Trump's immunity win will 'backfire' on him in November: CNN analysthttps://t.co/hrvBQBrpA8
— Raw Story (@RawStory) July 1, 2024
"The more you look at it, the worse it looks," said Jones. "When you put it all together, basically, the Supreme Court said in the past week, no rules for the powerful, no rights for the powerless. So if you're homeless, you can be thrown in jail for the crime of not having enough money to get a hotel room, but if you're the President of the United States, you can commit an undetermined number of crimes under color of law and get away with it. This is not good."As I was saying:
However, Jones added, "I'm telling you, this is going to backfire politically. Because what I'm seeing from the left now, if you thought people were discouraged by what happened last week with Biden's performance, they are now outraged and terrified that Donald Trump is going to get in office and be a complete madman dictator."
"So this is — politically, this is a gift to the left, though it is a blow to the country," Jones concluded.If the debate stimulated the tongue-cluckers, this knocks them completely off their perch. It also, IMHO, galvanizes a country steeped in the idea that we don’t have a king. I knew people who thought Nixon was railroaded; but they’d never have seriously argued he was immune from all criminal prosecution.
Never take advice from fools. If Biden acts on his “new powers,” it’s quite a bit harder to argue no President, and especially Trump, should have them.If Joe Biden doesn't use this SCOTUS ruling on presidential #immunity on "official" acts to take some drastic action, then he and his entire administration and campaign are addled in truly epic ways.
— Aisha Sultan (@AishaS) July 1, 2024
I cannot compete with this https://t.co/NOzj3eWpGt
— New York Times Pitchbot (@DougJBalloon) July 1, 2024
Epic amounts.Congratulations on the stupidest take of the day.
— Angry Staffer π» (@Angry_Staffer) July 1, 2024
On a day where SCOTUS said POTUS is a King
I really think the more this sinks in…Per a friend, this tweet is circulating on some TikTok trend.
— Bradley P. Moss (@BradMossEsq) July 1, 2024
I’m personally not on the platform but I understand some of you are. pic.twitter.com/55A3vCFoBP
... the more the margins shrink…These poor little MAGAts have ABSOLUTELY no fucking idea how wrong they are.
— emptywheel (chicklet) (@emptywheel) July 1, 2024
I mean, fine for them, so long as they're willing to stay blindly loyal to Trump. https://t.co/Tw9k2TzI2l
...and shrink...Haven’t really thought the ruling through yet, huh? Drone strikes are official acts, apparently not prosecutable now. Biden could officially arrest anyone he wants based on the slightest evidence they could be working with a foreign power, and now that couldn’t be questioned.
— Mateohh (@mateohh) July 1, 2024
...and shrink.MAGAt after MAGAt keep saying that if the opinion says what the opinion says it is horrible. https://t.co/XNh9pAdnle
— emptywheel (chicklet) (@emptywheel) July 1, 2024
Now explain to her it’s not in the Constitution, it’s just in the Court’s opinion. Yes, there’s a lot of MAGA magical thinking out there that this opinion doesn’t say what it clearly says. But Trump can’t afford to lose any margin. At. All. (I should note even local TV news was accurately reporting this case in just a few sentences, emphasizing how hard a prosecution would be due to the bar on evidence.)So her claim is the president has a constitutional right to poison people?
— Justine (@BruinJustine) July 1, 2024
Which section of Article 2 does she interpret that from?
Let’s be real: the reality of this opinion is never going to reach MAGA Central. But some disgust at the margins could well be enough (not to gain Biden votes, but to lose Trump ones).Mike Johnson pretends not to understand that even if Biden's DOJ had been weaponized, John Roberts just gave sanction to that. https://t.co/i4k8b9MOog
— emptywheel (chicklet) (@emptywheel) July 1, 2024
Dumb like a sledge hammer...swung hard against the foundations of constitutional order. This is the "right hand giveth, left hand taketh away" portion of the opinion. Sure, they didn't grant absolute immunity. But you can't have any evidence to prove the crimes, so...I respectfully disagree with Barb here. I think it remains to be seen whether there is some "fruit of the poisonous tree" effect here. All of the state action, if done in furtherance of taking care that the Electoral Vote Act, or other federal election laws, are "faithfully" (π)… https://t.co/DdncwVfPvl
— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) July 1, 2024
The only solution now is a 28th Amendment.It can never again be said that in America “no man is above the law.” The Supreme Court held today that the President of the United States — and the former president in particular — is above the law, and the only person in America who is above the law.
— @judgeluttig (@judgeluttig) July 1, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment