5-D Chess, baby! pic.twitter.com/6ktzbdFX13
— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) March 25, 2025
All of those people discussing classified information on Signal, and the White House wants a fall guy:Hannity describes The Atlantic story as a smear that nobody will care about pic.twitter.com/seUGXaq7L3
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 25, 2025
A senior Trump administration official told the outlet that there are threads between staffers on how to handle Waltz. Dasha Burns, White House bureau chief at Politico, told CNN's Kaitlan Collins on "The Source" they're looking for "who's going to pay" — with some saying he ought to resign to "spare Trump."Because that’s the problem.
“Half of them saying he’s never going to survive or shouldn’t survive,” the official told the outlet.
“It was reckless not to check who was on the thread. It was reckless to be having that conversation on Signal. You can’t have recklessness as the national security adviser,” the official added.
A person close to the White House told the outlet: “Everyone in the White House can agree on one thing: Mike Waltz is a f---ing idiot.”
Suozzi: This is a major screw up.. what are the Chinese saying right now? What are European allies saying? How do they feel about sharing intelligence data with us when people are acting in this cavalier way on very sensitive topics? pic.twitter.com/gzkuRrzHct
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 25, 2025
Waltz is the scapegoat, not the problem.Buttigieg: What if this had, in fact, gone to somebody else? I mean, somebody who could plausibly be in some of these people's cell phones. I don't know, the Chinese ambassador or Russian negotiator.
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 25, 2025
And the other question on my mind is how many other times has something like… pic.twitter.com/ZbJulWLqG2
I believe we can apply Occam's Razor here and draw the appropriate conclusion: Secretary Pete was drunk.
ReplyDelete