“Supreme Court Bad!”

Steve Vladeck argued that Biden’s proposed court reforms are simply a response to current sentiment he characterized as: “Supreme Court bad.” Unfortunately or not, that sentiment carries more weight after this article:

2/ @CNN exclusive reporting:

"There was an immediate and clear 6-3 split."

"In their private session on the case the next day...the votes on the core issue lacked any ambiguity and Roberts was ready to write with bold strokes."https://t.co/TP1VAXzy66

— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) July 30, 2024

4/ Reagan admin lawyers ambitiously favored strong presidential powers. But Roberts distinguished himself.

From Takeover:

"[E]ven by the standards of the Reagan administration, ...Roberts regularly took more extreme positions on presidential power than many of his colleagues." pic.twitter.com/eai7S3Jg4A

— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) July 30, 2024

6/ Finally, many close observers are looking to whether the expansive view of presidential powers in Trump v. United States will apply to a president's use of the U.S. military.

Savage's book has an ominous sign for the possible answer to that: pic.twitter.com/VP1lpF5LSf

— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) July 30, 2024

Screw Article I’s provision that Congress alone can declare war, right?

 Please consult a law professor for any further information and give the professors full authority to propose and implement any Court reforms.