Monday, March 31, 2025

Good For A Laugh 😆

😹😹😹😹

Then again: Gov. Jesse Ventura. But Lindell is no Ventura, he’s just a joke. 😹
Not funny; but proof Elmo is as pathetic as Trump, and just as reflexive a liar. 🤥   Now come on! That IS funny.😆  How To Piss Off A Federal Judge 101. Some of you will have to lose a lot so a few of us can get tax breaks. Your sacrifice is appreciated.—The GOP. (And we’re not really remodeling the house. We’re kicking you out so we can have more room. Please get off the lawn.)

We’re Barreling Toward Fascism And There’s Nothing We Can Do!

Wake up, sheeple! We’re done for, we’re done for!

Or, you know, not.

Like I Said: Three Cheers To Steve Doocy

💯 No notes. 👌

I think we’re done here.

Of “Tesler” And Things FUBAR

He thinks he would get Obama’s Nobel Prize, too. And points to Doocy for pointing out the utter absurdity of the premise. Seriously. 💯  "Old-fashioned”? What bubble does he live in? Although points for self-awareness. I don’t know him at all, but that’s an adjective I’d never apply to him. Implausible deniability.
Reporter: Have you had any updates on the us soldiers missing in Lithuania?

Trump: So three are no longer with us and one is unfortunately probably in the same category, but they haven't declared that yet. It was a very heavy truck, like a toy, but I mean really heavy. That lifted the heaviest equipment. And it would seem that the bank of a lake collapsed. You know, the weight is so big.
A) Why hasn’t the Pentagon released information on this?

B) “Like a toy”? Fits, actually; listening to him is like listening to a small child. Small vocabulary and very self-centered.
Is that why the stock is tanking and Wall Street expects first quarter sales numbers to be below expectations? Or is it because nobody knows what a “Tesler” is?
Reporter: Is DOGE going keep operating even without Elon Musk?

Trump: I can't tell you that. I will say this a lot of the people working with doge are the secretaries, the heads of the various agencies, and they've learned a lot. And they're dealing with the doge people. I think some of them may try to keep the doge people… At a certain point, I think it will end
The courts are working on that even as he speaks. Gonna be a lot sooner than he thinks.
Reporter: Elon Musk's special government tenure is coming to an end,.. Do you want to stay longer or is it time to going back to running his companies?

Trump: I think he's amazing but he has a big company to run. At some point he'll be going back.

Reporter: Do you want to keep him around?

Trump: I'll keep him as long as I could. He's very smart. He's done a good job. Doge, we found numbers that nobody can even believe
Twitter is certainly FUBAR. And yes, Musk is finding numbers that nobody can believe. And again, that does not mean what you think it means.

But still you keep saying it ... 😵‍💫

Possibly Civil Assault…

...but de minimus,* nonetheless.
The questionable incident unfolded on Tuesday as Charles Downs, a reporter affiliated with right-wing firebrand Laura Loomer, shoved his camera phone into Crockett’s face. The Texas Democrat can be seen in the clip shared by Loomer and others in MAGA world appearing to stretch out her hand and cover the camera as she continues walking a chatting with a Republican senator before the clip abruptly ends.
The idea that it could be criminal is laughable. Just like Martin’s claim that “no one is above the law.” Except the Administration officials in the Houthi small group Signal chat, right, Ed? I think you meant “No Democrat is above the law.” I don’t think the courts will think any are beneath it, either. If you decide to waste the court’s time….


*Fancy legal jargon for “too little to bother with.” The Latin phrase is “de minimus non curat lex,” explained to me in law school as “the law does not concern itself with trifling matters.” Criminal assault usually requires a higher standard of injury than civil assault.

Baghdad Bob Is Back In Town

And back in the House, Democrats take Darryl Issa to school:
Neguse: You believe there should be reining in of nationwide injunctions… During President Biden’s tenure, there were 14 nationwide injunctions, did you denounce any of them? Your team may need to go online and delete some of your social media posts. Are you familiar with Missouri V Biden?

Issa: I don’t recall

Neguse: This is your tweet in 2023 celebrating a district court nationwide injunction against The Biden Administration.
Well, they can make that law self-suspending when a Democrat’s in the White House, right?

Elmo Says We Need More Babies

He also says the best way to raise ‘em is to throw money at ‘em.

I guess that’s okay when billionaires do it?  🤷🏻‍♂️ 

Baked Like A Pie 🥧

Going back to the story of Forrest Fenn’s treasure, the documentary profiled 4 treasure hunters, on of whom were a father and two sons living in poverty in Wyoming. They wanted to buy their mother a decent house, and help their Downs sister. They became convinced the clues to the puzzle were in their backyard, and in fact that Fenn, an 80 year old man when he started this, had hiked up into the mountains and contrived to roll a boulder down to cover the chest.

They spent a year trying to shift that boulder, dig under it, get around it. Literally a year. Finally they blasted it loose. There was nothing under it.

They were also in contact with Fenn. When the treasure was found (in Yosemite, not where they were looking), and Fenn died shortly thereafter, they contacted the lawyer probating the estate, expecting that Fenn had left them something for all their troubles looking for his treasure.

The lawyer said a lot of people did this.

