...when the fetus is not viable or the health of the mother is at risk should be unthinkable because…women. Amirite?Lankford: it’s not just about making abortion illegal in the country, I would tell you I’m working on making abortion unthinkable pic.twitter.com/a7J8g7UqID
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 24, 2023
"I would like to say 'This book is written to the glory of God', but nowadays this would be the trick of a cheat, i.e., it would not be correctly understood."--Ludwig Wittgenstein
"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards."--Soren Kierkegaard
Tuesday, January 24, 2023
A Medical Procedure…
NYT: How The Pence Classified Documents Hurt Joe Biden
Even though the cases are markedly different, we must erase those differences in the interest of being “objective.”The @nytimes does a lot of great journalism all the time. What they do consistently horrible is this straight-news-as-pundit analysis. https://t.co/QeOAbwYqoa
— Jordan Acker (@JordanAckerMI) January 24, 2023
😹😹😹😹
Because of course they do.Trump’s legal team thinks Pence having documents changes everything: report https://t.co/llfC4wU4W6
— Raw Story (@RawStory) January 24, 2023
It was announced on Tuesday that unknown to Pence, among the items taken from his time in the White House were a few documents that were marked classified. Pence, like President Joe Biden, immediately contacted the FBI and handed over the information.
The Trump team thinks that it will make it difficult for prosecutors to justify bringing charges against the former president without charging Pence and Biden.I want to see them use the "But Mikey got to do it!" defense in court. I really do.
Cruz has jumped the shark.TED CRUZ: The FBI needs to search the University of Delaware and Hunter Biden's home and business addresses
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 24, 2023
LARRY KUDLOW: What about Pence, a friend of both of ours, who found classified documents in his home?
CRUZ: Oh look, Mike Pence has explained where these came from pic.twitter.com/VZwobf8RZl
By the time of the first criminal trial, Trump will just be a whimpering blob of protoplasm.narcissists present a facade of invincibility, superiority, 'smartness' and invulnerability. but in times of crises, when this front is penetrated, they crumble in a process of disintegration referred to as "decompensation." as shown here: pic.twitter.com/4k2xhkpW9t
— The Ghost of GC 🌻 (@gtconway3dg) January 24, 2023
"Why Did Mike Pence Wait So Long to Reveal His Stash of Classified Documents?"https://t.co/lRZnk5Jf1o
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) January 24, 2023
I don’t much care that Pence didn’t immediately run to the press to announce the documents, but it is the kind of thing that journalists who are good at horse race coverage, unaware of many of the thus-far distinguishing details about the Trump documents, and ill-equipped to cover classified documents stories latched onto with Biden.
Until we have answers about some of the details that currently distinguish Biden and Pence from Trump — like whether they knew of the documents (both claim they did not), whether they ever accessed the documents after leaving office, whether we have reason to believe they’re harboring more — this should not be a story.
And the key difference, one that should be included in every story that tries to make such a comparison, is that Trump refused to give documents back, whereas Biden and Pence freely offered them up.
The reason that’s important, aside from the both sides drama of it, is that it is an element of the offense that would be most likely to be used if DOJ took the unprecedented step of charging a former Original Classification Authority with harboring classified documents.
As we can now see, it happens that men who have aides pack them up at the end of their tenure go home with documents they didn’t know they had. It happens. (By the time Kamala Harris leaves, there’s likely to be a new protocol in place, so Harris can set a perfect record as the first woman being packed up.) What matters — what distinguishes a mistake from a potential crime — is what you do with the documents when you become aware you have them.
Clearly This Is The Most Important Thing Our Leaders Can Apologize For
Since many young soldiers and junior staffers have gotten in real trouble over the years for mishandling classified documents, it would be nice if big shots who have been equally careless would APOLOGIZE, instead of just telling us how great it is they’re now following the law.
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) January 24, 2023
This Is Bad News For Biden
Oh, dear, what can the matter be?Mike Pence attorney finds classified documents at ex-vice president's Indiana home: report https://t.co/fhujixclR9
— Raw Story (@RawStory) January 24, 2023
IMHLO
And then he went on from there:He has the right, but not the ability, to remain silent https://t.co/nXXEnB2hzB
— George Conway🌻 (@gtconway3d) January 24, 2023
With many people on the line on what was a PERFECT call protesting the Rigged Georgia Election, which I have a clear right to do, and in fact an obligation to do since I made the call as President, how come not one person said, while on the call, that I acted inappropriately, or made a statement of protest at what I said, & then slammed down the phone," said Trump. "Not one, even with so many opposing people, lawyers, and others on the line. NO ADMONISHMENT at all. We nicely agreed to speak again…"
"That was the call to Georgia," he continued. "It was PERFECT, nothing done or said wrong. We agreed to continue our conversation at a later date. The other call, that was probably taped by them illegally, was so good that when the Washington Post heard it, they did a retraction and apology because they were fed false information, perhaps by the Secretary of State’s office, and they were angry about it! The Election in Georgia was RIGGED AND STOLLEN. We have all the evidence needed. That is the CRIME!"The Georgia election was rigged AND a delicious German Christmas bread! I’m guessing we’ll find out it was a floor wax and a dessert topping, too!
