In evaluating whether a course of action was wise or foolish it's always necessary to ask "compared to what?" So, for instance, in evaluating whether it was wise to follow the advice of a drunken @RudyGiuliani, one must ask "you mean compared to a sober Rudy Giuliani?"
— DustUpHat (@Popehat) June 13, 2022
What did he think about what Jason Miller said?Rudy Giuliani is lashing out at today's Jan. 6 hearing by calling Liz Cheney "completely hysterical" and "off her deep end." And he is also pushing the baseless conspiracy theory that Antifa killed Ashli Babbitt. pic.twitter.com/NmpU0QzJQK
— David Edwards (@DavidEdwards) June 13, 2022
And was he drunk when he went on Bannon's podcast today? Or was he drunk when he testified to the Committee?Rudy Giuliani was 'definitely intoxicated' when he told Trump to declare election night victory: Jason Miller https://t.co/3YOt9kYgu7
— Raw Story (@RawStory) June 13, 2022
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 13, 2022Meanwhile, in misapplication of legal doctrines:
Actually goes to "actual knowledge" of fraud. Which is worse.Most damaging mens rea evidence so far.
— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) June 13, 2022
Trump knew in advance and on Election Night of the "Red Mirage" - creating false impression he was winning.
Trump nonetheless used mirage to tell his supporters election was being stolen.
Bill Stepien under oath
Bill Barr under oath https://t.co/P3DC6y98Cp
No comments:
Post a Comment