So it could be a lot of people expecting “DOGE” checks are in straitened circumstances, and imagine the rich will do something for them. 

Trump and Musk wouldn’t even take their phone calls. Fenn did; but that’s really all he did.

If the cruelty of the system isn’t the point, it sure is baked in regardless.

🙀

Fear of fascism:
Mathias adds, "I fear now that many of us here in America still haven't registered the logical endpoint of such rhetoric, which both dehumanizes subgroups of human beings and presents them as an existential threat."
MY GOD!! We’ve certainly never seen anything like that in America before!

I’ll show myself out….

The Self-Congratulation Is A Little Tiresome

Seeing a lot of self-congratulation from people abt Trump's third term INTENTIONAL DISTRACTION from all the things that can only be understood as the groundwork for permanent MAGAt rule.

What do you think the EO on elections is, if not a bid for permanent MAGAt rule?

Trump's super power is managing attention, both always retaining & it refocusing it from places where it should  be.

I remain mystified how this came up--don't rule out epic incompetence from Welker. But we're not talking the threats to democracy that are immediate, ones that can & must be fought.
The first reply to that post is: “Welker is awful.” Way to focus attention on what matters.

But it proves my point: what does “attention” matter? It’s hardly Trump’s “superpower.” He’s whining now (and not for the first time) that the Signals scandal is only the “fake news” trying to distract from the most successful 100 days in history (that’s what he’s paying attention to). Which is not exactly making it go away. If anything, it’s breaking Trump’s shield of invulnerability.

Attention is not a superpower, either. Trump may think his EO on elections is a new, MAGA VRA, but aside from a few broad federal requirements, voting even for federal elections is a state matter. Yes, I can see a few states, like Texas, which chafed under the federal oversight of the VRA, happily dancing to Trump’s tune. But the majority are going to challenge it in court; and win. The Roberts Court didn’t like the VRA. They’re going to like Trump’s effort at one-man legislation even less. (I know; Trump is going to defy court orders and the Supremes are going to set fire to the Constitution for him, and finally the Cassandras of the apocalypse will be vindicated. Feh.) And what good will my attention do? 

I’ve been writing my senators and federal representative about Social Security. Only one of them has responded, and it was a pretty empty thing. Still, if my drop is what could be a part of an ocean of public opinion, I may contribute to change. But paying attention right now? Prating on the internet, condemning Kristen Welker, writing blog posts to see who reads them? Is that really necessary? Don’t be ridiculous. My attention is neither a superpower nor a magical power, and it’s akin to Trump’s narcissism to even imagine that it is.

I just watched Netflix’s brief documentary on Forrest Fenn, the man who buried a chest full of gold and jewelry at the base of a tree in Yosemite and wrote a very bad poem leaving very obscure directions to it. After 10 years the chest was found, but the other people searching for it didn’t believe it, were convinced the “discovery” was a hoax meant to end the search (because people died in the search, looking in all the wrong places in all the worst ways. One poor man was arrested for breaking into Fenn’s house. He was trying desperately to provide for his family, and convinced the poem had led him there.). Their obsessions were carried out on the internet (of course); not because it has changed us, but because it has given us a more public forum for private gossip. It has made us think we are “paying attention.” But to what? Our own desire to be right? Our own desire to find the treasure? 

Trump is paying attention. He’s paying attention to polls, he’s paying attention to headlines, he’s paying attention to criticism. He’s not paying attention to the fires in South Carolina. He’s not paying attention to the spreading measles epidemic. He’s not paying attention to what the people he appointed are actually doing. He’s not even paying attention to how little information he’s receiving. Funnily enough, according to town halls across the country, the people actually are. And they don’t like what they’re seeing. And they aren’t just chattering with each other on social media.

Huh. Imagine that.


Attention springs and comprehensiveness and memory flow." W. Wordsworth Prelude Book 7.
O Lord, I haven’t read Willie since graduate school. That year I was a T.A., and we all had tiny offices in a suite in the English building. There was nothing better to do between classes so we hung out there all day, entertaining each other. It was the time of typewriters (computers were room sized things accessible only to Computer Science majors, and only such seniors could approach the VDT’s, as they were known). A friend and I started posting quotes from Willie typed on index cards. By “posting” I mean the physical act of attaching them to our office doors. (We could actually close the doors on our closets with students in conference. Nobody suspected improprieties would occur (you could have heard it anyway). It was a more innocent time.). Our favorite was: “O blank confusion!”

We were easily entertained. Did I mention it was a simpler time? In some ways technology has not been an improvement.

Ah…thanks for that memory.

Sunday, March 30, 2025

Down The Rabbit Hole 🕳️

I gotta say, Biden sort of seemed to be in a bubble, thinking his accomplishments (which were considerable) would speak for him and carry him a long way to re-election. But the price of eggs and inflation were what people really knew, because Biden wasn’t the Great Communicator he should have been. In short, his accomplishments didn’t blow his horn for him.