— Ann Telnaes (@AnnTelnaes) January 24, 2023Perfect. Almost textbook criminality, IMHLO.
Good-bye Pork Pie Hat
“He’s not surrounded by a jury of his peers, a jury of people from Arkansas, a place where he came from.”
— Eric Kleefeld (becoming a parody of myself) (@EricKleefeld) January 23, 2023
6th Amendment: “the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.” https://t.co/ckzxsN1TGN
His quibble that DC “isn’t a state” is also handled in the Constitution, Art. 3 Sec. 2: “but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.”
— Eric Kleefeld (becoming a parody of myself) (@EricKleefeld) January 24, 2023
Laws have long said, crimes by out-of-towners are tried in DC.
Yeah, this guy’s appeal has already failed.I mean, what next? Somebody takes a trip from Arkansas to DC, robs a liquor store while they’re in town, then hire this lawyer to insist it has to be tried back in Arkansas?
— Eric Kleefeld (becoming a parody of myself) (@EricKleefeld) January 24, 2023
Monday, January 23, 2023
Or…
It may look like the system for maintaining classified documents is pretty much shit.My latest for @msnbc on Biden/Trump classified docs -- and why the court of law isn't the only court that matters in this case https://t.co/oMgZVM5wEn
— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) January 23, 2023
Tell Me Again The “Fight” Is Not To Control Women
Totally the party of individual liberty, right? https://t.co/64m5SzSpb8
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) January 24, 2023
The Bubble Is Real
"When we say DC is ‘wired’ for the GOP, this is [it]. The elite press caters to Repubs to ward off charges of bias. Dems cater to the approbation of the elite DC press. That creates the permanent tilt in the political and media ecosystem."
— Eric Blair🔥- protecttruth@mastodon.online (@protecttruth_) January 23, 2023
Yes. @joshtpm:https://t.co/ccHqhwrDfn
.@joshtpm: "What we see from the likes of Durbin and more than a few others is a consistent tendency to burnish their own reputation among DC opinion makers rather than advance a set of policies, values and political goals voters elected them to advance"https://t.co/kzVKV6zf6O
— Joe Sudbay (@JoeSudbay) January 23, 2023
And while we’re on the subject of speaking to the press incoherently:There's a telling comparison to be made between powerful Republicans rallying around an obvious train wreck of a house freshman while high ranking Democrats can't wait to tell the press about their concerns with the sitting President.https://t.co/LPb3Q7MWJh
— Schooley (@Rschooley) January 23, 2023
Yeah, that’s not even vaguely correct in the law. Which already tells you how the appeal will go.seems like he may be coming up short on the remorse front https://t.co/a1mN7Iz377
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 23, 2023
Sunday, January 22, 2023
The Four-Cylinder Of His Mind Is Missing A Sparkplug
Or two.After Silk goes on and on about how much she loves Trump and all the great times they had together, Trump gets up and says this: “I knew Diamond, but I didn’t know Silk at all. I just learned about Silk. You’re fantastic.” pic.twitter.com/jgReN5hW5C
— Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 (@RonFilipkowski) January 21, 2023
Four: The Importance Of The Classification System Is Highly Overrated
Watch the donut, not the hole.Three things can be true:
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 22, 2023
1) We need a far better system to track retention/return of properly classified documents.
2) Biden’s carelessness is deeply problematic, even if others have been similarly careless.
3) Trump‘s obstructions and prevarications are still far, far worse.
Paying The Piper
Trump's lawyers better pray he doesn't skip out on paying his $1 million penalty -- here's why https://t.co/Vi6rE7juPz
— Raw Story (@RawStory) January 21, 2023
Tl:dr here is Trump and some of his attorneys are jointly and severally liable for the sanctions recently imposed in federal court. Trump took that seriously enough to drop the other frivolous suit he had before the same judge.Lawyer warns there will be a 'hellish price to be paid' if attorneys take on Trump as a client
— Raw Story (@RawStory) January 21, 2023
"Trump’s conduct will not change.”https://t.co/leEyEwDyYR
“Hang It All, Robert Browning!”
“There can be but one ‘religious liberty!’/But religious liberty, and my religious liberty?"This isn’t surprising coming from Becket — which has, among other things, previously questioned the sincerity of lots of people’s religious beliefs (including mine).
