...because, despite being POTUS, the legal advice your getting (or ignoring) sucks. Yeah, that could be it.Our highly trained security professionals are not allowed to do their job on the Border because of the Judicial Activism and Interference by the 9th Circuit. Nevertheless, they are working hard to make America a safer place, though hard to do when anybody filing a lawsuit wins!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2018
"I would like to say 'This book is written to the glory of God', but nowadays this would be the trick of a cheat, i.e., it would not be correctly understood."--Ludwig Wittgenstein
"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards."--Soren Kierkegaard
Thursday, November 22, 2018
Or
Thanksgiving 2018
"We're all forgiven at Thanksgiving, and everybody's welcome at the feast."--Garrison Keillor
PRAISE AND HARVEST
Almighty God, our Heavenly Father, from whom cometh every good and pefect gift, we call to remembrance thy loving-kindness and the tender mercies which have been ever of old, and with grateful hearts we would lift up to thee the voice of our thanksgiving,
For all the gifts which thou hast bestowed upon us; for the life thou hast given us, and the world in which we live,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For the work we are enabled to do, and the truth we are permitted to learn; for whatever of good there has been in our past lives, and for all the hopes and aspirations which lead us on toward better things,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For the order and constancy of nature; for the beauty and bounty of the world; for day and night, summer and winter, seed-time and harvest; for the varied gifts of loveliness and use which every season brings,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For all the comforts and gladness of life; for our homes and all our home-blessings; for our friends and all pure pleasure; for the love, sympathy, and good will of men,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For all the blessings of civilization, wise government and legislation; for education, and all the privileges we enjoy through literature, science, and art; for the help and counsel of those who are wiser and better than ourselves,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For all true knowledge of thee and the world in which we live, and the life of truth and righteousness and divine communion to which thou hast called us; for prophets and apostles, and all earnest seekers after truth; for all lovers and helpers of mankind, and all godly and gifted men and women,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For the gift of thy Son Jesus Christ, and all the helps and hopes which are ours as his disciples; for the presence and inspiration of thy Holy Spirit, for all the ministries of thy truth and grace,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For communion with thee, the Father of our spirits; for the light and peace that are gained through trust and obedience, and the darkness and disquietude which befall us when we disobey thy laws and follow our lower desires and selfish passions,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For the desire and power to help others; for every opportunity of serving our generation according to thy will, and manifesting the grace of Christ to men,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For all the discipline of life; for the tasks and trials by which we are trained to patience, self-knowledge and self-conquest, and brought into closer sympathy with our suffering brethren; for troubles which have lifted us nearer to thee and drawn us into deeper fellowship with Jesus Christ,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For the sacred and tender ties which bind us to the unseen world; for the faith which dispels the shadows of earth, and fills the saddest and the last moments of life with the light of an immortal hope.
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
God of all grace and love, we have praised thee with our lips; grant that we may praise thee also in consecrated and faithful lives. And may the words of our mouth and the meditations of our heart be acceptable in thy sight, O Lord, our Strength and our Redeemer.
AMEN.
THANKSGIVING
Almighty God, our Heavenly Father, from whom cometh every good and perfect gift, we call to remembrance they loving-kindness and they tender mercies which have ever been od old, and with grateful hearts we would lift up to the the voice of our thanksgiving.
For all the gifts which thou has bestowed upon us; for the life that thou hast given us, and the world in which we life,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For the work we are enabled to do, and the truth we are permitted to learn; for whatever of good there has been in our past lives, and for all the hopes and aspirations which lead us on to better things,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For the order and constancy of nature; for the beauty and bounty of the world; for day and night, summer and winter, seed-time and harvest; for the varied gifts of loveliness and use which every season brings,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
For all the comforts and gladness of life; for our homes and all our home-blessings; for our friends and all pure pleasure; for the love, sympathy, and good will of men,
WE PRAISE THEE, O GOD.
Wednesday, November 21, 2018
I Said I Wouldn't Do This
Look at that map and be afraid (I know it's summer in Antarctica, but still!). Be doubly afraid because our President is so stupid.I know you're Mr. America-is-all-that-matters, but climate is actually a global phenomenon. Here's today's global weather map (oh, and red=hot.) As a whole, Earth is about 1.2 degrees above preindustrial temps today pic.twitter.com/kRaGd7cZF3— Bill McKibben (@billmckibben) November 22, 2018
He makes the tides go in and out, too
You just can’t win with the Fake News Media. A big story today is that because I have pushed so hard and gotten Gasoline Prices so low, more people are driving and I have caused traffic jams throughout our Great Nation. Sorry everyone!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2018
Hooray for traffic jams! Under Trump, they're the best! (?)
The best response is in his Twitter feed:
Price of a barrel of oil was $53 in Jan 2017. You, Russia & Saudis drove it up to $82. Now you want credit for it coming down? But thanks for inventing Thanksgiving & traffic jams on the 3rd Wed in Nov. I bet a lot of people will go shopping on Friday for the first time ever too.— Facts Do Matter (@WilDonnelly) November 22, 2018
This one I'm just tired of.
He is literally too ignorant to understand how ignorant he is.Brutal and Extended Cold Blast could shatter ALL RECORDS - Whatever happened to Global Warming?— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2018
And not really so much a response as an observation (v. whatever it is Trump does):
A report this month in Nature raises a different, intriguing possibility about how urbanization might be making rainfall flooding worse, or at least how it did in Houston’s case: by literally slowing down storms. Researchers at the University of Iowa and Princeton built a model to estimate Harvey’s rainfall totals in the region. Then they took the city out of the model. They found the storm would have dropped less rain, and in different places, on a Harris County made of cropland.
Why? Basically, they think, the scale of the urban agglomeration in and around Harris County is creating atmospheric friction, putting a drag on storm winds. Climate change is supposed to produce more slow-moving storms like Harvey, which increases the scope of rainfall damage by leaving storm clouds to linger over one place—but cities may be slowing them down further, according to a co-efficient the authors call “roughness.” (Their models also conclude the growth of the city since 1950 is linked to a “clear increase in the magnitude and variability” of flooding.) In the case of Harvey, the storm’s extremely slow speed caused it to linger over East Texas for three days, concentrating rainfall damage.
It’s one more threatening way that “natural” disasters are evolving into our own creations.
There is a Reason for Posse Comitatus
and this is it.
Speaking with reporters on Wednesday, Mattis confirmed that he had been given the additional authority, but would await a request from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) before deciding how to use it.
“I have the authority to do more, now we’ll see what she asks me for,” Mattis said, referring to DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. He said he had no immediate intention of changing the mission.
Mattis said, depending on the DHS request, that troops may be given powers to temporarily detain migrants, but not the authority to arrest them. They would only be permitted to detain migrants for “minutes, not even hours” while they hand them over to border agents.
He said troops could help protect the border agents with shields and batons, but would be unarmed.
Two U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said a memo signed by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly gave Mattis the authority to protect immigration agents and if necessary, could include actions like use of lethal force, crowd control, temporary detention and cursory searches.
Border patrol agents are subject to Federal law and courts for their actions (such as the BP agent who killed a woman recently). Soldiers are subject to the military courts, and as my Criminal Law professor, a former JAG, put it: "Military justice is to justice what military music is to music."
Military personnel should not be deciding what "reasonable force" is in law enforcement situations, because they aren't trained in it. It's as unfair to the soldiers as it is to the immigrants, legal or illegal. "Protect" Border Patrol agents? That concept has a different meaning under Federal criminal law than it does in a military court-martial, a meaning far more complex than what would apply under the UCMJ. Which applies to the soldier? It won't be the one most convenient to the soldier, but the one most convenient to the government. Regard the murders of Jamal Khashoggi, who have been all but promised a fair trial before their executions. Very convenient for the Royal Family, but not exactly just. Will soldiers be excused for beating women and children because they crossed our border? Or will they be prosecuted as pawns in a game played by others?
Either way, this is very bad. And the situation is only getting worse as Trump and his legal advisers decided he is a king, thanks in large part to the Supreme Court's acquiescence on Trump's final version of a Muslim ban. The Court made the mistake of thinking they were dealing with a rational person, the same mistake the media is slowly realizing they have made. The media is waking up to the fact that even reporting Trump's statements is being a megaphone to his lies. Will the Court decide it is being used to justify Trump's tyranny? Because that is what we are seeing in action, more as he feels cornered by the House Democrats and whatever Mueller has in store, not to mention (the prosecutors haven't forgotten) those tax fraud allegations.
Adding:
"He said troops could help protect the border agents with shields and batons, but would be unarmed."
That's not the way Military Times is reporting it:
The memo signed by Kelly says:
This sounds about as fact-based as the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, and about as legally sound as the trespassing case brought against the Bundys in Oregon ("preventing them from performing the federal functions" is not exactly grounds for summary execution). This memo explicitly authorizes lethal force, or "going Israeli" on unarmed people who might throw stones. Kelly is not in the military chain of command, so it's dubious he has the authority asserted by this memo over the military, or that anyone, including the President, has the authority to suspend posse comitatus in these circumstances. That the White House is taking the Supreme Court decision on the Muslim ban and running with it for all they can get, is obvious. Whether they will be allowed to get away with it, is an open question. As Military Times put it:
Adding:
"He said troops could help protect the border agents with shields and batons, but would be unarmed."
That's not the way Military Times is reporting it:
The White House late Tuesday signed a memo allowing troops stationed at the border to engage in some law enforcement roles and use lethal force, if necessary — a move that legal experts have cautioned may run afoul of the Posse Comitatus Act.
The new “Cabinet order” was signed by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, not President Donald Trump. It allows “Department of Defense military personnel” to “perform those military protective activities that the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably necessary” to protect border agents, including “a show or use of force (including lethal force, where necessary), crowd control, temporary detention. and cursory search.”
However an earlier “decision memo” that came to the same recommendations that were contained in the “cabinet memo” was signed by President Trump, according to documents obtained by Newsweek.
The memo signed by Kelly says:
Credible evidence and intelligence indicates that migrant caravans originating from Central America and moving toward the southern border of the United States...may prompt incidents of violence and disorder that could threaten U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other United States personnel and prevent them from performing the federal functions necessary to secure and protect the integrity of the southern border.
This sounds about as fact-based as the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, and about as legally sound as the trespassing case brought against the Bundys in Oregon ("preventing them from performing the federal functions" is not exactly grounds for summary execution). This memo explicitly authorizes lethal force, or "going Israeli" on unarmed people who might throw stones. Kelly is not in the military chain of command, so it's dubious he has the authority asserted by this memo over the military, or that anyone, including the President, has the authority to suspend posse comitatus in these circumstances. That the White House is taking the Supreme Court decision on the Muslim ban and running with it for all they can get, is obvious. Whether they will be allowed to get away with it, is an open question. As Military Times put it:
Some of those activities, including crowd control and detention, may run into potential conflict with the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. If crossed, the erosion of the act’s limitations could represent a fundamental shift in the way the U.S. military is used, legal experts said.That is a fundamental shift this country doesn't need. We shall see what the courts say. We already know what Trump says:
There are a lot of CRIMINALS in the Caravan. We will stop them. Catch and Detain! Judicial Activism, by people who know nothing about security and the safety of our citizens, is putting our country in great danger. Not good!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 21, 2018
Next stop: divine right of kings.