But Presidents are in a bubble. It’s inevitable. And sometimes they wholly misunderstand the consequences of their policies. When LBJ finally figured it out, he just retired. But Trump? He’s a prisoner of his own narcissism. Or is it just contagious delusion?
I mean, jiminy, these people! Don’t raise them, just reproduce! It’s quantity that matters, I guess. One of the most secure locations on earth? Sure, why not? Livestream them as they open vault so we can see the combination! Wouldn’t that be cool? Does that include you? Because the courts have repeatedly found what you are doing is illegal. “I’m very stupid and government agencies I don’t understand should be abolished. Because I’m very stupid.” "Technology is magical and will solve all of our problems,” says the man with no understanding of education at all (hint: a personal tutor for every student is not the pedagogical solution he thinks it is.). Checks and balances will be the end of western civilization! And back to the fountainhead. They didn’t mean that as a compliment. And will you say the economy is rigged?

It’s Time For Elmo…

...to learn something about civil, criminal, and even constitutional law.

To begin with, raising your middle finger to someone doesn’t even constitute civil assault. I’m pretty damned sure even if an overzealous police officer wanted to find a charge, the prosecutor would chew him out for wasting everyone’s time.

Meaning: if there is no crime (or tort), there is nothing to be done, whether these people are paid provocateurs or just mad as hell and they’re not gonna take it anymore! (And how pitiful is it that Elmo thinks everything has to be transactional. I guess the “evil” people are the ones with the money to pass around. Self-awareness is clearly not his strong suit.)

And shouting at someone doesn’t really constitute violence, either. Not in situations like this, anyway. Nor is any of this anything close to a federal matter, so go cry to Pam Bondi.
It’s transactions all the way down.

Trump Is Not FDR. This Is Not The 1940’s

 Please make it stop:

Re: Trump's third term info op. Can someone explain to me how that happened? Did Trump tape MTP and then forbid them to run it (after Putin told him not to be mad anymore)? How much included video?

Why report out interview of someone else calling you fake news?

Which brings me to the larger point.

If you're a journalist getting distracted by a hypothetical 3rd term RATHER THAN pointing to all the things happening today that presume a third term, you are being badly manipulated. Report on the urgent-now, not the hypothetical-in-3-years.
If you are a person getting distracted by a hypothetical 3rd term RATHER THAN pointing to all the things happening today that presume a unitary executive, you are being badly manipulated.

A third term is as plausible as fairies in the bottom of the garden. Already people are outraged by Trump’s antics and clear violations of law. Imagine the outrage if the GOP tries to put Trump back on the ballot, or uses Vance on the top of the ticket as a stalking horse. The Supreme Court would truly raise a crisis if they held that states could not control their ballots under either the 22nd or the 12th amendments. But the electorate would be outraged at Trump’s attempt to end run the 22nd, and likely take out their ire on the ticket and on the GOP.

And if they didn’t, they’d deserve what they get. You can’t, in the final analysis, save the people from the people. If we don’t want to follow the rule of law, we don’t want to keep the republic, either. But Trump hasn’t led us out of the Great Depression, and WWII is not forming in Europe. And Trump is certainly not FDR.  Nor is he really any good as a would be tyrant.
Trump left office when he realized his efforts to win under the 12th amendment had failed. He wasn’t dragged out of the White House by Marines, kicking and screaming. When his gang got bored and left the Capitol for Congress to get on with its business, Trump knew it was over and he followed his stolen government documents to Florida. He couldn’t even stay to see Biden inaugurated. Yes, he’s said ever since that he won, but that put him no closer to the White House, and he certainly didn’t run on that whine. He won’t leave willingly this time? Who’s going to let him stay?

Touch grass. I’m begging you.

Right After Water Starts Running Uphill

I’d almost be for it if I knew Vance would say: “I changed my mind. Fetch me a Diet Coke.”

Jimmy Carter Left A Note Saying “Good Luck With That”

(Democrats really need to run with “Morning in America” in ‘26 and ‘28.)

Wisconsin Is Not The Only Bellwether

Newsweek:
Pollster John Couvillon said in a post on X: "This was a 'primal scream' kind of vote, driven by robust Democratic EV [early voting] turnout that I'm not seeing being offset by a strong GOP Election Day vote."

“Nothin’ But Good Times Ahead!”

Trump is renowned for his ability to review and analyze vast amounts of data.

(They have no fucking idea what Trump is going to announce on Tuesday. The best they’ve got is Navarro saying: “Put your faith in Trump.” Navarro also says tariffs = tax cuts. I’m guessing he sold Trump that idea.)

JMM:
On the tariff front, this doesn’t get discussed much in the news. But the President has zero power to do tariffs. Entirely a Congress power. There is a law which allows the President to impose tariffs on an emergency basis. All of this is based on that law.

2/ Congress could remove that power tomorrow. Just saw a quote from Josh Hawley, this is all Trump. We don’t know what’s happening. This isn’t law pardons are war powers where the President has vast inherent power. This is just given him permission to do on an emergency basis.
The last President I remember promising the nation pain and suffering was Jimmy Carter.  But he was responding to the OPEC oil embargo, something he had no control over.  Trump is imposing tariffs, and the GOP Congress is letting him. Not hard to see where this ends.

May You Live In Unprecedented Times

For this he is visited daily by senators and representatives bringing distant constituents. The Executive Mansion has become that famous “Treasury trough” described so well by an early congressional orator: “Such running, such jostling, such wriggling, such clambering over one another’s backs, such squealing, because the tub is so narrow and the company is so crowded.”