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 21, 2023
But it seems rather sharply inconsistent with any claim to be invested in protecting “religious liberty” as such.
Couldn’t Have Said It Better Myself
The more Biden cooperates on the document searches, the more stories insisting the scandal is out of control.
— Schooley (@Rschooley) January 22, 2023
I think the truth will turn out to be that classified document handling is not nearly as locked down as people would assume, and as with all flaws in the system, Trump had unparalleled skills in finding them for criminal ends.
— Schooley (@Rschooley) January 22, 2023
And yeah, this is pretty much a Beltway bubble story:Does whoever is in charge of these documents know what "classified" means? @lesdoggg pic.twitter.com/nFxi0mwEmn
— The Daily Show (@TheDailyShow) January 22, 2023
Like most Dems have been, @SenatorDurbin is an embarrassment on this issue. Shld be ashamed of himself. Dems play to the desires of the DC press. https://t.co/ikGtsEMazS
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 22, 2023
Which brings me back to Leslie Jones: who is controlling these documents?BREAKING: Most Americans think both Biden and Trump inappropriately handled classified documents, but in weighing their severity, a plurality of the public believes Trump's actions were more serious, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds. https://t.co/UXONL8ajRZ
— ABC News (@ABC) January 22, 2023
Is The U.S. Gov't Designating Too Many Documents As Classified'?https://t.co/mUNO1JDCSP
— Mary Holm (@maryfranholm) January 22, 2023
Historian Matthew Connelly says government records are marked as "classified" three times every second — and many of them will never be declassified. We talk about what that means for the public and how this might change. His new book is The Declassification Engine.I think that gets us a little closer to an answer.
Fools Rushing In
Yeah, “apparently” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. It’s also covering a lot of assumptions which may, or may not, be borne out by the DOJ investigation. But why wait and let inconvenient facts get in the way?Biden’s apparent mishandling of classified documents is a disaster. It may not be as willful and corruptly intended as Trump’s, but it’s nevertheless a serious breach of the responsibilities he undertook in his prior roles.
— Ian Bassin 🇺🇦 (@ianbassin) January 22, 2023
Saturday, January 21, 2023
“WHY ISN’T BIDEN BEING MORE TRANSPARENT????!!!???
JUST IN: DOJ searched Biden’s Wilmington home last night, the White House reveals. pic.twitter.com/BxjsI2ZiJq
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 22, 2023
Neither the WH statement nor the one from the president’s personal attorney seem to make clear whether this search was court-authorized or subject to some kind of non-voluntary warrant/legal process.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 22, 2023
UPDATE: A White House official confirms this search was not the subject of a warrant or court-authorized process. Totally voluntary.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 22, 2023
This search was yesterday. These reports are coming today. And they are incomplete and fragmentary, answering all possible questions in more than one statement! Where’s the transparency? Why weren’t these statements released before midnight Friday? Why was the search conducted under cover of darkness? Why did Biden cooperate? What is he up to? Who planned and consented to this search? Why don’t we know yet?The DOJ official, Assistant US attorney Joseph Fitzpatrick, is a spokesman for US Attorney John Lausch, who is still leading the Biden documents probe until special counsel Robert Hur is ready to take the reins.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 22, 2023
Yeah, what’s that all about?Words with meanings? pic.twitter.com/BJla0eGV1Q
— The MinistryWasTruth✍may the alt-lie🌻⚰🌻 (@SeeleSays) January 22, 2023
VERY peculiar behavior! More transparency is definitely required! Biden is still not being forthcoming enough!I don't understand why the Biden people are voluntarily giving access to investigators instead of stonewalling and lying and screaming "WITCH HUNT" and calling the investigators Gestapo and bringing frivolous lawsuits against them.
— George Conway🌻 (@gtconway3d) January 22, 2023
Six more documents? That Biden didn’t know he had? 12 more hours of silence gives the NYT even more to Whitewater about.NEW: Special Counsel Robert Hur has not started yet & I am told FBI search of President Biden residence was overseen by US Atty John Lausch who oversaw the initial review of this matter. DOJ spox tells me,”We expect Rob Hur to be on board shortly.” https://t.co/80VjSYsHyM
— Paula Reid (@PaulaReidCNN) January 22, 2023
But…but…but…transparency!4) Trump should be indicted, because whatever Biden did or didn't do, it has nothing to do with what Trump did, which we already know. https://t.co/73NdTojvmZ
— George Conway🌻 (@gtconway3d) January 22, 2023
This cooperation is bad for Biden. And back to his Senate days? Is anybody keeping track of classified documents? Or is everything in government that isn’t in the Federal Register a classified document?This is obviously problematic for Biden, but based on what we know now, it still appears he has no criminal jeopardy based on existing case law and DOJ standards.
— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) January 22, 2023
Biden's lawyers appear to agree, given that they consented to a search instead of requiring DOJ to get a warrant. https://t.co/596CirK1kV
Legal exposure? Who cares about that? What matters is what the pundits have to “harumph” about now!Six more classified documents were just discovered at Biden’s house
— Norm Eisen (@NormEisen) January 22, 2023
Want to understand what that means for his legal exposure?@rgoodlaw @AWeissmann_ & I looked at DOJ precedent for the answer 👉https://t.co/yCdHTQQDLn
SEE???!!!???Media: @eliehonig to @PamelaBrownCNN: "By all appearances, @JoeBiden's team is trying to cooperate, but ... trying to cooperate doesn't wipe the slate clean. The more documents are found in more locations, the tougher and tougher it gets to write this off as an accident." pic.twitter.com/Ere9B2ACC3
— Porter Anderson (@Porter_Anderson) January 22, 2023
Bottle Of Scorpions
Quelle surprise:Supreme Court staffers bitter over justices getting a pass during leak investigation
— Raw Story (@RawStory) January 21, 2023
"It’s hard to imagine any of them suffering meaningful consequences even if they were implicated in the leak.”https://t.co/exsJJWMcpe
In an interview with the Times, one court staffer complained, "They weren’t subjected to the same level of scrutiny. It’s hard to imagine any of them suffering meaningful consequences even if they were implicated in the leak.”Attorney Mark Zaid agreed, saying failure to adequately press the justices, "just completely undermines the court’s credibility. It sends a message of superiority that does not exist under the eyes of the law.”
"In interviews, some employees said the leak and investigation further tainted the atmosphere inside a court that had already grown tense with disagreement. The leak spurred finger pointing, they said, with many conservatives convinced that a liberal had engineered the breach and vice versa. Just as the justices have grown more divided, so has their staff, eroding trust. Voices are more hushed now, the employees said, and doors that used to be open are closed," she wrote before adding, "In recent months, as the court has completed its report, new clerks have taken their places inside the chambers. Security is tightening. Further protocol changes are promised. And with the release of the report, a growing recognition has taken hold, some employees say: The best chance of understanding who leaked the most consequential decision in generations, and what that person was trying to achieve, is fading away."
Somebody shit in the punch bowl, but nobody's going to own it. As for the chances of "understanding who leaked the most consequential decision in generations, and what that person was trying to achieve": that was never a live option.
The Roberts Court is going to go down in Supreme Court history, alright. Way, way down.
I Do Remember This Language In The ’60’s
Hoover was still alive. That was also pre-Church Committee and exposure of COINTELPRO.Good lord these people. “American nomenklatura” lol pic.twitter.com/eKa1E5R7YL
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 21, 2023
"History" Is Such A Fluid Concept, And Other Reportorial Challenges
Like, this is the first time that the Boston Globe can remember. Or maybe the first time an incumbent President is under federal investigation. Or the first time the investigations both involve documents. Or the first time Biden is being investigated (Trump investigations are already old news. That whole January 6th thing? Pfft! Fishwrap!)I'm so old I remember the 2016 election year, with three federal investigations into two candidates (which is what THIS ONE actually is, but the BoGlo is just glossing the coup attempt, I guess). https://t.co/6BOjlpd5ez
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) January 21, 2023
Nah. The "investigation" did what it was meant to do: paper over a truly embarassing incident (somebody PLEASE cite me the criminal statute that was violated) and hoping it would go away. "Righting the institution" is not within the power of anyone on the bench, because the problem is the people on the bench. Which is to say, the problem is the institution. It ain't gonna fix itself, is it?The Supreme Court's investigation into the leak of its abortion draft opinion was meant to right the institution amid a slide in public confidence. Instead, employees say, it widened rifts and deepened suspicions, inside the court and out. https://t.co/hY9M3lWD6k
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 21, 2023
"Crossfire Hurricane" was the investigation into Trump's Russia ties in the 2016 election, which pissed Trump off so much he set John Durham loose, a spree of "special prosecution" which yielded exactly: nothing. Trump, reports are, was convinced the truth was hidden in the documents, which is why he took some with him. Maybe that's true, maybe it isn't. But the irony would be delicious.Some kind of poetic justice if Crossfire Hurricane leads to Trump’s prosecution.
— Pete Strzok (@petestrzok) January 21, 2023
“prosecutors have questioned at least three people about whether Trump’s frustrations may have been a motive in Trump taking away thousands of pages of presidential papers”https://t.co/tkpqbEMJMA