Why You Don't Wrestle With a Pig
Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have “Obama judges,” and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country. It would be great if the 9th Circuit was indeed an “independent judiciary,” but if it is why......— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 21, 2018
.....are so many opposing view (on Border and Safety) cases filed there, and why are a vast number of those cases overturned. Please study the numbers, they are shocking. We need protection and security - these rulings are making our country unsafe! Very dangerous and unwise!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 21, 2018
Roberts did not start it, but he did respond to Trump's complaint about an "Obama judge" who ruled Trump didn't have the authority he thinks he has (i.e., Trump is not a King):
Roberts said Wednesday the U.S. doesn’t have “Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.” He commented in a statement released by the Supreme Court after a query by The Associated Press.Roberts was trying to speak for the independence of the judiciary. But he has now entered the fray, which is why Chief Justices don't comment like this (and shouldn't be prompted to by Presidents). Now, if this case gets to the Supreme Court, how does Roberts prove his independence? By ruling against Trump? Or for him? Does he become a "Trump judge" if the Court does the latter? Trump will surely say so. Is he a "Bush Judge" if the Court rules against the DOJ's legal theory (very likely, since the claim the people in Tijuana, Mexico represent a threat to the U.S. is a finding of fact in court; appellate courts must take findings of fact as given to them; they rule only on matters of law. If the lower court found the facts supporting the President's assertion weren't shown, the Supremes can't find them somewhere). Trump will complain publicly about that, too. Either way, Trump gets the last word, which in his book means he wins.
Roberts said on the day before Thanksgiving that an “independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
If the Court rules against Trump, or refuses the case on appeal, is that independence, or giving Trump a black eye for sounding off? Aye, there's the rub.....
And we all lose, because either way, Roberts has mud on him, and the stain is on the judiciary (for once, not a stain of their making). And Trump once again, like a baby with a shotgun, does damage all out of proportion with his understanding. Very serious damage, because Roberts is not wrong to defend the independence of the judiciary; but he will be wrong if he helps Trump drag the judiciary into the political realm any further than it has already gone.
Tuesday, November 20, 2018
Everything Old Is New Again
My first thought is: have you been to a church lately?
On the one hand, several major evangelical leaders and institutions have been vocal advocates for the dignity of refugees, and for a more compassionate public policy toward immigration overall.
In June, delegates at the Southern Baptist Convention’s annual conferences passed a near-unanimous resolution affirming the dignity of migrants and refugees. More recently, six major evangelical leaders, including Russell Moore, director of the Southern Baptist Convention’s policy arm, and Galen Caley, a vice president of the National Association of Evangelicals, released joint statements urging President Donald Trump to allow members of the Honduran migrant caravan currently making its way to the US-Mexico border to seek asylum in the United States.
“People fleeing for their lives are not to be used as political props,” Moore has said. “Those escaping violence and persecution in Honduras and elsewhere bear the image of God and should be treated with dignity and compassion. As Christians, we should share the heart of Jesus for refugees and others imperiled.”
On the other hand, white evangelicals report being more hostile to refugees, and to migrants more generally, than any other religious group in America. A full 68 percent of them say they believe America has no responsibility to house refugees, according to a poll by Pew conducted this spring. Another poll, conducted by Washington Post/ABC in January, found that 75 percent of white evangelicals said they thought that the Trump-era federal crackdown on undocumented immigrants was a good thing, compared to just 46 percent of Americans overall.
....
The reasons for this discrepancy are complicated. They include a white evangelical population that gets its moral sense as much from conservative media as it does from scripture. There’s also a more general conflation of white evangelicalism with the GOP party agenda, which has been intensifying since the days of the Moral Majority in the 1980s.
Yeah, they aren't as simple as that, either.
Pastors in general tend to be more liberal than their congregation. Not necessarily in a political sense, but in the sense of compassion for strangers, for immigrants, etc. Sure, there are plenty of pastors (Burton cites the ones who openly and publicly support Trump and his immigration policies) who are somewhere to the right of Atilla the Hun (Ed Young, come on down!). But it's not at all unusual for pastors to be far more open to the needs of the stranger than the congregation is; especially if the stranger is not staying conveniently on the other side of the border, or town, or the railroad tracks.
Here, this is what I mean by "liberal":
Stetzer acknowledged that “what you have is a distance between the grassroots and what’s often called the evangelical leadership” on immigration, with evangelicals in the pews generally far more negative on immigrants than those in the pulpit. “The leaders of evangelical institutions have increasing distance from one another at this issue.” Only, he said, once evangelical leaders and pastors were successful in promoting a Biblical theology of immigration, rather than one gleaned from cable news, could everyday evangelicals adopt a less reactionary stance towards migration.
You don't have to be a disciple of Walter Brueggemann or a fan of Marilynne Robinson to study the Bible and come to the conclusion God favors the stranger and the dispossessed. That's what the reference to "Biblical theology" is; basically a theology not derived from studying Plato and Aristotle (i.e., Catholic theology) but one drawn strictly from Scripture (the problems of doing that are manifest and not immediately obvious, but let it go for now). The appeal of such a theology to literalists and hard core sola scriptura types should be clear. The problem is, the Bible is fine so long as it doesn't get in the way of what they already believe. Sort of like this, in fact:
At the same time, Wussow noted, “One of the propositions that Romans 13 stands for that government is ... an institution that’s been created by God, for the good of humanity.” Ultimately, he said, the idea of national borders — and that a government’s response is primarily to care for its own people — is also scriptural.