To sit behind is the presidential occupation, watching and feeding the animals. If this were an amusement only, it might be pardoned; but it must be seen in a more serious light. Some nations are governed by the sword—in other words, by central force commanding obedience. Our president governs by offices—in other words, by the appointing power, being a central force by which he coerces obedience to his personal will. Let a senator or representative hesitate in the support of his autocracy, or doubt if he merits a second term, and forthwith some distant consul or postmaster, appointed by his influence, begins to tremble. Can such tyranny, where the military spirit of our president finds a congenial field, be permitted to endure?

In adopting him as a candidate for reelection, we undertake to vindicate his presidency and adopt in all things the insulting, incapable, aide-de-campish dictatorship which he has inaugurated. Presenting his name, we vouch for his fitness, not only in original nature but in experience of civil life, in aptitude for civil duties, in knowledge of republican institutions, and elevation of purpose; and we must be ready to defend openly what he has openly done. Can Republicans honestly do this thing? Let it be said that he is not only the greatest nepotist among presidents but greater than all others together, and what Republican can reply? Let it be said that he is not only the greatest gift taker among presidents but the only one who repaid his patrons at the public expense, and what Republican can reply? Let it be said that he has openly violated the Constitution and international law in the prosecution of a wretched contrivance against the peace of San Domingo, and what Republican can reply? Let it be said that wielding the power of the great republic, he has insulted the black republic with a menace of war involving indignity to the African race, and what Republican can reply? Let it be said that he has set up presidential pretensions without number, constituting an undoubted Caesarism or personal government, and what Republican can reply? And let it be added, that unconscious of all this misrule, he quarrels without cause even with political supporters, and on such a scale as to become the greatest presidential quarreler of our history, quarreling more than all other presidents together, and what Republican can reply? It will not be enough to say that he was triumphant in war—as Scipio, the victor of Hannibal, reminded the Roman people that on this day he conquered at Zama. Others have been triumphant in war and failed in civil life—as Marlborough, whose heroic victories seemed unaccountable, in the frivolity, the ignorance, and the heartlessness of his pretended statesmanship. To Washington was awarded that rarest tribute, “First in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen.” Of our president it will be said willingly, “First in war,” but the candid historian will add, “first in nepotism, first in gift taking and repaying by official patronage, first in presidential pretensions, and first in quarrel with his countrymen.”

Anxiously, earnestly, the country asks for reform and stands tiptoe to greet the coming. But how expect reform from a president who needs it so much himself? Who shall reform the reformer? So also does the country ask for purity. But is it not vain to seek this boon from one whose presidential pretensions are so demoralizing? Who shall purify the purifier? The country asks for reform in the civil service. But how expect any such change from one who will not allow the presidential office to be secured against its worst temptation? The country desires an example for the youth of the land, where intelligence shall blend with character, and both be elevated by a constant sense of duty with unselfish devotion to the public weal. But how accord this place to a president who makes his great office a plaything and perquisite, while his highest industry is in quarreling? Since Sancho Panza at Barataria, no governor has provided so well for his relations at the expense of his country; and if any other has made cabinet appointments the return for personal favors, his name has dropped out of history. A man is known by his acts; so also by the company he keeps. And is not our president known by his intimacy with those who are bywords of distrust? But all these bywords look to another term for perpetuation of their power. Therefore, for the sake of reform and purity, which are a longing of the people, and also that the chief magistrate may be an example, we must seek a remedy.

See for one moment how pernicious must be the presidential example. First in place, his personal influence is far reaching beyond that of any other citizen. What he does others will do. What he fails to do, others will fail to do. His standard of conduct will be accepted at least by his political supporters. His measure of industry and his sense of duty will be the pattern for the country. If he appoints relations to office and repays gifts by official patronage, making his presidency a great “gift enterprise,” may not every officeholder do likewise, each in his sphere, so that nepotism and gift taking with official remuneration will be general, and gift enterprises be multiplied indefinitely in the public service? If he treats his trust as plaything and perquisite, why may not every officeholder do the same? If he disregards Constitution and law in the pursuit of personal objects, how can we expect a just subordination from others? If he sets up pretensions without number repugnant to republican institutions, must not the good cause suffer? If he is stubborn, obstinate, and perverse, are not stubbornness, obstinacy, and perversity commended for imitation? If he insults and wrongs associates in official trust, who is safe from the malignant influence having its propulsion from the Executive Mansion? Necessarily the public service takes its character from its elected chief, and the whole country reflects the president. His example is a law. But a bad example must be corrected as a bad law.

To the Republican Party, devoted to ideas and principles, I turn now with more than ordinary solicitude. Not willingly can I see it sacrificed. Not without earnest effort against the betrayal can I suffer its ideas and principles to be lost in the personal pretensions of one man. Both the old parties are in a crisis, with this difference between the two: the Democracy is dissolving, the Republican Party is being absorbed; the Democracy is falling apart, thus visibly losing its vital unity; the Republican Party is submitting to a personal influence, thus visibly losing its vital character. The Democracy is ceasing to exist, the Republican Party is losing its identity. Let the process be completed, and it will be no longer that Republican Party which I helped to found and have always served, but only a personal party, while instead of those ideas and principles which we have been so proud to uphold will be presidential pretensions, and instead of Republicanism there will be nothing but Grantism.

