Sunday, October 09, 2022

Why Does Anyone Represent Donald Trump?

This is going to make an interesting position in court. And the DOJ is bound to use it. Not THAT incompetent, I don't think. Chris Kise is beginning to wonder about his plans to spend the rest of that retainer, for example.  Because it's tempting to think his conviction on whatever the DOJ decides to charge him with over these documents is a foregone conclusion. It's not just his legal case, it's that the man continually displays a pig-headed ignorance: That's not even the allegation, because, from what I understand, information on how to build a nuclear bomb is widely available on the internet. What Trump is reportedly guilty of is keeping information on the American nuclear arsenal and strategies, which is a much more dangerous set of data to be running loose in the world.
"I'm not trying to be overly dramatic," Figliuzzi explained. "Even a discussion of the nature of special access programs becomes problematic. That's how sensitive they are. It's project-oriented. It could be long-term research that the government's doing on some incredibly sensitive technology. It could be the next iteration of a nuclear program or submarine. It could be a new weapons plan that's being worked on. It could be a new effort to insert people into a certain terrorist organization. We just don't know. But we know it's time sensitive. It's the most limited access you can get, and you get briefed in and out."
Once again Trump reduces it to what he understands, and misunderstands all over again. Tell me again why this guy should even be allowed in a White House for a public tour? 

And if it isn't his legal case, it's "erase your memories so we can fill them for you:" I also don't think Ms. Haberman is saving anything for a second book: We interrupt this tirade to point out that Rolling Stone called Tuberville a racist. Was it really that hard for everybody else? Then again, the NYT can't call "Ye" (his name now) an anti-Semite (i.e., racist) because: journalistic standards, or something. And wrapping up the week: maybe Twitter is already irrecoverably damaged. I'm trying to imagine how it gets worse from here. I guess it was fun while it lasted.

No comments:

Post a Comment