“I think if you just sort of step back and look at scripture, God seems to see the world in terms of nations,” he said, adding: “We think that every government has an obligation and responsibility to care first for those who are within its sovereignty and then answer the question, What can we do to extend compassion to those who are fleeing persecution.”
Uh, no; Paul was writing at a time when any disagreement with Rome, especially in writing, could get you crucified. Paul was no fool, and no rabble rouser seeking the end of Roman tyranny. The modern-day parallel would be the death of Jamal Khashoggi, murdered for the mildest of disagreements with the Saudi Royal Family. Had he kept quiet, would he have been saying their rule is an unalloyed good? Neither did Paul necessarily think Rome was O.K. Besides, we have Jesus' word on that already (written down after Paul's letter to the church in Rome, but no matter): "Give Caesar what is Caesar's, and God what is God's." Not a lot of room there for saying God sees the world in terms of nations. Especially since, as another evangelical Burton quotes, puts it:
But, Yang pointed out, the idea of civil disobedience — even when it comes specifically to immigration — is also deeply rooted in scripture. He cited the biblical story in the book of Genesis of Abraham smuggling his wife Sarah into Egypt, having her pose as his sister, to protect her. “People need to also understand that the laws are broken in scripture,” she said.
In fact, she argued: “The whole scripture is based on migration. Every single major biblical character was an immigrant. Jesus himself was a refugee. Abraham, who’s considered the father of our faith ... was an immigrant. Joseph was a victim of human trafficking.”
The problem, fundamentally, is getting people to read the scriptures, or just to listen to them. The stories are very clear; but not if you don't know them, and most church goers just don't. The problem is, also, you can't get two evangelicals to agree on what scripture says; why are you surprised whole congregations ignore most of what their pastors try to teach them? Isn't there a story about this in Exodus? Involving a golden calf?
Everything old is new again.
I would like to praise how this article ends, because it ends this way:
White evangelicals, in other words, are only part of the story of evangelicalism in America. And as their numbers shrink, an “evangelical” approach to politics may come to look very different.
But the context of that remark is that "evangelicals" are changing as people from Latin America, Asia, and Africa, come to America and establish non-white evangelical churches. "Evangelical," in other words, is still the default setting of "Christian" in America. So, the rest of you who are Christian but not "evangelical"? You don't count. Go home, you're wasting your time. The evangelicals are, as they've always insisted, the "true Christians." The rest are to be ignored. The media has spoken, and who can argue with them?
P.S. I wrote this, finished it, published it, then found a link to this post in my statistics. Yeah, I've talked about this before, from another direction. That doesn't surprise me. What does is that two people found it, which was enough to bring it to my attention. You call it what you want; I call it a sign the Holy Spirit has a wicked sense of humor. We could argue the point, but how would we know which of us was right without agreeing not to change our opinions before we started?
Happy Thanksgiving and F U to the Troops--Yr. Commander in Chief
Trump says people shouldn’t worry about US troops spending Thanksgiving at the border because they are “tough people”— Jordan Fabian (@Jordanfabian) November 20, 2018
Trump says “don’t worry” about troops who have to spend thanksgiving on the border, they’re tough people and proud to be protecting the nation.— Kathryn Watson (@kathrynw5) November 20, 2018
"Protecting the nation"? From men, women and children seeking asylum in accordance with U.S. law? And "protecting the nation" by stringing up concertina wire and then standing back because that's literally all they can do?
Meanwhile, Trump is off to Mar A Lago for Thanksgiving dinner and a long weekend of...well, phone calls, I'm sure. Phone calls keep him very busy.
Monday, November 19, 2018
Not Talking About the Elephant, either
And really, spending copious amounts of time pointing out how wrong Trump is about forest fires and Finland is just wasting time (the e-mail is interesting, though, if you're interested in the ecology of Finland). Trump doesn't lie for clever or devious or strategic purposes. He lies because he is stupid, and because he can't handle any part of reality impinging on what vestigial moral sense he still has. He didn't stand among the ruins of Paradise, California (which he kept calling "Pleasure," again not a strategic choice, just more ignorance) to praise the Finns for their forest management skills; he just didn't know how to accept the devastation all around him, and so he blamed someone for getting on his last moral nerve (the few he has left). It was, for Trump, an expression of compassion, even sympathy. Rather than bash Californians to their face (he's too much of a coward for that), he offers them what he thinks is a solution to their problem. Because he's truly incapable of anything more than blaming the victim. True expressions of sympathy are simply beyond his ken.
He's not a strategic genius or a depraved despot; he's a sociopath. He is not calculating and clever, hiding his true aims behind a cloud of media squid ink and a torrent of distractions. He is precisely what he appears to be: an emotionally stunted xenophobic racist misogynist no more fit for public office than the average 9 year old.
Submitted for your approval
something worth thinking about, as Advent impends (and this blog turns itself over to matters religious and liturgical for a month or so; don't say you weren't warned!):
One of the most fascinating arguments of the book is that while Christians knew there were problems with the text, it wasn’t the “faith killer” that it is today. Knust and Wasserman show that interest in the “original version” and “accuracy” of the New Testament texts is very much a recent phenomenon that began in the 18th and 19th centuries with the rise of critical scholarship.
Prior to that, and in the early Church in particular, Christians were more likely to have been used to thinking about the Jesus story in practice, rather than on paper. As they told me, “The stories and sayings Christians tell, hear, read, copy, illustrate, and perform, in and out of church, have always been as important—even more important!—for determining beliefs about ‘the gospel’ than the words in a given text.”
What the history of this story shows, as Knust and Wasserman so deftly demonstrate, is that even though this story doesn’t belong to the author of the Gospel of John (and, many might argue, probably never happened), this isn’t the central point. To early Christians this story had “broad appeal,” and that appeal was not exclusively grounded in the claim that it was historically accurate. As they write in the conclusion to their book, the “lesson” of the woman caught in adultery isn’t just that the text of the Gospels changed, but that what survived and counted as ‘authentic’ was greatly influenced by local liturgical traditions.
This, if true, is fascinating; but I'm not sure it's true:
Though they are careful to point out that we don’t know for sure where the story came from or why it was added to the Gospel of John, Knust, an associate professor of New Testament and Christian Origins at Boston University, and Wasserman, a professor of Biblical Studies at Ansgar Teologiske Høgskole in Norway, told The Daily Beast that the interpolation took place “in a context where Greek was used but Latin was also spoken, and probably because the interpolator thought it fit best into that Gospel.” They added that “we can only speculate about why John and not some other Gospel,” but mentioned several theories, including the prominence of stories about women in the Fourth Gospel. They also note the intriguing theory of New Testament scholar Chris Keith that, in addition to portraying Jesus as forgiving, the story also presents Jesus as able to write. Perhaps it was added, then, to combat the scandalous accusation that Jesus wasn’t fully literate.
Kind of depends on who you're trying to impress. Full widespread literacy didn't occur the late Middle Ages. Paul could read, but could only write his name. He dictated his letters to a secretary, somebody who could write as he talked. Jesus of Nazareth was undoubtedly illiterate, a fact that wouldn't have bothered those who heard him (or initially followed him) at all. The people demanding Jesus be portrayed as literate (didn't Luke do that already, with young Jesus in the Temple?) were not the same people listening to the stories of Jesus and enjoying the nativity (and later morality) plays in church in December. Anyway, an interesting (if old, again; at least in seminary and scholarship circles) issue that made me want to pull down my copy of Bultmann on the Gospel of John, which I will do if the pace of the holidays relents long enough to let me (gotta line up those advent posts!).
Not Thinking of an Elephant
Still keeping them away
George Lakoff (trying to revive his pundit credentials) says Trump lies to distract us from the "big truths." Funny thing, he never says what those "big truths" are. But he agrees with the Very Serious People that the voters we must worry about are the truck drivers at truck stops because everyone who is Serious agrees that's the narrative.
And if the media would only buy (from Lakoff) and then sell Lakoff's "truth sandwiches" (I am NOT making that up!), Trump would vanish with a stamp of his foot like Rumplestiltskin, and our long national nightmare would at last be over. Again, presumably; it's not really clear what Lakoff thinks would happen, but probably it would be wonderful.
Not to pick on Lakoff alone, because this is something a number of pundits and would-be pundits have chosen to gnaw on as the worry bone of American life:
Even if all politicians lie, I believe that post-truth foreshadows something more sinister. In his powerful book “On Tyranny,” historian Timothy Snyder writes that “post-truth is pre-fascism.” It is a tactic seen in “electoral dictatorships” – where a society retains the facade of voting without the institutions or trust to ensure that it is an actual democracy, like those in Putin’s Russia or Erdogan’s Turkey.
In this, Trump is following the authoritarian playbook, characterized by leaders lying, the erosion of public institutions and the consolidation of power. You do not need to convince someone that you are telling the truth when you can simply assert your will over them and dominate their reality
The context there is Trump's lies, but the analysis is that Trump's lies have some kind of performative existence. If they did, we'd be much more like Putin's Russia or Erdogan's Turkey, and while Trump might wish that were true, the evidence is it's just not happening, viz:
A group of Senate Democrats is suing to block Matt Whitaker from serving as acting attorney general on grounds that his placement in the post was unconstitutional.
The suit, which is being filed by Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI) in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, is the latest and most aggressive salvo against the Whitaker appointment. Last week, the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel defended Whitaker’s promotion in a memo that drew immediate criticism for its expansive understanding of the president’s power. That view is in hot dispute, including from the state of Maryland, which petitioned a federal judge to stop him from serving on constitutional grounds.
....
“Installing Matthew Whitaker so flagrantly defies constitutional law that any viewer of Schoolhouse Rock would recognize it,” Blumenthal said in a statement. “President Trump is denying Senators our constitutional obligation and opportunity to do our job: scrutinizing the nomination of our nation’s top law enforcement official. The reason is simple: Whitaker would never pass the advice and consent test. In selecting a so-called “constitutional nobody” and thwarting every Senator’s constitutional duty, Trump leaves us no choice but to seek recourse through the courts.”
These are not the actions of political enemies being ground under the heel of a powerful despot. Trump is so powerful and charismatic he goes to California and still blames them for the loss of property and lives there. How's that working out for him? Trump may be "following the authoritarian playbook," but nobody besides the scared old men of the NFL (who have dedicated the football season to "honoring our armed forces" and make their team coaching staffs wear camouflage decorated jackets on the sidelines) is following his lead. When is this "something sinister" going to come to pass? Because the evidence continues to mount that Democrats won a rout in House elections this year.
Then again, Putin and Erdogan aren't known for doing things like this:
But [John] Oliver argued that Trump’s “weirdest unforced error this week” came during a Medal of Freedom ceremony honoring the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (as well as the wife of one of Trump’s biggest donors). After naming Scalia’s nine children, Trump addressed Scalia’s widow, Maureen, who was in attendance. “You were very busy!” the president told her. “Wow. Wow. I always knew I liked him.”
“What are you doing, you strange, strange man!” Oliver exclaimed. “You’re essentially saying, ‘I like your dead husband because I like people who fuck a lot because I fuck a lot. Guess what? I just took a speech about your dead husband and made it about me fucking a lot. Sorry for your loss, come get your medal.’”