Political parties are losing their sway. Higher than party are country and the duty to save it from Caesar. The caucus is at last understood as a political engine moved by wire pullers, and it becomes more insupportable in proportion as directed to personal ends.

Much rather would I see the party to which I am dedicated under the image of a lifeboat not to be sunk by wind or wave. How often have I said this to cheer my comrades! I do not fear the Democratic Party. Nothing from them can harm our lifeboat. But I do fear a quarrelsome pilot, unused to the sea but pretentious in command, who occupies himself in loading aboard his own unserviceable relations and personal patrons, while he drives away the experienced seamen who know the craft and her voyage. Here is a peril which no lifeboat can stand.
Sen. Charles Sumner, 1872

The More Things Change…

 George Wallace, 1963:

In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.
Emptywheel:
Will return to this thought.

But the notion that USG chooses not to do business w/law firms or foreign companies that choose to seek diverse hires says that the SINGLE GREATEST SELECTION criteria is not, are you best suited to do the job (merit), but do you support segregatation.
...the more they stay the same.

🤨

 The convictions of Elon Musk’s grandfather:

“An ‘Invisible Government,’ working to carry out the objectives of the International Conspiracy, is operating in every country,” he wrote in his book The International Conspiracy in Health, which was published in the mid-1960s. In it, he also said the conspiracy was pushing for the fluoridation of water supplies, mandatory milk pasteurization and mass vaccination programs.
Oh, it doesn't end there, does it?
Haldeman thought government was being badly mismanaged and at one point in his career, he embraced the solution proposed by a movement called Technocracy: that government should be run by scientists and engineers, not politicians.

Over his lifetime, Haldeman would lead two Canadian political parties (one of which he founded), campaign against Canadian prime ministers William Lyon Mackenzie King and John Diefenbaker, write a book defending South Africa’s system of apartheid and spend years flying and driving across the African wilderness with his family — hunting for the Lost City of the Kalahari.
I have to add one more thing:
Kevin Anderson, a historian at the University of Calgary who has studied the conspiratorial thinking that emerged during the 1930s and '40s, told CBC there are stunning echoes between that time and today.

He said if he were to read a list of Haldeman’s beliefs in one of his classes today and ask, “When do you think this was written? I bet the more aware students would say, ‘Oh, two years ago — this year.’”
The more things change…. Interesting.

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Saturday Night Special

As long as it doesn’t raise the price of eggs? (He thinks tariffs will only raise prices on foreign goods. He’s stuck in the 1970’s. Like a dementia patient.)
BREAKING: Trump tells NBC that he is committed to annexing Greenland and that a military option is not off the table.

“We’ll get Greenland. Yeah, 100%,” Trump said.

He added that there’s a “good possibility that we could do it without military force” but that “I don’t take anything off the table.”
NATO has entered the chat. Although, at the end of his term he’ll insist he did annex Greenland, but he was cheated out of it. 77 million votes for POTUS suspends the Constitution and makes the winner the diktator.  All Jordan is arguing against is that damned rule of law! Without it we could be a proper government of men, not of laws. Well, as long as the POTUS is a Republican. See? It’s so much more constitutional when you let Republicans do whatever they want to. Ignorance is not only bliss, it’s just so much easier! Although that version leaves out the self-praise, which is always the most important part of a Trump rant. That’s better. Rules for thee, but not for me!

At Least We Fixed The Price Of Eggs?

Pretty sure this is not what we voted for…

🚀💥

Launching nuclear fuel into the atmosphere on a SpaceX rocket.🚀 
… Reuters reported that Russia is offering to give a nuclear power plant to Musk for his mission to colonize Mars. Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund: "Russia can offer a small-sized nuclear power plant for a mission to Mars and other advanced technological capabilities.” He said Musk was a “great visionary” and he expects to meet with him soon to go over the details.
What could go wrong? 💥

Is Chip Afraid Of Democrats?

Or what? 😹

THE PROBLEM WAS SIGNAL!!

 Nothing to see here:

To recap, in private, unofficial group chat that was not cleared for classified info:

☑️Trump's National Security Advisor disclosed TOP SECRET/HCS info from an Israeli source.

☑️Trump's Secretary of Defense disclosed SECRET war plans (which are only SECRET instead of TS bc DOD needs them on SIPR).
But fire Waltz and we’re all good, right?

The Year Of Magical Thinking

 A/k/a “magic”:

Attorney Arthur Aidala defended federal employee firings under Donald Trump's administration during a CNN appearance on Saturday morning, but angered his fellow panelists after he was confronted with America's veterans also seeing their jobs taken away which he blew off.

Seated next to CNN conservative S.E. Cupp, the attorney attempted to make the case that the Elon Musk-headed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was doing Americans a favor by getting rid of thousands of jobs and replacing them with AI and computers that he claimed will be more efficient.
First, what does this guy know about computers or AI?
Because he’s talking like they are magical devices that do what…somebody wants, and never more than that. Might I recommend a course of study in the literature of “deals with the devil,” where the devil is always in the details and the deal is never what you think it is. Because you only think of the outcome you want, and never take into account consequences or how what you said is not exactly what you meant.

And computers, like the devil in the stories, are remarkably literal.

