They've never been "shielded from indictment." Indictments either weren’t necessary, or the President shielded themselves (George H.W.). Or were shielded by their hand-picked successor (Nixon/Ford).Things @peterbakernyt couldn't fit into his almost 2,000 word "analysis" about how indicting Trump would be unprecedented.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) March 31, 2023
1) The underlying cover-up was FOR THE PURPOSE of cheating to win. pic.twitter.com/TEcA5brhkC
Of course, this is also true:2) His Attorney General did OTHER unprecedented things to attempt to protect Trump from his crimes. That precedent may be far more ominous.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) March 31, 2023
3) Trump is also the first ex-President whose eponymous corporation was convicted (in related investigation) for business fraud.
So buckle up, buttercup. We have yet to hear from Georgia or the DOJ.The discourse rn:
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) March 31, 2023
“I haven’t read the indictment, I don’t know what the charges are, I haven’t seen the evidence, and I don’t know New York criminal law. But this much is clear: Alvin Bragg’s case against Donald Trump is a [SLAM DUNK]/[TOTAL LOSER].”
No comments:
Post a Comment