Mark Warner asks Kash if he has opened an investigation into the Signal list.
He says he was just briefed last night.
🤪
Warner asks for an answer by EOD.
It’s a long way to Nevada.
Heinrich: Who determined information on Signal was not classified.
Or was there declassification after the fact.
Ratcliffe: Uh.
Now he's back to filibustering again.
"Humina-humina-humina”
In response to Mark Kelly, Tulsi and Ratcliffe claim not to know abt DOD policy on Controlled unclassified information on Signal.
Nothing to see here.
LOLOL. Tulsi says she can't say whether she would approve the discussion for public release, bc of the private nature of the Signal chat to which a journalist was added. 😂
A chat she says she wasn’t on.
"Did you contact the defense secretary or others after this specific military planning was put out and say, hey, we should be doing this in a SCIF?" Warner asked Gabbard.
"There was no classified material that was shared in that Signal," the DNI said.
"So then if there was no classified material, share it with the committee," Warner told a silent Gabbard. "You can't have it both ways."
"Senator, I'll reiterate that there was no classified material that was shared in that," Gabbard again repeated.
"Ma'am, if there's no classified materials, share," Warner advised. "And then if there's no classified materials, then answer — you can't even answer the question whether you were on the chat."
See?Ut oh. Tulsi was overseas during the Signal chat too.
👀
She refuses to answer whether she was using her own phone or not.
Or was she?
LOLOL.
Reed asks Ratcliffe if Goldberg could release the thread.
Ratcliffe dodges.
Reed asks Kash.
Kash says he won't prejudge legal question.
Was there even a discussion?
Ossoff asks Timothy Haugh (NSA) if he would be interested in timing of airstrikes.
He says it's their job. "From our perspective any advance warning is certainly something we're trying to get."
Ratcliffe still refuses to admit this was a huge mistake.
Why would operational information be classified? I mean, why not let Jeff Goldberg in on it? Or anyone else, for that matter?
After he do-not-recalling the content of the Signal thread, Ossoff gets Ratcliffe to admit to intelligence interest of thread.
But still, you know, no big deal. 🤷🏻♂️
EXCLUSIVE from @garretthaake.bsky.social — Trump stands by Mike Waltz, saying he has "learned a lesson" and is a "good man" despite the Signal mishap.
Adds that having a journalist on the private chat had "no impact" on the strikes in Yemen
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-stands-national-security-adviser-leaked-military-plans-saying-mi-rcna197944
See? What? You were expecting accountability? 😹😹😹
Resignations.
In any normal world Walz, Gabbard, Ratcliffe, Hegseth at minimum should be offering their immediate resignations. They've been in public office less than two months and already have violated their oaths, endangered national security, potentially criminally.
Well,
there’s your problem right there. We left “normal” so far behind two months ago you can’t even see it in the rear view mirror.
No comments:
Post a Comment