I’m completely open to the argument one poll questioned one set of respondents and the second poll questioned a different set of respondents who’d have answered that way anyway. Correlation and causation are arguably poorly distinguished because the distinction is based on arguments drawn from statistics, not from double-blind studies.Polling from @Reuters has revealed a significant change in the attitudes of Republican voters before vs. after the Jan. 6 hearings. pic.twitter.com/rYeaRTXTGG
— The Republican Accountability Project (@AccountableGOP) July 25, 2022
Still, it’s more fun to follow along with the narrative. Because it’s what I want to be true.
No comments:
Post a Comment