The old computer programming acronym for this is GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out. You can’t always tell what garbage went in, so you have to check for garbage coming out. AI can simulate understanding (at least to some people), but AI cannot understand. Nor can it answer the phone and deal with people who do not speak clearly enough for it. Like, you know, old people trying to get information. Or just human beings in general. I’ve had enough experience with computers screening calls in order to save money on human beings answering phones. It never ends without waiting for the damned computer to finally transfer me to an actual person.

The concomitant magical thinking is that if we make it harder to rely on government services, people will quit relying on government services. It’s the same magical thinking that angry people at town halls are all Democrats (we discard them). And then we can finally convince people that government is bad!

As long as we get it done before 2026!  Maybe we can deport all the Democrats by then… 🤔

Greenland 🇬🇱 Follies

A picture of all the natives of Greenland who greeted the VPOTUS. I haven’t checked, but I think Jr. stayed longer. I know Jr. met with more native Greenlanders.

Another Form Of Hegemony

Mais non!
The Trump administration has ordered some French companies with U.S. government contracts to comply with his executive order banning diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes, highlighting the extraterritorial reach of U.S. policies and their potential impact on European corporate practices.

The companies have been told to confirm their compliance in a questionnaire entitled "Certification Regarding Compliance With Applicable Federal Anti-Discrimination Law." Reuters has seen a copy of the questionnaire.
The questionnaire was sent out by the U.S. Embassy in Paris. One problem though:
There was no indication that the companies receiving the letter were selected based on their presence in the United States. A source close to the matter confirmed that France's state-controlled telecoms group Orange (ORAN.PA), which has no U.S. presence, received the letter.

Meanwhile, defence electronics firm Thales (TCFP.PA), and oil major TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA), both with operations in the U.S., did not receive it, according to spokespeople for the companies. Orange declined to comment.
The incompetence starts at the top; and it does trickle down. And what’s the French version of: “Fuck off!”?
An official close to French Finance Minister Eric Lombard said the matter would be taken up with the U.S. government.

"This practice reflects the values of the new U.S. government. They are not the same as ours. The minister will remind his counterparts in the U.S. government of this," the official said.
I want to point out there’s an assumption this directive was meant for French companies with contracts with the U.S. government. There’s no indication of that, however. I mean, the assumption is sound, under normal circumstances. These aren’t those.

Responsibility Bites

The same people who don’t want to hold Town Hall meetings?

This is a really important point. Trump is losing most of the cases he's losing because no statute directly authorizes what he's doing.

Instead of complaining about judges doing their jobs, congressional Republicans could, you know, *pass legislation* to give Trump the authorities he's claiming.
Responsibility is a bitch!

Nest Of Spiders 🕷️

 Note to pundits who still think Trump “revels” in chaos and being unpredictable (which at least sounds like a “strategy”):

Just days out from Trump’s April 2 announcement of global tariffs, which he has hailed as “Liberation Day,” even those closest to the president — from Vice President JD Vance to his chief of staff Susie Wiles and his own Cabinet officials — have privately indicated that they’re unsure exactly what the boss will do, according to three people who have spoken with them.

While some details of the administration’s plan for what Trump has dubbed “reciprocal tariffs” on global trading partners are starting to trickle out, the president has at times upended them or floated contradictory policies that are keeping everyone — even his inner circle — guessing.

“No one knows what the fuck is going on,” said one White House ally close to Trump’s inner circle, granted anonymity to speak freely. “What are they going to tariff? Who are they gonna tariff and at what rates? Like, the very basic questions haven’t been answered yet.”

Indeed, while the White House is projecting confidence publicly, multiple administration officials, as well as top allies on the outside, are privately concerned that next week’s roll-out could be as rocky as when he imposed tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China on March 4, worsening a rout on stocks that began in mid-February. Though the S&P 500 has since regained some ground, all of its previous gains since Election Day have been erased.
The man’s mind is just a nest of spiders. There’s nothing more to it than that. 
Part of the uncertainty stems from the president seeming to undermine his own team at times. After Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett said in recent weeks that only about 10 or 15 countries — or the “dirty 15,” as Bessent put it — would face reciprocal tariffs, Trump said Wednesday that actually every country will be hit with a tariff.

The president similarly undercut Lutnick earlier this month, after the Commerce secretary suggested Canada and Mexico might avoid the full 25 percent Trump had threatened over border security and fentanyl — though two people close to the president said Lutnick was freelancing and has since been told to stay on message. Trump went ahead and slapped that duty on the two North American neighbors on March 4, but then paused much of it a day later and exempted certain goods — a rollercoaster of announcements that left many businesses and investors unsure about how the new tariffs would work.
This ain’t chess. It ain’t checkers. He’s not eating the pieces. He’s not even sitting at the board. At best, he’s wandering in and out of contact with reality.
Indeed, Trump has continued to shift the scope, targets and timeline of his tariffs at a whiplash-inducing pace. The duties he promised, pre-inauguration, to levy on Canada and Mexico his first day in office shifted to Feb. 1, then Feb. 4, then March 4, before being largely rolled back until April 2. There is little clarity about what parts of those tariffs — which could hit more than $1 trillion worth of trade — will go into effect next week.