Funny how Trump's narcissism and complete lack of empathy never figure into these analyses of doom
Despite the media not making "truth sandwiches" instead of journalism, and the Democrats thinking we are all controlled by Enlightenment thinking, Democrats still managed an historic win this month.* And managed it despite the pundits still insisting it didn't happen.
Maybe this is one more reason the narrative is that we all still need the pundits to explain our politics, and ourselves, to us. I mean, if they can't do that, what can they do?
*Apparently the majority of us still use facts to reach the right conclusion, but pundits trade in opinions, not facts.
God Damn America? (When a black man said it, it was a problem....)
Yeah, he's happy to put that on tape. And we should, of course, be very concerned, even if we aren't aligned with Dr. Young's politics (or theology):
Matthew Wilson, an SMU associate professor of political science, is a leading expert on evangelical Christian voters.
“We should not underestimate the extent to which many evangelicals feel that the church faces existential threats in America today,” he wrote by email.
“The Democratic Party now embraces legal abortion, same-sex marriage, gender fluidity, and a secularized public square … Given all of that, it is not a stretch from the evangelical point of view to think of the Democratic Party as ‘godless.’ "
Where "godless" means "not right-wing enough, and too friendly to non-whites":
In other words, the more like Trump we all are, the closer to God we all are. Because: reasons. And fear of a brown planet.
At Culberson’s post-election gathering, according to video from Houston television station KHOU, Young claimed a Pittsburgh-area Democratic Party chairman had been forced out over a Facebook repost about how Americans should “kneel at the cross.”
The post actually criticized NFL players’ anthem protests, one of several that seemed more like racial insults.
But Young took it out of context, telling the Republican gathering the Democratic Party is “no longer a party. It’s some kind of religion that is basically godless, and as long as America — and this is represented by every Democrat I know — does not believe in the sacredness of the life in the mother’s womb, God will not bless America or make us a great nation.”
I wish I was exaggerating this.
Praising Donald Trump as a paragon of Christianity and bringing of blessings on the nation is curious, considering the blessings would flow from a racist misogynistic xenophobes who thinks the letter of Paul is to 2 Corinthians and communion is just a little water and a sip of wine and besides he has nothing to confess or regret, including never attending church.
Come to think of it, people like Ed Young don't think too much of the sacraments either, consider attendance at revivals a greater sign of personal holiness than attendance on Sunday morning, think "God helps those who help themselves" is from the book of Proverbs, and don't really care about confession or even moral responsibility, since once you're saved you've got it made, And church attendance is mostly to see who's NOT there or what condition they're in before noon on Sunday morning. So yeah, I guess Donald Trump is religious by those standards, since his politics are to the right of Atilla the Hun, and that's what really matters..
Never thought much of Ed Young, and now I'm more than convinced the old man needs to retire. (He's almost 20 years older than me, it's time he shuffled off the stage.)
What's going on here is a political fight, pure and simple. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who won re-election without a sweeping mandate and saw Democrats make gains across the state, was honest enough to say the people who defeated Texas Republicans (or nearly did, like Beto) scare him. He is a true believer in his right-wing fantasies, and the evidence that he's not supported by 90% of Texas has shaken him. It's shaking religious "leaders," too (Young heads the largest Baptist church in Houston, but as a local mover and shaker he really doesn't even show up on the radar screen). There's enough foolishness to go around here; for example:
This is where I usually turn to Professor Darrell L. Bock of the conservative Dallas Theological Seminary, the author of the 2016 book “How Would Jesus Vote? Do Your Political Views Really Align With the Bible?”
“I think the issue of abortion is an important one,” he wrote by email, and some Republicans consider Democrats godless because they dismiss debating other options and seem indifferent to taking any responsibility for a developing life.
Texas has refused to expand Medicaid, and has some of the most stringent measures for qualification for Medicaid in the country (basically you have to be homeless to qualify, and then you hardly get any help for medical needs). that is a measure of how little Texas does to help the poor. So Texas, under Republican control for over a quarter of a century, is "profoundly indifferent to taking any responsibility for a developing life." And the Baptists in Texas aren't exactly known for their charity hospitals, orphanages, or other efforts to care for those whom Jesus spoke personally to. (Is this the appropriate place to put in a plug for the German Evangelical church, which established a hospital, an orphanage, a mental asylum, and a mission for river workers on the Mississippi, shortly after the immigrants themselves got here? These institutions still exist, some of them still explicitly tied to the successor United Church of Christ. Baylor has a hospital in Dallas, a school of medicine, but no ties to the Baptists that I know of.) So this is not a case of mixing religion in politics; it's much more a case of mixing politics in religion.
That's not a mixture that harms the state; it is an admixture that harms religion, though.
Sunday, November 18, 2018
Today in Presidenting
Just an ordinary day in the Finnish forest ~ Ihan normipäivä suomalaisessa metsässä #Trump #forest #firesafety #raking #forestry #Finland #Finnish #CaliforniaFire #RakingAmericaGreatAgain #rakingtheforest #Suomi #haravointi #metsäpalot #rakingleaves pic.twitter.com/YOKA3D6C2K— Pyry Luminen (@pyryluminen) November 18, 2018
They're not laughing at us; they're laughing at him.
“He’s a Hillary Clinton backer!” Trump snapped at Wallace.
“He was a Navy SEAL,” Wallace observed.
“It would be nice if we got Osama bin Laden a lot sooner,” Trump complained. “Wouldn’t it have been nice?”
“I did not back Hillary Clinton or anyone else,” he fact-checked. “I am a fan of President Obama and President George W. Bush, both of whom I worked for.”
“I admire all presidents, regardless of their political party, who uphold the dignity of the office and who use that office to bring the nation together in challenging times,” he continued.
“I stand by my comment that the president’s attack on the media is the greatest threat to our democracy in my lifetime,” he added. “When you undermine the people’s right to free press and freedom of speech and expression, then you threaten the Constitution and all for which it stands.”
And it seems like it was only yesterday:
Where Our President said (and I can't wait to hear how this is fake news):President @realDonaldTrump is traveling to California to meet with those impacted by the devastating wildfires. Learn how the Trump Administration is supporting the State of California during this emergency: https://t.co/iHcbAfmsq9 pic.twitter.com/nGY96wHt1F— The White House (@WhiteHouse) November 17, 2018
“You’ve gotta take care of the floors, you know, the floors of the forest, very important,” Trump said, flanked by the current and future governors of California. “You look at other countries where they do it differently and it’s a whole different story.”
He added: “I was with the President of Finland and he called it a forest nation, and they spend a lot of time on raking and cleaning and doing things and they don’t have any problem, and when it is, it’s a very small problem.”
Incapable of empathy, he regards every situation which causes him moral pain as something to be blamed on others. And yes, he is that clueless:
Really, really clueless:Incredible to be with our GREAT HEROES today in California. We will always be with you! pic.twitter.com/B1MCTF83Zf— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 18, 2018
I perhaps wouldn't compare Finland and California climate-wise...— Veli-Pekka Kivimäki (@vpkivimaki) November 17, 2018
And besides, 80% of the country is classified as forest land. We don't exactly manicure all of it. https://t.co/fthi7FUw0N
Which is why the Finns are mocking him today.
And echoing a quote prominent at this blog, the last word is from Pope Francis:
“Injustice is the perverse root of poverty,” Francis said at a Mass marking the Roman Catholic Church’s annual World Day of the Poor. “The cry of the poor daily becomes stronger but heard less, drowned out by the din of the rich few, who grow ever fewer and more rich.”
Francis also reiterated his support for migrants saying that people must pay attention to “all those forced to flee their homes and native land for an uncertain future”.
Since Trump won't realize it was about him, he won't notice it was said. Gonna be a long two years, even longer with the pundits assuring us what just happened at the ballot box didn't really happen because they didn't call it first.
Yup.
Seems likely Democrats will eventually get up to about 60m total votes for the House once unprocessed ballots from CA are tallied. Maybe a bit more (~61M?) based on what's left in other states. Those are similar numbers to what recent GOP *presidential* candidates have received.— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 18, 2018
There's not any precedent for an opposition party coming this close to matching the president's vote total from 2 years earlier. The closest to an exception was when Democratic House candidates in 1970 got 92% of Nixon's vote total from 1968. pic.twitter.com/NOTLQnYI9z— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 18, 2018
What's that Orwell quote about seeing what's right in front of you? The "blue wave" was so big the pundits still can't see it.About 60 million people turned out to vote for Democrats for the House this year. That is a **crazy** number. (Republicans got 45m votes in the 2010 wave.)— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 18, 2018
And this was sort of missed. Why so many stories about Trump voters in truck stops and not so many about "the resistance"?
Lordelpus
Apparently this started there, then went here:Rep. Adam Schiff said Pres.Trump “needs to listen to the experts” when it comes to the wildfires ravaging the state, adding that “clearly” the president “isn't one of them.” https://t.co/yNJMK9Rd3s pic.twitter.com/VpunuQHOam— ABC News (@ABC) November 18, 2018
(No surprise the President wouldn't defend his remarks in California), and then here:So funny to see little Adam Schitt (D-CA) talking about the fact that Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker was not approved by the Senate, but not mentioning the fact that Bob Mueller (who is highly conflicted) was not approved by the Senate!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 18, 2018
Trump's inability to grasp the most basic features of the Constitution he swore to preserve, protect, and defend, continues unabated.Wow, Mr. President, that’s a good one.— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) November 18, 2018
Was that like your answers to Mr. Mueller’s questions, or did you write this one yourself? https://t.co/Yd27sayt7C
Thursday, November 15, 2018
Why Doesn't This Thing Work Anymore?
Universities will someday study what highly conflicted (and NOT Senate approved) Bob Mueller and his gang of Democrat thugs have done to destroy people. Why is he protecting Crooked Hillary, Comey, McCabe, Lisa Page & her lover, Peter S, and all of his friends on the other side?— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2018
Trump University will be the only school conducting such studies.
A special prosecutor is not, and never has been, a "principal officer" under Art. II of the Constitution, so a special prosecutor is never appointed subject to advice and consent of the Senate. For the rest: show me the evidence.
The only “Collusion” is that of the Democrats with Russia and many others. Why didn’t the FBI take the Server from the DNC? They still don’t have it. Check out how biased Facebook, Google and Twitter are in favor of the Democrats. That’s the real Collusion!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2018
Golden Oldies don't work like they used to. And now social media companies are against him? Part of that international you-know-who conspiracy we're hearing about again, I guess.
Um....
The White House is running very smoothly and the results for our Nation are obviously very good. We are the envy of the world. But anytime I even think about making changes, the FAKE NEWS MEDIA goes crazy, always seeking to make us look as bad as possible! Very dishonest!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2018
The inner workings of the Mueller investigation are a total mess. They have found no collusion and have gone absolutely nuts. They are screaming and shouting at people, horribly threatening them to come up with the answers they want. They are a disgrace to our Nation and don’t...— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2018
....care how many lives the ruin. These are Angry People, including the highly conflicted Bob Mueller, who worked for Obama for 8 years. They won’t even look at all of the bad acts and crimes on the other side. A TOTAL WITCH HUNT LIKE NO OTHER IN AMERICAN HISTORY!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2018
Wednesday, November 14, 2018
Speaking of Dog Whistles
#Broward election supervisors ongoing violation of #Florida law requiring timely reporting isn’t just annoying incompetence. It has opened the door for lawyers to come here & try to steal a seat in the U.S. Senate & Florida Cabinet— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) November 8, 2018
#Sayfie
6/6
Interlopers! Carpetbaggers! Scalawags! Outside agee-taters!
