2/ Justice Barrett rounds this out with her final question:
— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) April 25, 2024
She gets USG attorney to say there's enough of these private acts to move forward, and Trump's conduct involving pressuring DOJ, Pence etc would be used just for evidentiary value not criminally liable for those acts.⬇️ pic.twitter.com/skhw7T8Fi5
4/ Thanks to @steve_vladeck's commentary here,⤵️ which helped solidify my view of the importance of Justice Barrett's exchange with Trump attorney John Sauer.https://t.co/WFj7UgaqAx
— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) April 25, 2024
Sometimes legal Twitter doesn’t make me want to gouge my eyes out.6/ My colleague @RickPildes making similar points about the path the Supreme Court can take to expeditiously resolve the case and allow the DOJ prosecution to move forward thanks in part to Trump's attorney's concessions in oral argument.⤵️https://t.co/ZBwDmrNRWN
— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) April 25, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment