Thursday, March 24, 2022

"Let Them Fight"

Also, too, as well: Now back to our thesis: First: Schumer and that activity? Seriously?   Schumer?  Chuck Schumer?  He couldn't strike a spark in a match factory.

Second: stop them? 

a) how? Ball gags? Removal instanter from the hearing room? Tar and feathers for those who don't go of their own volition? 

b) given nobody except Twitter obsessives is even paying attention, who cares? 

c) why would you want to stop someone who is hitting themselves in the face? This is the GOP Presidential bench. Let them fight. Hell, it's entertainment (again, for those of us actually paying attention) that they think this is a winning issue.
Except when you're down to trying to get a Supreme Court Nominee to define "woman" in a way that won't offend the delicate shell-likes of the "good Americans" in Peoria.  Then it's just sad; for them, I mean.

1 comment:

  1. The idea of ball-gags in the mouths of Hawley, Cruz, Blackburn and Graham . . . what you trying to do? Encourage me to take up sadism in my old age?

    I'd quote Merriam Websters if asked to define a word. Reading him and his biography made me pretty pro-Webster without actually wanting to retain his reformed spelling.

    ReplyDelete