It’s almost cute how he thinks “election interference” is a thing:
Trump: This is a judge that should be disbarred. This is a judge that should be out of office. This is a judge that some people say could be charged criminally for what he's doing. He’s interfering with an electionWell also, too, as well:
This is a judge who is going to decide how many millions you are going to have to pay. He just added a zero to the end of it.Ultimately, it’s all just empty blather; not even braggadocio.
Double-dog dare him to stand up in court and say that to the judge’s face.
No. TRIPLE-dog dare him. Protocol be damned.
Still, you’d pay someone to do it.
Query: is there any case law or anything that explains why rights to things like jury trial (NY, Fed) or speedy trial (GA) must be actively asserted, as opposed to being automatic? Just curious, since it was a paperwork failure on his team's part that made this a bench trial...
ReplyDelete