Another “issue” as perennial as Xmas trees and pernicious as kudzu.This is infuriatingly disingenuous. "We don't know her positions" is a straw man and Stephens knows it. I'm pretty sure I know what her administration will look like. I won't like some of it! But Harris must wade into an argument about Gaza or....
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) September 21, 2024
Or what? @SRuhle is right. /1 https://t.co/m5rIlit98r
We do know Harris’ policies, on a lot of issues. We also know Trump’s, which is frontier gibberish and bafflegab. He can’t discuss issues at all, which itself is the issue on Trump’s policies.
Stephens is peddling the age-old dodge that Harris isn’t clear on the issues because…he says so. It doesn’t mean a lot in the face of rising poll numbers, but it’s trotted out every four years anyway. Right now, it’s meaningless. Although Stephanie Ruhle could do a better job refuting it, it’s too late for it to matter anyway.
It’s actually more important that Trump won’t debate again.
We know enough to know that a so-called journalist who declares themselves undecided as of now is supporting the worst person to have ever been installed as president despite having lost every election he ran in. He's all in on what will otherwise be the Republican-fascism and the eventual civil war that will result if Trump or even the Republican-fascists in Congress regain power. Without drastic change to the Supreme Court, that's what's coming as certainly as the Taney Court hastened the first Civil War with the Dred Scott decision.
ReplyDelete