Thursday, April 27, 2023

English Majors For The Win!

Of course, it may be that the judge is merely literate, but that's a win, too! (And by the way, yes, it's going well for Tacopina. And yes, like Swift's famous essay, that's sarcasm): It's been noted all over legal Twitter that, without Trump's testimony, Tacopina has to present his defense through this cross-examination. Having the judge diss your questions, or stifle them, is not considered a winning legal strategy. Nor can this be, really: Carroll's lawyers will have little trouble introducing Trump's deposition testimony about that picture now; and even less trouble setting it up for the jury as part of their narrative. The picture is not the point here; continuing objections to Tacopina's questions are. This is not fatal; but it is part of a death by a thousand cuts. You don't win a lot of jury sympathy, usually, by sparring with the judge. Jurors may not now what the grounds for the objection are, but they are more likely to think you're being an asshole, than not.

No comments:

Post a Comment