Foundation which, he says, immediately went nowhere. 
This, of course, is in contrast to the Trump-Russia investigation, which went on for years and resulted in the convictions of his campaign manager, national security adviser, and others. 
“Furthermore, while the Department appears to have had legitimate concerns about the Foundation investigation occurring so close to a presidential election, it does not appear that similar concerns were expressed by the Department or FBI regarding the Crossfire Hurricane investigation,” Durham writes.
This does read like very special pleading. What did Durham find? 





[The correct answer is: "bupkis."]





The following would also be acceptable.
And the problem was?

1 comment:

  1. He looks like what happens when a Kentucky colonel breeds with a Connecticut Yankee insurance actuary. And his work proves that is more than skin deep.

    ReplyDelete