Thursday, January 14, 2021

“Incitement” Isn’t Limited To Speeches That Day

 Why is this important? The arm chair prosecutors (including law professors who should know better, but like seeing their names in print) huff and puff about how Trump's speech (what bits of it they've heard excerpted on TV or the intertoobs) was not sufficient to create a charge of incitement.  But there is a "totality of the evidence" question, reaching back to Trump's tweets ("It's going to be wild!") and his claims of fraudulent behavior in the elections and demands it be stopped in Congress. This evidence alone indicates there was planning, and planning indicates there was a conspiracy: Besides, the insurrectionists got the message: There are very serious questions to investigate, which the U.S. Attorney in D.C. will undoubtedly do. An investigation for a Senate impeachment trial is also warranted: And don't consider the Senate trial a foregone conclusion, either:

No comments:

Post a Comment