But probably not soon enough.What @DavidSacks and these other hype men for special treatment don't get is that the country solved the problem of uninsured deposits for small business, unless you happened to be a Silicon Valley Bank customer. They disrupted banking as well as they disrupted everything else.
— David Dayen (@ddayen) March 12, 2023
VCs *required* that all money from its startups be placed at SVB. I don't know the reason—that needs more reporting. But ICS doesn't appear to have been an option, though it seems SVB had the functionality (it either wasn't advertised much, or actively discouraged by VCs)
— David Dayen (@ddayen) March 12, 2023
Or they just assume America is so backwards that nobody else but them ever considered that $250k is a low limit for small & medium sized businesses, and they, the big-brained people, must fashion a solution. (one that already exists; this is Uber reinventing the bus)
— David Dayen (@ddayen) March 12, 2023
One other point: SVB had stable assets that have gone down slightly in value. This hair on fire frenzy is over an amount of money that VCs have and could float if they're so worried about the end of startups.
— David Dayen (@ddayen) March 12, 2023
I especially like the bit about Roku having $500 million in one bank. I know nothing about finance and I know better than that.Just incredible to me how little self-proclaimed experts know. This is Geithner's ghostwriter. The third option beyond BofA or mattresses is a private-sector solution that has been around 20 years and works perfectly fine. Any decent risk manager knows it.https://t.co/xFse2WFjJ0
— David Dayen (@ddayen) March 12, 2023
My composition teacher's the one who told me it's insane to put lots of money in one bank and she wasn't talking in hundreds of millions. It was during a financial crisis at the small college she taught at, the idiot who had done it was chosen by the trustees to take over from the incompetent old-money figure president of the college. She was livid.
ReplyDelete