Tuesday, May 28, 2024

The Stool Absolute

I’m old enough to remember Trump mocking Obama for using a teleprompter. TRUMP VERY ANGRY AT WHAT TRUMP NO CAN HAVE! 🀐😢🀫 (So why is he still talking?)
This is what Trump was trying to say:
"Former FEC commissioner Bradley Smith’s testimony would have established that Trump cannot have willfully violated FECA [The Federal Election Campaign Act]. Because NDAs are not campaign expenditures, Trump did not have a FECA legal duty with respect to them…Ergo, he could not have intentionally flouted a known legal duty.”
And Turley, who reslly is vying for the Alan Dershowitz Biggest Embarrassment To His Legal Faculty Crown:
“A classic closing pitch by lawyers is to use a physical object like a three-legged stool. If any leg is missing, the stool collapses. Even a cursory review of the evidence shows this case does not have a leg to stand on…The case against Trump should end in ‘NOT GUILTY.’”
I am convinced Trump doesn’t understood a word said in court that isn’t his name.

No comments:

Post a Comment