The size of the so-called reciprocal tariffs, which the administration says it’s calculating for individual trading partners based on their treatment of U.S. imports, could also shift. Administration officials have indicated to foreign diplomats that those duties are meant to be a starting point for negotiations with other countries, meaning American companies may not know what if any tariffs will stick.

Trump also threatened to impose tariffs April 2 on various critical industries, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, copper and lumber, before indicating in recent days that those tariffs are likely to be delayed.
Go on. Tell me I’m wrong. Go back to the start of the article. Nobody knows what’s going to come out of Trump’s mouth on Tuesday. Not even Trump. At least with George III, people realized he was mad.



Trump II brings on Great Depression II by the 4th of July. Maybe by memorial day. This is what happens when billionaires are allowed to buy the government.
I’m beginning to be suspicious of the “price of eggs” explanation for the electoral outcome. I think the majority really thought “it doesn’t matter,” but electing a black woman, does. Just can’t go there. There is no system of government that will protect us from ourselves.

That Explains The 🦗🦗

"That was in a foreign country, and besides…”
Before USAID was gutted, transport contracts sent U.S. search-and-rescue crews abroad within 24 hours for major disasters like Myanmar's earthquake.

The once-effective system lies in ruins as DOGE cut disaster crews, dog search teams, and heavy equipment needed for rescue operations.
But DOGE claims to have saved trillions of dollars, so there’s that….

Friday, March 28, 2025

🎩 Third Time’s The Charm?

Pretty sure this is the third time for all of them. Does posting it on Twitter make it more official? Age. It’s happening to me. And I am fit for one thing: retirement. I’m also several years younger than Trump. “Man got to know his limitations.” Pitiful. Especially when the lies are so transparent. Depends: are we still doing supply side economics? I mean, we’re still (apparently!) doing Milton Friedman University of Chicago economics, which is SO 1980’s, so I’m not sure.🤔  My representative, I’m ashamed to say. The Lege gerrymandered the district just for him. I seriously doubt even his district wants to see us commandeer Greenland. Such are the times we live in. We have to humor the madman, so he won’t be…mad.

Or maybe we’re all mad here. Hard to tell anymore.

Off topic and displaced in time, but I needed somewhere to put this.

Goodnight, Gracie.

“The President’s Desires”?

We can’t? We can’t ignore the President’s desires? The President of Russia? Or the President of the United States of America?

I’m pretty sure Congress can very much ignore the President’s desires. Since any forced annexation of Greenland would require Congressional authorization. Any joining of Greenland, any making Greenland a protectorate of the United States, would require the approval of Congress.

Not to mention the agreement of Denmark, and of NATO. Which is why Putin agrees with Vance:
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday warned that President Trump’s frequent rhetoric promoting a U.S. takeover of Greenland is not “just some eccentric talk of the new American administration.”
As others are noticing: The comparison to Putin is especially damning. Accurate; and therefor damning.

Get This Man A Camera! 📸

Excellent suggestion, Sen. Foghorn Leghorn! “Boo-hoo! I’ve driven another company into the ground and somebody is being mean to me about it!” 😢 Oh, let’s get the full picture on that one.
"The birth rate is very low almost in every country," he said. "Unless that changes, civilization will disappear."
"Civilization"? I thought humanity was at risk.  I think I know what he’s afraid of; pretty much the same thing the Nazis were on about. Well, that confirms it. And the end of civilization, to boot! O, the humanities!

Definitely need to get Elmo doing more interviews!

Elmo Is A Businessman! Elmo Is A Genius! You Can Trust Whatever He Says About Doge!

Answering the question:  the same reason we elected a convicted felon and business fraud to sit behind the Resolute Desk and be told nothing by his staff and appointees.

🤨

In Britain, Even Larry the Cat Cares

In America?  We want to take over Greenland and squash DEI in New Jersey. And Trump brags about himself:
Myanmar?  Thailand? 🦗🦗🦗

Our leaders are an international embarassment.  So are we.  All over the price of eggs.  We should be ashamed.

Just Another Day In…

So it was a payoff. And yeah, campaign contributions will usually send you straight to jail, do not pass “Go,” do not collect $200,00. 🤦‍♂️  What was going on 82 years ago? 🤔  War is peace. Ignorance is strength. And Greenland is a NATO member. Are we really going to war with NATO over Greenland, which 3/4s of America doesn’t want?

This is what we get for the price of eggs?
Yeah, that’s not how that works. That’s not how that has ever worked.  You people really misread Trump v U.S.  Does she understand that DEI is not illegal nor banned by law? Nor has it been ruled “racism against white men.” Well, I know I feel better. Especially now.

I Saw A Tweet A Few Weeks Back…

...replying to another tweet, urging the author to “tag” the original tweet to the Chief Justice. Because to people on Twitter, that’s how the world works. Tag the Chief Justice of the United States, and he’ll straighten things out.

🤦 

Trump does the same thing. He sends out social media messages with no real content, and adds the very Presidential line: “Thank you for your attention to this matter.” As if, among other things, my attention has magical governing powers.

I see it all the time, where I’m urged to pay attention to the next burning issue, and think the right thoughts about it, as if government were Tinkerbelle and only my applause would save it from extinction. Paying attention to Trump’s empty pronouncements somehow validates him? Or is it that somewhere in his lizard brain the new Canadian PM’s announcement made Trump realize he might have gone too far? And now he has to backpedal and seem reasonable, to claim this is all part of  “the art of the deal”?

