Wednesday, March 29, 2023

O Florida! Man

The new DeSantis-aligned board expressed dismay over the previous board’s actions," reported Skyler Swisher. "'This essentially makes Disney the government,' board member Ron Peri said. 'This board loses, for practical purposes, the majority of its ability to do anything beyond maintain the roads and maintain basic infrastructure.' Among other things, a 'declaration of restrictive covenants' spells out that the district is barred from using the Disney name without the corporation’s approval or 'fanciful characters such as Mickey Mouse.' That declaration is valid until '21 years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, king of England,' according to the document."

 I’m not sure how DeSantis wrests control of the Disney name from Disney, or the use of Mickey Mouse. I’m also not sure what the problem is with restricting the new district to maintaining roads and infrastructure, which is basically why the old district was created. But that’s for the courts to figure out. Sarah Rumpf points out what could be (what do I know about Fl. law?) a few more legal problems.

Let's go with the first statement first: There may be some issues with the contracts. That’s what courts are for. But the real funniest part is this: Yeah, I’m not impressed, either. But it’s better than Pushaw’s statement, which presumes Central Florida Tourism Oversight has the last word.

I kinda expect Disney has the better lawyers here.
It is pretty much like that. That, too.

No comments:

Post a Comment