I guess you have to be from the South to hear that one, but Rubio is blowing it so hard his whistle probably broke.
Fake News?
The story in the New York Times concerning North Korea developing missile bases is inaccurate. We fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new - and nothing happening out of the normal. Just more Fake News. I will be the first to let you know if things go bad!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 13, 2018
Follow the bouncing ball, starting with that NYT article two days ago:
The secret ballistic missile bases were identified in a detailed study published Monday by the Beyond Parallel program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a major think tank in Washington.Jump back to last June:
Trump says he trusts Kim Jong Un. And if he's wrong? "I may be wrong, I mean I may stand before you in six months and say, 'Hey I was wrong,'" said Trump, before adding, "I don't know that I'll ever admit that, but I'll find some kind of an excuse." https://t.co/fk4Fpko8qC pic.twitter.com/FKFfSVE7VE— CNN (@CNN) June 12, 2018
The six-month report by independent experts monitoring the implementation of U.N. sanctions was submitted to the Security Council North Korea sanctions committee late on Friday.
“(North Korea) has not stopped its nuclear and missile programs and continued to defy Security Council resolutions through a massive increase in illicit ship-to-ship transfers of petroleum products, as well as through transfers of coal at sea during 2018,” the experts wrote in the 149-page report.
A Washington-based think tank on Monday said it has identified 13 of the estimated 20 undeclared missile operating bases in North Korea, while noting the somewhat-limited capabilities of the sites.
"Missile operating bases are not launch facilities,” Joseph Bermudez wrote in a report published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “While missiles could be launched from within them in an emergency, Korean People’s Army (KPA) operational procedures call for missile launchers to disperse from the bases to pre-surveyed or semi-prepared launch sites for operations.”
“North Korea’s decommissioning of the Sohae satellite launch facility, while gaining much media attention, obscures the military threat to U.S. forces and South Korea from this and other undeclared ballistic missile bases,” Bermudez wrote, adding that the sites appear to be "active and being reasonably well-maintained."
U.S. analysts said Monday they have located 13 secret North Korean missile development sites, underscoring the challenge that the Trump administration faces in trying to reach its promised broad arms control agreement with Pyongyang.The New York Times (yesterday):
The administration has said it is hopeful about eventually reaching an agreement with North Korea. President Donald Trump declared after his historic summit in June that with President Kim Jong Un there was "no longer a nuclear threat from North Korea." But a report based on satellite imagery shows the complexity posed by an extensive network of weapons facilities that the U.S. wants to neutralize.
And Mr. Trump? He appears still happily convinced that love had conquered all. “We fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new — and nothing happening out of the normal,” he said on Twitter on Tuesday. “Just more Fake News. I will be the first to let you know if things go bad!”I suppose it's comforting that the U.S. knows about these bases. That the President seems to think everything is fine, is far less comforting.
How bad they have to go before Mr. Trump abandons his delusions of an epochal achievement is anybody’s guess. But once he does, it is easy to imagine him unleashing even more of the apocalyptic language that raised tensions in 2017. The difference is that this time he will probably not have the support of China, Russia or South Korea, which took the June summit meeting as a signal to improve relations with North Korea and are not likely to turn back.
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
"We need to be careful of what we say. Words mean things these days."
When will Bill Nelson concede in Florida? The characters running Broward and Palm Beach voting will not be able to “find” enough votes, too much spotlight on them now!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 13, 2018
Both the state elections department and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which are run by Republican appointees, have said they have seen no evidence of voter fraud anywhere in the state and a Broward judge challenged anyone who has evidence of fraud to file a report.And the President doesn't speak for the White House (!):
White House spokeswoman Mercedes Schlapp said Tuesday the president “obviously has his opinion” on the recount. Trump on Monday tweeted that “An honest vote count is no longer possible” in Florida, without elaborating, and said “new ballots showed up out of nowhere.” It was unclear what he was referring to. He demanded that the election night results — which showed the Republicans leading based upon incomplete ballot counts — be used to determine the winner.
Besides, why can't we just agree that the Republican won and be done with all this tedious "vote counting"?
“It’s been incredibly frustrating to watch. You have a 12,000-vote gap and the other candidate refuses to concede,” Schlapp said, referring to Scott’s opponent, incumbent Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson. “So I think at this point that it’s going to go through the process of the manual recount and the machine recount and we’ll see what happens, but we’re confident that Rick Scott will be the next senator of Florida.”Speaking of speaking out:
The judge said he could see no evidence of any violations, and said “I am urging because of the highly public nature of this case to ramp down the rhetoric.”The irony? Under Florida law, the Republicans may end up getting what they want anyway (how conveeeeenient!):
“If someone in this lawsuit or someone in this county has evidence of voter fraud or irregularities at the supervisor’s office, they should report it to their local law enforcement officer,” Tuter said. “If the lawyers are aware of it, they should swear out an affidavit, but everything the lawyers are saying out there in front of the elections office is being beamed all over the country. We need to be careful of what we say. Words mean things these days.”
In Palm Beach, Elections Supervisor Susan Bucher said the county’s 11-year-old tallying machines aren’t fast enough to complete the recount by Thursday. The county is doing the Senate race first and will then do the governor. If the deadline is not met in a race, the results it reported last Saturday will stand.
Is this a great country, or what?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