I’m just going to go back to not thinking my attention has magical powers.

Of MAGAts And Men (and Women)

 No, I’m not going to kick her in the teeth rhetorically:

"We had the flag, I had the shirt – I was a MAGA junkie," Piggott told CNN.

Piggott's job was eliminated when DOGE gutted the bureau where she was classified as a probationary civil service worker.

"I cried," she said, tearing up again. "It’s scary, you know, it’s a really scary thing, and I was embarrassed."

DOGE cut Piggott and her colleagues over alleged poor performance, but she told CNN that she'd received "the highest rating" possible on a job review three weeks before she was fired, and she now regrets voting for Trump a third time.

“I’m not sure that I would have [voted for Trump], and the way that it’s been done," she said. "I’m for balancing the budget, that type of thing, but not, not in this context, it’s just not right."

A federal appeals court judge has refused to pause a ruling that requires the administration to reinstate more than 17,000 workers who lost their jobs across six agencies, but that's little consolation to Piggott, who said she has been targeted with vandalism and death threats since speaking out about the cuts.

"I expected better from [Trump], I really did," she said. "I expected that you would do what was right and cut waste and fraud and all of those things that you promised us before we elected you in office, but you're not doing that. You're creating a disaster, and I don't know what America is going to look like if this continues."
I don’t even blame her for believing a balanced budget is the be-all and end-all of governance. Clinton “balanced the budget.” I defy you to explain what that means, or even what good it did. Certainly nobody noticed.

Government should run “like a business.” Trump’s businesses, per the NY state court, were all operated on a fraudulent basis. Truth Social is only slightly worse off than Twitter since Elmo took over. Tesla is failing because it’s not only not the next big thing, it’s run by a Nazi (not a real inducement for sales). And their cars are held together with glue.

Yeah.

I worked on a case once where I came to understand the nature of business debt. Car dealers work from up what is called a “floor loan.” Essentially the lender buys the cars from the manufacturer, and as the dealer sells cars,  the loan is repaid. Never fully paid, of course, because as cars leave the lot, new ones arrive. The debt is constant, but it’s always being used to provide cars to sell.

Businesses can go bankrupt, but governments can’t. Oh, they can make a hash of their national economy, but there is no bankruptcy court they can retreat to. A car dealer has a “balanced budget” so long as income doesn’t endanger debt service. A big car dealer in the Houston area disappeared in a few days because the bank canceled his floor loan and he couldn’t buy more cars to sell. It wasn’t a long, slow fall, just advertising heavily one day, then off the air and the parking lot empty the next.

Twitter and Tesla keep going mostly because investors keep pumping money into them by trading the stocks. That and they have enough capital to keep stumbling on. Businesses can also be run by one person (a lot of investors are complaining that Elmo needs to come back to Tesla). Governments, especially democratic republics, don’t work that way.

One reason why not is what happened to Ms. Pigott.

There’s certainly a “be careful what you ask for, you might get it” story here. But the better question is: why is this what she asked for? For 60 years the Republican Party has been preaching the gospel of a balanced budget. They got it with Clinton, but that only proved they didn’t mean it. 

This, now, is what they meant. Just like Trump meant to follow Project 2025, even as he denied it. And now the country’s going to get what Republicans wanted, and they’re going to get it good and hard. The silver lining is, so far, they don’t seem to like it very much. Connect it to the balanced budget shibboleth, and you might see a real sea change in American politics.

We live in hope.

He Even Whines Like Trump

Pretty sure that would be the courts declaring those cuts unconstitutional. The DOJ is not your law firm, either. If they even try to bring such a claim, it’ll be tossed for lack of standing instanter.  Or is Trump going to sign an EO ordering Bondi to investigate them? Maybe for wearing tattoos and causing “a ruckus”? You can’t deport citizens (at least not the white, non-tattooed ones), so they’re gonna get due process, and you’re back to square one: no federal interest in the problems of a car company led by a Nazi.

Clearly George Soros Is Printing Up All These Signs

 


Thursday, March 27, 2025

Start With The Guy In The Mirror

The majority of this country would happily give him up. Ummmm... “Trump’s agenda” is not in the Constitution. Not anywhere in it. So we’ve found another area in which she has no expertise; or knowledge whatsoever. Start with the guy in the mirror. No, seriously; I’m speaking as a pastor now. There’s a reason government does things business does not. Would that be the company that ran you off before you drove it into the ground? Like you’ve done to Twitter and Tesla? You and Trump have so much in common; and neither of you should be anywhere near government, except for filing a tax return. Like the 500,000 Cybertrucks a year you said you’d be selling by now? When you can’t sell 40,000 a year, and had to recall all 46,000 you’ve sold? How about the “wall of receipts” you had to pull down? Or your complete inability to understand how Social Security’s databases work? Or how you just announce “waste, fraud, and abuse” without ever providing evidence of it? It is contrary to law to not be able to provide any proof of waste or fraud. You know, like the inspectors general used to do? People who were actually good at their jobs, rather than just being a con man. Pretty much the only think Elmo is good at.